Results 1  10
of
642,417
The complexity of theoremproving procedures
 IN STOC
, 1971
"... It is shown that any recognition problem solved by a polynomial timebounded nondeterministic Turing machine can be “reduced” to the problem of determining whether a given propositional formula is a tautology. Here “reduced ” means, roughly speaking, that the first problem can be solved deterministi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1048 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
It is shown that any recognition problem solved by a polynomial timebounded nondeterministic Turing machine can be “reduced” to the problem of determining whether a given propositional formula is a tautology. Here “reduced ” means, roughly speaking, that the first problem can be solved deterministically in polynomial time provided an oracle is available for solving the second. From this notion of reducible, polynomial degrees of difficulty are defined, and it is shown that the problem of determining tautologyhood has the same polynomial degree as the problem of determining whether the first of two given graphs is isomorphic to a subgraph of the second. Other examples are discussed. A method of measuring the complexity of proof procedures for the predicate calculus is introduced and discussed. Throughout this paper, a set of strings 1 means a set of strings on some fixed, large, finite alphabet Σ. This alphabet is large enough to include symbols for all sets described here. All Turing machines are deterministic recognition devices, unless the contrary is explicitly stated.
and Theorem Proving
"... Hardware description languages (hdls) are a notation to describe behavioural and structural aspects of circuit designs. We discuss why it is worthwhile to give a formal semantics for an hdl, and why we have encoded such a semantics in a proof system. We outline the subset of the hardware description ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
description language ella 1 which we use, its formal structural operational semantics, and its embedding in the higherorder logic proof system Lambda 2. Finally we discuss applications of this approach which include the ability to prove results about the simulation mechanism, formal symbolic simulation
Application of theorem proving to problem solving
, 1969
"... This paper shows how an extension of the resolution proof procedure can be used to construct problem solutions. The extended proof procedure can solve problems involving state transformations. The paper explores several alternate problem representations and provides a discussion of solutions to samp ..."
Abstract

Cited by 264 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
to sample problems including the "Monkey and Bananas " puzzle and the 'Tower of Hanoi " puzzle. The paper exhibits solutions to these problems obtained by QA3, a computer program bused on these theoremproving methods. In addition, the paper shows how QA3 can write simple
Theorem Proving with the Real Numbers
, 1996
"... This thesis discusses the use of the real numbers in theorem proving. Typically, theorem provers only support a few `discrete' datatypes such as the natural numbers. However the availability of the real numbers opens up many interesting and important application areas, such as the verification ..."
Abstract

Cited by 119 (13 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This thesis discusses the use of the real numbers in theorem proving. Typically, theorem provers only support a few `discrete' datatypes such as the natural numbers. However the availability of the real numbers opens up many interesting and important application areas, such as the verification
Theorem Proving Modulo
 Journal of Automated Reasoning
"... Abstract. Deduction modulo is a way to remove computational arguments from proofs by reasoning modulo a congruence on propositions. Such a technique, issued from automated theorem proving, is of much wider interest because it permits to separate computations and deductions in a clean way. The first ..."
Abstract

Cited by 111 (18 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Deduction modulo is a way to remove computational arguments from proofs by reasoning modulo a congruence on propositions. Such a technique, issued from automated theorem proving, is of much wider interest because it permits to separate computations and deductions in a clean way. The first
Probabilistic Theorem Proving
"... Many representation schemes combining firstorder logic and probability have been proposed in recent years. Progress in unifying logical and probabilistic inference has been slower. Existing methods are mainly variants of lifted variable elimination and belief propagation, neither of which take logic ..."
Abstract

Cited by 70 (23 self)
 Add to MetaCart
logical structure into account. We propose the first method that has the full power of both graphical model inference and firstorder theorem proving (in finite domains with Herbrand interpretations). We first define probabilistic theorem proving, their generalization, as the problem of computing
Nonresolution theorem proving
 Artificial Intelligence
, 1977
"... This talk reviews those efforts in automatic theorem proving, during the past few years, which have emphasized techniques other than resolution. These include: knowledge bases, natural deduction, reduction, (rewrite rules), typing, procedures, advice, controlled forward chaining, algebraic simplific ..."
Abstract

Cited by 73 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This talk reviews those efforts in automatic theorem proving, during the past few years, which have emphasized techniques other than resolution. These include: knowledge bases, natural deduction, reduction, (rewrite rules), typing, procedures, advice, controlled forward chaining, algebraic
Results 1  10
of
642,417