Results 1 - 10 of 796

Table 3 Step-by-step illustration of the iterative estimation.

in Ratio-Based Decisions and the Quantitative Analysis of cDNA Microarray Images
by Yidong Chen, Edward R. Dougherty, Michael L. Bittner

Table 3: Step-by-Step Output of the Iterative Algorithm

in Points-to Analysis for Java with Applications to Loop Optimizations
by Peng Wu, Paul Feautrier, David Padua, Zehra Sura

Table 1. Step-by-step process towards designing semantic structures for e-government services

in Designing Semantic eGovernment Services Driven by User Requirements
by Ralf Klischewski, Stefan Ukena 2007
Cited by 1

Table 3.1. Step-by-step time savings for retirement pensions

in Good Governance for Development (GfD) in Arab Countries Working Group 2 on E-government and Administrative Simplification High Level Seminar on Measuring and Evaluating E-government and 3 rd Working Group Meeting DOC N4 THE BUSINESS CASE FOR E-GOVERNMENT
by United Arab Emirates 2007

Table 5 shows a typical interaction between the robot and user, in terms of the observations received by the controller, and the actions selected in response, as well as the corre- sponding reward signals. Step-by-step images correspond- ing to this interaction are shown in Figure 5.

in Policy-Contingent Abstraction for Robust Robot Control
by Joelle Pineau , Geoff Gordon, Sebastian Thrun 2003
Cited by 10

Table 12: Average evaluation values in the two-step input method and the step-by-step input method by the subjects who had never composed MIDI sequence data with the step-by-step input method of sequencing software.

in A concept to facilitate musical expression
by Chika Oshima, Kazushi Nishimoto, Yohei Miyagawa, Takashi Shirosaki 2002
Cited by 2

Table 6: Average evaluation values for the two-step input method and the step-by-step input method by the subjects who did correct fingering.

in A concept to facilitate musical expression
by Chika Oshima, Kazushi Nishimoto, Yohei Miyagawa, Takashi Shirosaki 2002
Cited by 2

Table 10: Average evaluation values in the two-step input method and the step-by-step input method by the subjects who had previously composed MIDI sequence data with the step-by-step input method of some sequencing software. Three asterisks (***) indicate a significant difference at 1%. Two asterisks (**) indicate a significant difference at 5%.

in A concept to facilitate musical expression
by Chika Oshima, Kazushi Nishimoto, Yohei Miyagawa, Takashi Shirosaki 2002
Cited by 2

TABLE 3 describes the results of the step-by-step shape monitoring of the partially reconstructed mandible at various stages of reconstruction. At each stage, both shape constraints (defined in Section 5) are satisfied with a choice of q = 0.01. Thus, we proceed with the best solution of the MWGM algorithm to complete the registration of all five fracture surface pairs.

in Virtual Craniofacial Reconstruction from Computed Tomography Image Sequences Exhibiting Multiple Fractures
by A. S. Chowdhury, S. M. Bh, R. W. Robinson, J. C. Yu 2006
"... In PAGE 4: ... Each of the later five rows shows the same three images with a new pair of fracture surfaces registered at each stage. TABLE3 . Results of Shape Monitoring (A = (2I g - Of,g)/ 2 Ig)... ..."
Cited by 1

Table 8: Average evaluation values for the two-step input method and the step-by-step input method by the subjects who did incorrect fingering. Three asterisks (***) indicate a significant difference at 1%. Two asterisks (**) indicate a significant difference at 5%.

in A concept to facilitate musical expression
by Chika Oshima, Kazushi Nishimoto, Yohei Miyagawa, Takashi Shirosaki 2002
Cited by 2
Results 1 - 10 of 796