doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 This information is current as of October 2006. High-resolution figures, a citation map, links to PubMed and Google Scholar, etc., can be found at: www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/101/suppl_1/5228 This article cites 7 articles, 1 of which you can access for free at: www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/101/suppl_1/5228#BIBL This article has been cited by other articles: www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/101/suppl_1/5228#otherarticles Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article- sign up in the box at the top right corner of the article or click here. To reproduce this article in part (figures, tables) or in entirety, see: www.pnas.org/misc/rightperm.shtml To order reprints, see: www.pnas.org/misc/reprints.shtml

Scientists need new tools to explore and browse large collections of scholarly literature. Thanks to organizations such as JSTOR, which scan and index the original bound archives of many journals, modern scientists can search digital libraries spanning hundreds of years. A scientist, suddenly

An interesting twist of the Hirsch index is given, in terms of an index for topics and compounds. By comparing both the hb index and m for a number of compounds and topics, it can be used to differentiate between a new so-called hot topic with older topics. This quick method is shown to help new

and stability of information on scientific topics, especially those with associated political controversy. Here we present an analysis of the Wikipedia edit histories for seven scientific articles and show that topics we consider politically but not scientifically “controversial ” (such as evolution and global

In an increasing number of scientific disciplines, large data collections are emerging as important community resources. In this paper, we introduce design principles for a data management architecture called the Data Grid. We describe two basic services that we believe are fundamental

This essay provides a perspective on the trend towards integrating psychology into economics. Some topics are discussed, and arguments are provided for why movement towards greater psychological realism in economics will improve mainstream economics.

In a 1935 paper, and in his book Theory of Probability, Jeffreys developed a methodology for quantifying the evidence in favor of a scientific theory. The centerpiece was a number, now called the Bayes factor, which is the posterior odds of the null hypothesis when the prior probability on the null

This paper provides a tutorial introduction to visual servo control of robotic manipulators. Since the topic spans many disciplines our goal is limited to providing a basic conceptual framework. We begin by reviewing the prerequisite topics from robotics and computer vision, including a brief

relevant to data stream systems and current projects in the area, the paper explores topics in stream query languages, new requirements and challenges in query processing, and algorithmic issues.

I begin this essay by reflecting on my early paper (Nelson, 1859), and Ken’s (Arrow, 1962), as period pieces. These papers certainly have been influential in shaping the discussion of science and technology policy over the last forty years, at least among economists, but at the time they were written, economists were just beginning to get into analysis of the key processes and institutions involved in technological advance. A lot has been learned since that time, and the discussion has become much more sophisticated. I will highlight two of those intellectual developments: the growing recognition that technological advance must be understood as an evolutionary process, and recognition that the institutions involved in that process include much more than the simple market institutions on which economists usually focus. Then I turn to the contemporary policy arena that is the focus of this conference: issues relating to intellectual property. Both to link the discussion to my old paper, and because my own recent research has been focused there, I shall focus particularly on the patenting of “science”. Finally, I will consider the institutional division of labor in research and development, and argue that the question of what should be private and what should be public about science and technology cannot be explored adequately without explicit consideration of mechanisms of funding, and of who is expected to do the work under what terms. I will focus particularly on the role of universities in the system of institutions that do R and D. 2