Results 1 - 10 of 14,432

TABLE I1 Selection of high affinity a5pI ligands The phage pool selected by RGD peptide elution (Table I) was incu- bated in microtiter wells coated with decreasing concentrations of asp1. Quantitation of the phage bound indicated that the minimum coating concentration of integrin that yielded phage binding over background was 100 ng/ml. Twenty clones were sequenced from the phage bound to that well. The number of clones encoding the same peptide is shown in parentheses.

in unknown title
by unknown authors

Table 5.4: 68% confidence intervals of training RMSE values for benchmark data sets. Model M5D M5R RGD EMH EMU

in EMPRR: A High-dimensional EM-Based Piecewise Regression Algorithm
by Manimozhiyan Arumugam, Adviser Stephen, D. Scott, Manimozhiyan Arumugam M. S 2003

Table 5.5: 68% confidence intervals of test RMSE values for benchmark data sets. Model M5D M5R RGD EMH EMU

in EMPRR: A High-dimensional EM-Based Piecewise Regression Algorithm
by Manimozhiyan Arumugam, Adviser Stephen, D. Scott, Manimozhiyan Arumugam M. S 2003

Table B.3 VaR statistics (in %) for the 1st and 99th percentiles RGD = RiskMetrics-GED; RM = RiskMetrics; MX = Normal mixture

in unknown title
by unknown authors

Table 1 Micelle formation and partitioning of surfactants into POPC membranes at room temperature: Thermodynamic parameters

in Correlation of Membrane/Water Partition Coefficients of Detergents with the Critical Micelle Concentration
by H. Heerklotz, J. Seelig 2000
"... In PAGE 3: ...8 mM POPC vesi- cles). Within the accuracy specified in Table1 the data could be described by the same K and DH values as given above. A slightly different situation is encountered for n-decyl- b-D-maltopyranoside (C10-Malt).... In PAGE 4: ...5 was made and the binding con- stant for asymmetric distribution is thus by a factor of 1/a 5 2 larger than for symmetric distribution. The results of all detergent titrations are summarized in Table1 . The table also contains the CMC of the detergents as given in the literature.... In PAGE 5: ... 1) we thus predict Xb sat ( K z CMC as the limiting detergent-to-lipid ratio. In Table1 we have calcu- lated these hypothetical limits (penultimate column) and have compared them with the experimentally determined saturation limits, Xsatb (last column). For strong detergents the average K z CMC is 0.... In PAGE 5: ... The present correlation of K ; 1/CMC (within one order of magnitude) has been shown to hold true so far for POPC membranes. Since POPC is one of the most common natural lipids in mammalian cells, the binding constants summa- rized in Table1 can be considered as a guideline in esti- mating the detergent affinity also with respect to biological membranes. Nevertheless, the binding/partition constant of a detergent is definitely modulated by the actual membrane composition.... ..."

Table 1: BS6154 syntactic metalanguage

in Abstract Generic Base Standards
by R. S. Scowen

Table 3: Time consumption (in seconds) of the Minkowski-sum computation. DP | Dioctagonal Pyramid, ODP | Orthogonal Dioctagonal Pyramid, PH | Pentagonal Hexecontahedron, TI | Truncated Icosidodecahedron, GS4 | Geodesic Sphere level 4, RGD4 | Rotated Geodesic Sphere level 4, CH | the Convex Hull algorithm, CGMO | the Cubical Gaussian Map Overlay algorithm.

in Exact and efficient construction of Minkowski sums of convex polyhedra with applications
by Efi Fogel, Dan Halperin 2006
"... In PAGE 3: ... We are unaware of the existence of implementations of methods other than the method above to compute exact Minkowski sums. Our method exhibits much better performance than the na ve method in all cases, as demonstrated by the experiments listed in Table3 . Our methods well handles degenerate cases that require special treatment when alternative representations are used.... In PAGE 10: ... We compared the time it took to compute the exact Minkowski sum using both methods. The results listed in Table3 were produced by experiments conducted on a Pentium PC clocked at 1.8 GHz.... ..."
Cited by 11

TABLE 1. Sequencing primers and approximate locations in the 16S rRNA sequence of E. coli

in unknown title
by unknown authors 1995

Table 2. Comparison of HPD and ProDesign on the nirS and pmoA datasets.

in A fast and flexible approach to oligonucleotide probe design for genomes and gene families
by Shengzhong Feng , Elisabeth R.M. Tillier 2007
"... In PAGE 5: ... For HPD, we report the group-specific coverage for only those probes found at the top node of each cluster determined by HPD with an identity threshold, and the sequence-specific coverage, which counts the probes found at the terminal nodes. For ProDesign we report the coverage with and without clustering ( Table2 ). Although the different approaches lead to different clustering schemes, we obtained similar coverage of group-specific probes with both programs.... In PAGE 6: ...ielded a coverage of 93.3% to 94.2%% (see Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table2 for details). Another factor that affects coverage is the allowed range of melting temperatures.... ..."

Tables Table 1 - Characteristics of the core PIF/Harbinger-like elements of M. truncatula

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2007
Results 1 - 10 of 14,432