• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 15,744
Next 10 →

Table 7: Social Relative

in Agrarian Structure in Poland - The Myth of Large-Farm Superiority
by Johan van Zyl, Bill R. Miller, Andrew Parker, Wp G

Table 2. Characteristics and elements of structures used to represent indexing as sen through framework

in Social Tagging and the Next Steps for Indexing
by Joseph T. Tennis 2006
"... In PAGE 5: ... Social tagging and subject cataloguing use different structures, and it is this point that allows us to see many differences. In Table2 we see twelve characteristics or elements of indexing structures. These characteristics and elements offer us a way making comparative statements about tags and subject headings in these two types of indexing.... ..."
Cited by 3

Table 7. Discursive components used to compare social taging and subject cataloguing

in Social Tagging and the Next Steps for Indexing
by Joseph T. Tennis 2006
"... In PAGE 9: ... They talk about management and sharing of documents or tags. Table7 outlines the discursive contours of these frameworks. In this table, we are concerned with the scope, authority, and technique of these examples of indexing.... ..."
Cited by 3

Table 5: Household Welfare and Social Capital: Disaggregating the Social Capital Index

in Social capital, household welfare, and poverty
by Christiaan Grootaert, Young Lee, Deepa Narayan, Lant Pritchett 1998
"... In PAGE 32: ... Table5 suggests that the benefits from participating in internally heterogeneous associations are higher than from associations whose members are more alike. The reasons for this may have to do with the exchanges of knowledge and information that occur among members.... In PAGE 48: ... We try to tackle this question in two ways. As a first approach, we added to the basic specification of Table5 a dummy variable for each village (minus one omitted village), under the assumption that these variables capture all omitted relevant village factors.... In PAGE 54: ... Annex tables A1 to A7 further break down the social capital dimensions according to type of association and household characteristics.28 In order to test how the importance of each social capital dimension varies with type of institution, we split each of the seven social capital variables in the basic model specification ( Table5 ) into four variables, by type of association. This presents a problem for the heterogeneity index, the index of active participation in decision making and the two membership dues variables, because this information is only available for the three associations which the household listed as most important.... ..."
Cited by 7

Table 3. Discourse in indexing as a framework

in Social Tagging and the Next Steps for Indexing
by Joseph T. Tennis 2006
"... In PAGE 6: ... Work proceses of indexing as sen through framework analysis Structures in Indexing 1 Type of Control (policy?) 2 Degre of Control (institution/personal) 3 Fredom from Control (work within or outside of vocab?) 4 Type of Combination (pre or post?) 5 Composition of Vocabulary (warant?) 6 Consistency of Vocabulary 7 Specificity of Descriptors 8 Levels of Hierarchy 9 Lead-in Vocabulary 10 Syndetic Structure 1 Definitions/Scope Notes 12 Purpose(s) Table 2. Characteristics and elements of structures used to represent indexing as sen through framework analysis In Table3 we see six components of indexing discourse. These components of discourse, when cast as a rubric here, allow us to categorize discourse surrounding the practice of social tagging and subject cataloguing.... ..."
Cited by 3

Table 3: GroupMe! tagging design in comparison to other social tagging systems. And user incentives in terms of tagging.

in A NOVEL APPROACH TO SOCIAL TAGGING: GROUPME! Enhancing Social Tagging Systems with Groups
by Fabian Abel, Nicola Henze, Daniel Krause
"... In PAGE 6: ...etes with systems like BibSonomy, del.icio.us or Flickr. Table3 summarizes some characteristics of GroupMe! according to the dimensions in the tagging system design taxonomy developed in (Marlow et al., 2006a), and compares them with related tagging sys-... In PAGE 7: ... Object type. GroupMe! is the only system listed in Table3 that supports tagging of resources dis- played in a multimedia fashion. Although sys- tems like del.... ..."

Table 4.8: Social tagging of eight artists

in A Mood-Based Music Classification and Exploration System
by Owen Craigie Meyers, Barry Vercoe, Owen Craigie Meyers 2007

Table 2: The index of the types of tagging errors

in unknown title
by unknown authors

TABLE 1 COMPOSITION OF THE SOCIAL EXCLUSION/INCLUSION INDEX

in Mapping Social Exclusion/Inclusion in Developing Countries: Social Dynamics of So Paulo in the 1990s
by Gilberto Camara, Gilberto Câmara, Antonio Miguel Monteiro, Frederico Ramos, Aldaiza Sposati, Dirce Koga 2004
Cited by 3

TABLE 1 SOCIAL SCIENCE CITATION INDEX, 1973-1998

in Which Enlightenment, Whose Liberali...
by Be Ra Li, Friedrich A. Hayek
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 15,744
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University