Results 1 - 10
of
176,550
Table 2: Methods success results.
2005
Cited by 1
Table 1: Success Analysis of Results Domain Success Analysis
1997
"... In PAGE 7: ... indicates improved result. Table1 analyses the success of using the data distribution method de ned in Sec- tion 3.2 to specify the intervals in continuous domains.... ..."
Cited by 1
Table 1: Success Analysis of Results Domain Success Analysis
1997
"... In PAGE 7: ... indicates improved result. Table1 analyses the success of using the data distribution method de ned in Sec- tion 3.2 to specify the intervals in continuous domains.... ..."
Cited by 1
Table 1: Success Analysis of Results Domain Success Analysis
"... In PAGE 6: ... 4.2 Results Table1 analyses the success of using the data distribution method de ned in Section 3.2 to specify the intervals in continuous domains.... ..."
Table 1: SVM Results (success).
2005
"... In PAGE 2: ...VM 3.00 package3. In addition, the two-class SVM was used with the unnormalised data as we have experimentally found that with normalised data the overall results were sig- nificantly worse. In Table1 we are able to observe that while the one-class SVM performs better with the RBF kernel, the two-class SVM is better with the linear kernel. In Table 2 Table 1: SVM Results (success).... ..."
Cited by 1
Table 8. Results (success ratios)
"... In PAGE 20: ... 11 shows some examples. For the tracking problem, Table8 shows the result of histogram backprojection and correlogram correction for the three test videos. These results clearly show that correlogram correction alleviates many of the problems associated with simple histogram backprojection.... ..."
Table 2 shows the disambiguation results (success rates) for
"... In PAGE 6: ...Table 2 shows the disambiguation results (success rates) for = L 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, and 1845, respectively. Table2 : Disambiguation Results (%) ! Words band cabinet court crane palm plant sentence slug tank trial Average 25 90.... In PAGE 6: ...0.3 82.9 81.9 89.2 90.3 67.6 57.4 83.3 73.1 92.5 79.1 As is seen in Table2 , the best result is 92.1% for = L 400 or 600, which is far better than that of Hiro, Wu and Furugori and better than many other experiments 2), 6), 16).... ..."
Table 14 Evaluation results for success rates.
1999
Cited by 48
Table 4 Success criteria review results.
"... In PAGE 8: ...in order to achieve the main goal. Table4 shows the results. This indicator provides an understanding of the performance analysis the group did during the group activity.... ..."
Table 8. Results (success ratios) for the tracking problem.
"... In PAGE 21: ... For the location problem, Table 7 shows the re- sults for 66 queries, and Figure 12 shows some examples. For the tracking problem, Table8 shows the re- sult of histogram backprojection and correlogram correction for the three test videos. These results clearly show that correlogram correction alleviates many of the problems associated with simple his- togram backprojection.... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
176,550