• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 4,908
Next 10 →

Table 4. Mean square errors: stock variable, stochastic trend

in Modelling Cyclical Behaviour with Differential-Difference Equations in an Unobserved Components Framework
by Marcus J. Chambers, Joanne S. Mcgarry

Table 5. Mean square errors: ow variable, stochastic trend

in Modelling Cyclical Behaviour with Differential-Difference Equations in an Unobserved Components Framework
by Marcus J. Chambers, Joanne S. Mcgarry

Table 4: Maximum Likelihood Estimates for the Smooth Stochastic Trend Model (Dependent Variable: Capital Productivity, West Germany) Estimated Coefficients of the Final State Vector

in Measuring The German Output Gap Using Unobserved Component Models
by Michael Funke, Sussex Place
"... In PAGE 20: ... In this paper, I use the UC model to calculate a continuous slowdown in capital productivity, as opposed to one-time events. Table4 provides parameter estimates and Figure 6 and 7 plot the estimated trend and cyclical component. The estimates indicate that the model is well- determined.... ..."

Table 3: Maximum Likelihood Estimates for the Smooth Stochastic Trend Model (Dependent Variable: lnGDP constant 1991 prices, quarterly data, 1968:1 - 1995:4) Estimated Coefficients of the Final State Vector

in Measuring The German Output Gap Using Unobserved Component Models
by Michael Funke, Sussex Place
"... In PAGE 13: ....2. The German Output Gap Calculated from Quarterly GDP I now turn to an analysis of the quarterly output gap. Details of the results of fitting the UC model for quarterly German GDP are shown in Table3 . Signal extraction carried out using the Kalman filter and smoothing algorithms leads to the various components in Figure 3 to 5.... ..."

Table 2.3 Cointegration with restricted intercepts and no trends in the VAR Cointegration LR Test Based on Trace of the Stochastic Matrix 25 observations from 1981 to 2005. Order of VAR = 1.

in Members
by M. R. Khurana, Manju Jaidka (editor, Anil Raina (english, Dharmanand Sharma (philosophy, Jagmohan Chopra (hindi, Rajesh Gill (sociology, Asha Rani, Manju Jaidka
"... In PAGE 17: ... While the differences between the farm and the non-farm sectors come up fairly clearly, there is much that needs to be explored further within the vastly heterogeneous non-farm sector. Table2 moves one step forward in that direction and informs us of the educational background of workers engaged in the nine broad sectors of the Indian economy. As in Table 1, here too, a three-layered educational classification of workers (non-iterate, semi-educated and educated) is adopted.... In PAGE 17: ... Again, the picture relates to the aggregate of workers; male-female and rural-urban differences are not considered. Table2 throws up many interesting insights about the non-farm sectors. First, the proportion of non-literate workers has witnessed a varying degree of decline, first between 1983 and 1993-94, and then between 1993-94 and 2004-05, in each sector of the Indian economy, including agriculture.... In PAGE 122: ... Here, we use FDI as the dependent variable and the seven variables (GDP, Openness, Debt/ GDP ratio, Foreign Exchange Reserves, REER, DTSER/Export and Infra/GDP) as the independent predictor variables. Table2 depicts the summary results of multiple regression model and F ratios were found significant at one per cent level in all the five models, which implies the existence of linear relationship between the independent variables and foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows in India. Hence, there is a strong evidence of a linear relationship between FDI and economic variables.... In PAGE 124: ...997 0.000 Predictors:(constant) GDP, openness, DEBT/GDP, FOREX, REER, 1 DTSER/ Export, Infrastructure Predictors:(constant) GDP, openness, DEBT/GDP, FOREX, REER, 2 Infrastructure 3 Predictors:(constant) GDP, openness, FOREX, REER, Infrastructure 4 Predictors:(constant) GDP, FOREX, REER, Infrastructure 5 Predictors:(constant) GDP, FOREX, REER 6 Dependent Variable: FDI Inflows in India Table2 offers that the values of Adjusted Coefficient of determination (R2) and R2 without adjustment are above 0.... ..."

Table 2.2 Cointegration with restricted intercepts and no trends in the VAR Cointegration LR Test Based on Maximal Eigenvalue of the Stochastic Matrix 25 observations from 1981 to 2005. Order of VAR = 1.

in Members
by M. R. Khurana, Manju Jaidka (editor, Anil Raina (english, Dharmanand Sharma (philosophy, Jagmohan Chopra (hindi, Rajesh Gill (sociology, Asha Rani, Manju Jaidka
"... In PAGE 17: ... While the differences between the farm and the non-farm sectors come up fairly clearly, there is much that needs to be explored further within the vastly heterogeneous non-farm sector. Table2 moves one step forward in that direction and informs us of the educational background of workers engaged in the nine broad sectors of the Indian economy. As in Table 1, here too, a three-layered educational classification of workers (non-iterate, semi-educated and educated) is adopted.... In PAGE 17: ... Again, the picture relates to the aggregate of workers; male-female and rural-urban differences are not considered. Table2 throws up many interesting insights about the non-farm sectors. First, the proportion of non-literate workers has witnessed a varying degree of decline, first between 1983 and 1993-94, and then between 1993-94 and 2004-05, in each sector of the Indian economy, including agriculture.... In PAGE 122: ... Here, we use FDI as the dependent variable and the seven variables (GDP, Openness, Debt/ GDP ratio, Foreign Exchange Reserves, REER, DTSER/Export and Infra/GDP) as the independent predictor variables. Table2 depicts the summary results of multiple regression model and F ratios were found significant at one per cent level in all the five models, which implies the existence of linear relationship between the independent variables and foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows in India. Hence, there is a strong evidence of a linear relationship between FDI and economic variables.... In PAGE 124: ...997 0.000 Predictors:(constant) GDP, openness, DEBT/GDP, FOREX, REER, 1 DTSER/ Export, Infrastructure Predictors:(constant) GDP, openness, DEBT/GDP, FOREX, REER, 2 Infrastructure 3 Predictors:(constant) GDP, openness, FOREX, REER, Infrastructure 4 Predictors:(constant) GDP, FOREX, REER, Infrastructure 5 Predictors:(constant) GDP, FOREX, REER 6 Dependent Variable: FDI Inflows in India Table2 offers that the values of Adjusted Coefficient of determination (R2) and R2 without adjustment are above 0.... ..."

Table 1. List of existing software packages for structural reliability and stochastic mechanics

in On general purpose software in structural reliability
by G. I. Schuëller, M. F. Pellissetti
"... In PAGE 4: ... Over the past two decades various software packages featuring stochastic methods have been developed and applied to numerous problems of academic and engineering interest. A list of existing packages has been compiled in Table1 . Of course great heterogeneity exists in the arena of the available software tools: the differences range from the width of applicability to the setting in which the software is developed, i.... In PAGE 5: ...arty packages. Some can handle both. This aspect has been included in the compilation of existing structural-reliability packages (cf. Table1 ). This highlights an important issue for any user of the engineering practice: the possibility and necessity of interaction with external software tools.... In PAGE 5: ... 3.5 CURRENT TRENDS For the purpose of this paper, a list of software packages capable of structural reliability and stochastic uncertainty analysis has been compiled in Table1 . Based on this list, a few trends can be observed with respect to the development of software capable of dealing with uncertainty.... ..."

Table 3: Compensation Function. Percentage increase of consumption in all states and dates to make the representative agent indi erent between a non-stochastic economy and a stochastic economy. Preference parameters were chosen to match the indicated market price of risk, M.P.R., and risk-free rate, E[rf]. `| apos; indicates combination not feasible for lt; 1.(See Table 2) Panel (a): random walk economy; Panel (b): trend stationary economy

in Risk-Sensitive Real Business Cycles
by Thomas D. Tallarini, Jr. 2000
"... In PAGE 9: ... Given these ( ; ) pairs, I calculate the welfare cost of uctuations. Table3 reports the amount consumption would have to be increased in all dates and states, in percentage terms, to make consumers indi erent between a deterministic consumption process and what we actually observe. In computing these costs, I assume that preferences are described by the parameter values in Table 2.... ..."
Cited by 9

Table 1 Tests for a Unit Root or Trend Stationarity in U.S. Real GDP Annual data; Maddison (1995) AR Test Nominal Step Dummy

in The Uncertain Trend in U.S. GDP
by Christian J. Murray, Neil Ericsson, Jon Faust, Chang-jin Kim, John Rogers, Richard Startz, Chris Weber, David Wilcox, Eric Zivot, Charles R. Nelson, Charles R. Nelson
"... In PAGE 3: .... Trends and Non-homogeneity in U.S. real GDP The evidence against the stochastic trend view is reflected in the test statistics shown in Table1 for the annual U.S.... In PAGE 5: ... Therefore, in contrast to the Dickey-Fuller test, there does not exist a set of results which guarantees that inference based on the Leybourne-McCabe test is asymptotically unaffected by data-based lag selection. Results of these tests are reported in Table1 for the full Maddison sample and the sub-period 1909-1970 studied by Nelson and Plosser. The lag length is chosen alternatively by GS and Schwarz apos; (1978) information criteria (SIC).... In PAGE 12: ... Rejection rates differ sharply depending on which lag selection method is used. GS generally chooses a much larger value of k than does SIC, reflecting the contrast we saw in Table1 . It also appears that the particular pattern of real GDP during the period 1930-45 as opposed to the random outcomes of the AR(2) process do matter; the tendency to stronger rejection of the unit root in the longer sample being more apparent for the fixed pattern.... ..."

Table 6 Standard Deviations and Correlation Matrix for the Detrended Industrial Production Series

in Is Europe An Optimum Currency Area? Business Cycles In The EU
by Guglielmo Maria Caporale, Nikitas Pittis
"... In PAGE 15: ... This filtering, however, although resulting in stationarity, does not entirely remove the stochastic trend, since the innovations of the random walk are a component of the first differenced series (see equation 6). The matrix of correlation coefficients is given in Table6 . There is a strong positive correlation among all the European countries, except the UK, and zero or negative correlations between any pair of European and non-European countries.... ..."
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 4,908
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University