Results 1 - 10 of 51,372

Table I. A Classification of Current Peer-to-Peer Systems (RM: Resource Management; CR: Censorship Resistance; PS: Performance and Scalability; SPE: Security, Privacy and Encryption; A: Anonymity; RA: Reputation and Accountability; RT: Resource Trading.)

in A survey of peer-to-peer content distribution technologies
by Stephanos Androutsellis-theotokis, Diomidis Spinellis 2004
Cited by 96

Table 1: Features and properties of related peer-to-peer systems.

in A distributed, value-oriented XML store
by Tine Thorn, Anders Baumann, Mikkel Fennestad, Peter Sestoft
"... In PAGE 5: ... The XML Store, CFS, PAST and OceanStore all scale well, due to the routing and location schemes that they use. Table1 gives an overview of the most important prop- erties and features of the discussed peer-to-peer systems CFS, PAST, OceanStore, Napster, Gnutella and the XML Store. A more detailed survey of related work in the field of peer-to-peer storage systems can be found in [20].... ..."

Table 1: Features and properties of related peer-to-peer systems.

in A peer-to-peer, value-oriented XML Store
by Tine Thorn, Anders Baumann, Mikkel Fennestad, Peter Sestoft
"... In PAGE 3: ... The XML Store, CFS, PAST and OceanStore all scale well, due to the routing and location schemes that they use. Table1 gives an overview of the most important properties and features of the discussed peer-to-peer systems CFS, PAST, OceanStore, Napster, Gnutella and the XML Store. A more detailed survey of related work in the field of peer-to-peer storage systems can be found in [20].... ..."

Table 10. Comparison of Different Peer-to-Peer File System

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2005
Cited by 4

Table 1: Comparison between expected performance of several peer-to-peer systems

in Survey on distributed hash tables
by Filipe Araújo, Luís Rodrigues 2006

Tables. In Proc. of the 4th International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2005.

in Dynamic load balancing . . .
by Miroslaw Korzeniowski 2005

Table 3.1: Overview of Schema-Based Peer-to-Peer Systems

in ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
by Von Fakultät, Elektrotechnik Informatik, Doktor Der Naturwissenschaften, Ko-referenten Prof, Dr. Karl Aberer, Prof Dr, Udo Lipeck, Pirkei Avot 2006

Table 1: Observed session times in various peer-to-peer systems. The median session time ranges from an hour to a minute.

in Handling Churn in a DHT
by Sean Rhea, Dennis Geels, Timothy Roscoe, John Kubiatowicz 2004
"... In PAGE 4: ...1 Empirical studies Elsewhere [23] we have surveyed published studies of de- ployed file-sharing networks. Table1 shows a summary of observed session times. At first sight, some of these values are surprising, and may be due to methodological problems with the study in question or malfunctioning of the system under observation.... ..."
Cited by 191

Table 1: Observed session times in various peer-to-peer systems. The median session time ranges from an hour to a minute.

in Handling Churn in a DHT
by Sean Rhea, Dennis Geels, Timothy Roscoe, John Kubiatowicz 2004
"... In PAGE 4: ...1 Empirical studies Elsewhere [23] we have surveyed published studies of de- ployed file-sharing networks. Table1 shows a summary of observed session times. At first sight, some of these values are surprising, and may be due to methodological problems with the study in question or malfunctioning of the system under observation.... ..."
Cited by 191

Table 1: Observed session times in various peer-to-peer systems. The median session time ranges from an hour to a minute.

in Handling Churn in a DHT
by Sean Rhea, Sean Rhea, Dennis Geels, Dennis Geels, Timothy Roscoe, Timothy Roscoe, John Kubiatowicz, John Kubiatowicz 2004
Cited by 191
Results 1 - 10 of 51,372