"... In PAGE 8: ...implicitly inconsistent or implicitly accepted; an explicitly rejected formula may be either implicitly inconsistent or implicitly rejected; an explicitly inconsistent formula must be implicitly inconsistent; an explicitly independent formula may be either implicitly inconsistent, or implicitly accepted, or implicitly rejected, or implicitly independent. Table1 shows that there are 9 different epistemic attitudes of any formula A of L for a formal theory TL(P). We show all possible different changes of these epistemic attitudes of A in the Appendix.... ..."

"... In PAGE 8: ...143 According to the above definitions, an explicitly accepted formula may be either implicitly inconsistent or implicitly accepted; an explicitly rejected formula may be either implicitly inconsistent or implicitly rejected; an explicitly inconsistent formula must be implicitly inconsistent; an explicitly independent formula may be either implicitly inconsistent, or implicitly accepted, or implicitly rejected, or implicitly independent. Table1 shows that there are 9 different epistemic attitudes of any formula A of L for a formal theory TL(P). We show all possible different changes of these epistemic attitudes of A in the Appendix.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... According to the above definitions, an explicitly accepted formula may be either implicitly inconsistent or implicitly accepted; an explicitly rejected formula may be either implicitly inconsistent or implicitly rejected; an explicitly inconsistent formula must be implicitly inconsistent; an explicitly independent formula may be either implicitly inconsistent, or implicitly accepted, or implicitly rejected, or implicitly independent. Table1 shows that there are 9 different epistemic attitudes of any formula A of L for a formal theory TL(P). 4.... ..."

"... In PAGE 11: ...1. The share of serials in all references In Table2 the subject areas are ranked by the share of serials in the references. Clearly three cluster groups can be distinguished: first a group with a share level roughly between 83% and 95% of serials in all references.... In PAGE 12: ... The detailed findings for the selected clusters here fit within in the picture of the overall databases. Table2 can also be read as a ranked list of the relevance of journal publications for the science communication in the respective fields. Thus, immunology would be the field where journal publications have the highest relevance for communicating research results, while in history and philosophy of science and social sciences the relevance would be much lower.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... We believe that the way research is presented and material taught will change significantly in the life sciences and all other disciplines in the years to come. Table1 provides further examples of the use of multimedia in the life sci- ences, and the list is continually growing. We encourage the readers to try using multimedia to see for themselves.... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ... Table2 represents the epistemic states of the two consultants. The epis- temological picture here is that the agents have three grades of propositions: evidence, beliefs and judgements.... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ...any definition of independence or relevance in such a framework can be expressed in terms of five basic notions corresponding to the possible effects of learning A on the belief status of C ( Table1 ). As already said an important distinction has to be made between propositions C that are a priori believed and those which are a priori ignored.... In PAGE 11: ... But since (A^:C) lt; (A^C), it comes max( (A^C); (:A^C)) = (:A^:C) gt; (A ^ :C). Figure 1 is the counterpart of Table1 . It exhaustively summarizes the various cases of relevance and independence that can be expressed in an ordinal setting.... ..."

"... In PAGE 11: ... The first type of analysis, and the more common in energy research, is one that pursues advancing knowledge through methods such as field observation (whether anecdotal or formal), surveys, interviews, and the like. The second, that which we address through our example deconstructions, is a mode of critical analysis intended to draw attention to the mental models and institutional structures that characterize much of current energy research and policy: what stories ( true or not) are told, what is assumed, and what is missed? Table1 gives a few examples of social science-based questions of the first type, relevant to the energy performance of commercial buildings, along with corresponding engineering-based questions. In looking at these questions the defining difference is that the engineering questions are usually focused on determining energy flows and systems behavior whereas the social science questions seek to uncover distinctions among people that might potentially affect building design and operation.... ..."