### Table 9: Matrix SHERMAN/SHERMAN2

2000

Cited by 2

### Table 9: Matrix SHERMAN/SHERMAN2

2000

Cited by 2

### Table 5. Abundances with respect to Morrison amp; McCammon (1983)

1997

"... In PAGE 10: ...as a factor 1.5 lower iron abundance (see section 5.2), in both the plasma and reflection codes. Details of some of these ts are given in Table5 . We rst allow the line to scale independently of the reflection continuum, and the re- flection spectrum abundances to scale independently of the hot plasma.... ..."

### Table 3: Number of iterations for SHERMANx, using cgs and varying ( =0:1). SHERMAN1 SHERMAN3 SHERMAN5

"... In PAGE 14: ... SHERMAN5: a fully implicit black oil simulator, 16 23 3 grid, 3 unknowns, n = 3; 312 and nz =20; 793. Table3 indicates the convergence results for cgs solver and varying on 8 PEs. Again, the dependency on the parameter is signi cant.... ..."

### Table 2: Levenberg-Morrison-Marquardt trust region method on Example 1

2001

"... In PAGE 13: ... We solved problem (2:3) using the code LMDER from the MINPACK package [11] which implements the Levenberg-Morrison-Marquardt method, using again the starting point (1:7; 0:1). In Table2 we report whether the step reduced the merit function kF k su ciently and was accepted (Acc), or whether it was rejected (Rej); the value of the merit function; and the \Levenberg-Marquardt quot; parameter chosen by the algorithm, which is the value of in (2:31). We also report the eigenvalues of (F 0 k)T F 0 k (eig).... ..."

Cited by 8

### Table 4.1: Descriptive statistics for LogF for Morrison and Ellis (1995) stimuli for Experiments 1,3,5

### Table 4.3: Part of original correlation matrix presented by Morrison et al. (1992) with LogF values added

### Table 3: Three-Year Survival of Breast Cancer Patients According to Degree of Chronic In ammatory Reaction, Nuclear Grade, Age and Diagnostic Center (see Morrison et al. 1973).

1998

"... In PAGE 17: ... The data were originally provided by Alan Morrison (see Morrison et al. 1973) and are here reproduced in Table3 . In this study, survival after three years was recorded for each of a number of breast cancer patients at three di erent diagnostic centers.... In PAGE 19: ... Table 4 presents a summary of several combinations of the three relevant variables (age, survival, and histology). Table 4: Summary of di erent tests run on data from Table3 . Diagnostic Centers are Tokyo (T ), Boston (B), and Glamorgan (G).... ..."

Cited by 6

### Table 2 Sherman3, 20033 nonzeros, ILU(0), a = log kb ? Axkk2 BiCGstab(`)

"... In PAGE 24: ... In that case, solving the LS-problem with an LD2LT decomposition may help to reduce the e ects of near singularities. In Table2 we illustrate this for the Sherman3 test matrix. The results in this Table show the accuracy level (a) of a speci c implementation and the number of MVs for which this accuracy level is attained.... ..."

Cited by 1

### Table 8: Solution times for various methods for SHERMAN3 with pILU(0.0625)

1995

"... In PAGE 19: ... BiCGSTAB and GMRES(53) need about twice as many sparse matrix vector multiplications. If we consider the solution times achieved on the Alliant FX/80, which are given in Table8... ..."

Cited by 6