Results 1 - 10
of
24,124
Table 4. Increased time complexity by multiple model setting (in SUN SPARC-II workstation) Single model MPP-HMM
2001
"... In PAGE 12: ...30 % 93.16 % D : external duration model, T : structural state-tying Table4 shows the increment of time complexity due to multiple models. Since search space of the recognition network broadened by the multiple model setting, average time for character recognition was ... ..."
Cited by 9
Table 5 Sequential comparison of the additive Schwarz preconditioner(OSM) with the global ILU(k), k = 0;...; 5, preconditioners on a single processor Sun workstation. The ne mesh is 256 256. The speci cations of OSM are: 8 subdomains, 3h overlap, 7 8 coarse grid, and ILU(5) as the subdomain solver. GMRES and EXEC are as in Tables 1{3. MEM is the total memory needed to store the preconditioning matrix in Megabytes.
"... In PAGE 15: ...ith tests of Schwarz preconditioning against the popular global ILU(k), k = 0; . . .5, family of preconditioners on a non-dedicated single-processor SUN SPARCstation with 512MB of memory. The results are summarized in Table5 . Because of the overlap and the coarse solve, the Schwarz preconditioner needs more memory, even if all subdomain problems are solved inexactly with ILU(5), than the other global ILU(k) preconditioners.... In PAGE 16: ...in this paper that is already in the local domain of convergence on the nest grid. (Observe, for instance, that the number of Newton steps required on M1 = 0:8 problem the 256 256 grid in Table5 , is roughly half that of the corresponding problem on the 512 512 grid in Table 3. If the shock is correctly located on a (relatively) coarse grid, the plateau of Fig.... ..."
TABLE 5 Sequential comparison of the additive Schwarz preconditioner (OSM) with the global ILU(k), k =0;:::;5, preconditioners on a single-processor Sun workstation. The ne mesh is 256 256. The speci cations of OSM are: 8 subdomains, 3h overlap, 7 8 coarse grid, and ILU(5) as the subdomain solver. GMRES and EXEC are as in Tables 1{3. MEM is the total memory needed to store the preconditioning matrix in megabytes.
1998
Cited by 40
Table 6: Sample timings of various image understanding applications run on the CAAPP instruction-level simulator and the generice SIMD array virtual machine emulator. \Platform quot; refers to the workstation used: 1 is a Sun Sparc2; 2 is a single node of a Sun Sparc20-514.
"... In PAGE 18: ... We have found that the virtual machine emulation of typical image understanding applications takes from a few seconds to a few minutes and from 30 to 487 times faster than on the CAAPP instruction-level simulator. A sample of these results is shown in Table6 . The applications are described in [14].... ..."
Cited by 1
Table 1: Comparison of execution times of the two data layout approaches that provide optimal solutions based on 0{1 integer programming techniques. y Excludes the initialization time for the performance estimation machine model (training sets). z Time includes solution of two 0{1 integer programming formulations of the inter{procedural alignment problem.
1998
"... In PAGE 18: ...Table1 shows the execution times of prototype implementations of their ap- proaches in seconds for three benchmark programs. The timings were taken on single processor SUN workstations.... ..."
Cited by 10
Table 1: Comparison of execution times of the two data layout approaches that provide optimal solutions based on 0{1 integer programming techniques. y Excludes the initialization time for the performance estimation machine model (training sets). z Time includes solution of two 0{1 integer programming formulations of the inter{procedural alignment problem.
1998
"... In PAGE 18: ...Table1 shows the execution times of prototype implementations of their ap- proaches in seconds for three benchmark programs. The timings were taken on single processor SUN workstations.... ..."
Cited by 10
Table 2: Increment of complexity (in SUN SPARC-II workstation)
2001
"... In PAGE 9: ... Table2 shows the increment of complexity due to multiple models. The number of models was increased about 2.... In PAGE 9: ... As a result, the number of free parameters for the observation probability distributions becomes almost the same as that of the single model setting. Next, the third row of Table2 shows the increment of time complexity. Since search space of the recognition network broadened by the multiple model setting, average time for character recognition was increased about 2 times.... ..."
Cited by 9
Table 4: Timings in seconds on an Ultra 10 workstation with d=2
"... In PAGE 27: ...5 Table 3: Average iteration counts for Problem A with c gt;0 Therefore we restrict attention to d=2, and we assume that all distances between interpolation points are stored by the preliminary work, because they are required by every iteration. Some timings in seconds for the iterative algorithm and for the direct method are given in Table4 . All the calculations were programmed in Fortran 77, they were run on a Sun Ultra 10 workstation, and the times were measured by the DTIME instruction of the Sun Fortran Library.... In PAGE 27: ... All the calculations were programmed in Fortran 77, they were run on a Sun Ultra 10 workstation, and the times were measured by the DTIME instruction of the Sun Fortran Library. Separate measure- ments of the preliminary work and of a single iteration are reported in Table4 , the values of n and q being taken from Table 3. The table shows also the total times when the iterative algorithm is applied to two versions of Problem A, the positive value of c being 2 (1=n)1=d.... ..."
Table 6.1: Estimated computation costs for all stages in the m-rep model computation scheme, measured per object or per population (pop.). The costs are computed for a single gure m-rep model. The computation time is independent of the number of gures with the exceptions of steps L, M, N and O, which are scaled linearly with the number of gures. The computation platform is a SUN Sparc Ultra 10 workstation with 750 MB of memory (i.e., large enough to t the process)
2001
Cited by 6
Table 4: Single Stage Results with Preordering - 8 orders
in Effective Continuous-Time Formulation for Short-Term Scheduling: 3. Multiple Intermediate Due Dates
1998
Cited by 19
Results 1 - 10
of
24,124