Results 1 - 10
of
55,258
Table 1: Flaws subsets size.
"... In PAGE 5: ... These five flaws have been selected by the industrial partner as the most critical for the production. To classify these anomalies and evaluate the performances of the final system, training and test sets were built from 1606 sound pieces and 245 defected pieces ( Table1 ). Since the number of available samples per categories of flaw is very small, a ten-fold cross validated error was used to evaluate the classification performances.... ..."
Table 2: Subset size and accuracy : Heart Disease
1997
Cited by 35
Table 3: Subset size and accuracy : LED
1997
Cited by 35
Table 8: Breakdown of subset sizes by document type.
1998
"... In PAGE 15: ... Figure 3: Interest themes over time for User A. 21 points have been plotted, representing the different themes over the time of the experiment (see Table8 ). For example the PAAM theme has nine points plotted for each of the time periods in which that theme appeared.... In PAGE 17: ... First, notice that the scale on the x axis is 1000 times that of the y axis. The point labels represent the time period that the theme first appeared ( Table8 ). This theme is quite constant from week 2 to week 7, then it moves away during weeks 8, 9 and 10.... ..."
Cited by 15
Table 4 Effect of increasing informant subset size
2006
"... In PAGE 5: ...Table4 ). This increase corresponds partly to the usage of distantly related informant species in the informant set.... ..."
Table 1. Results summary for feature subset size 60 according to significance.
2006
"... In PAGE 12: ... 6.2 Evaluation Summary We checked the significance of observed differences between GREEDY and CLUSTER, using a 2-tailed t-test with a 95% confidence level for feature subset size, a28 equal to 60 (see Table1 ). This test indicated that the superiority of CLUSTER over GREEDY was significant in all three datasets (bold font), but that of GREEDY on USREMAIL was not shown to be significant at this level.... ..."
Cited by 1
TABLE III COMPARISON OF SUBSET SIZE, DEPENDENCY VALUE, amp; RUN TIMES
Table 2: MSE comparison of MRX, QR amp; ORMP for the Boston dataset for varying subset sizes. Subset Methods
2002
"... In PAGE 15: ...14 Subset size (n) Normalized Residual Error ORMP MRX QR Figure 5: Convergence of the averaged residual error using greedy algorithms on the Boston dataset. Figure 5 and Table2 show the convergence trends of the residual error and the mean square testing error, respectively, as the subset size is increased, for the Boston dataset. The trends shown are averaged over 100 random splits of the mother data into a training set of 481 and a testing set... ..."
Cited by 15
Table 2: MSE comparison of MRX, QR amp; ORMP for the Boston dataset for varying subset sizes. Subset Methods
2002
"... In PAGE 15: ...14 Subset size (n) Normalized Residual Error ORMP MRX QR Figure 5: Convergence of the averaged residual error using greedy algorithms on the Boston dataset. Figure 5 and Table2 show the convergence trends of the residual error and the mean square testing error, respectively, as the subset size is increased, for the Boston dataset. The trends shown are averaged over 100 random splits of the mother data into a training set of 481 and a testing set... ..."
Cited by 15
Table 2. Classification accuracy for feature subset selection Feature Subset Size Classifier Accuracy
"... In PAGE 5: ... Furthermore, we presented a novel feature subset selection strategy that minimized the feature space without the loss of information. Table2 indicates that through the first pass of our feature subset selection strategy we managed to reduce the feature set from 254 moments to a much smaller feature subset comprising just 47 salient moments, whilst achieving a slight increase in the classification accuracy. The second pass of our feature subset selection strategy, involves the use of a Markov Blanket as a filter model to the 47 features.... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
55,258