Tools
Sorted by:
Try your query at:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Results 31 - 40
of
16,952
Table 1. Summary of interesting statistics of the subject systems.
1996
"... In PAGE 6: ... Of these, BTOOL, EDGE, FIELD, GCC, and Ghostscript are available in the public domain; SGEN and the Unix include files are commercial products; and WPIS, a product of academic research, is available for a modest fee. Table1 summarizes some of the interesting statistics of our subject systems. We have assumed that all of the (relevant) #define directives for these systems are available in the include files, i.... In PAGE 8: ... WPIS is the only system for which none of the heuristics outperforms the File heuristic. Examination of the data in Table1 reveals the cause: an average of 1.14 candidate symbols per file.... ..."
Cited by 7
Table 7. Context of IS Positivist Case Research
"... In PAGE 15: ... Other key aspects are related to the moment data was collected in relation to the time the events occurred, whether there were one or more data collection periods, whether the researcher was able to gain sufficient access and spend enough time to develop an intimate understanding of the setting and the phenomenon of interest, and whether the researcher collected data during the course of the events (on-going) or a posteriori. As shown in Table7 , case researchers were not very explicit about the context surrounding their research. First, we found that while most case researchers (95 percent) described to some extent where their research was conducted (site description), only 32 percent stated the specific period of time (case period) under investigation.... ..."
Table 3: Recognition performance Further investigation on expanding the vocabulary size and improving the recognition results are still undergo- ing. But this pioneer work on automatic recognition of Cantonese serves as a milestone for future development in this interesting area. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This work is partly supported by research grants from the Croucher Foundation and the Hong Kong Research Grants Council.
1997
"... In PAGE 4: ... In our simulation experiments, it is observed that only a small number of training cycles are needed to complete step (3). Table3 shows the recognition performance of the proposed system. As the vocabulary being expanded, the top-1 recognition accuracy decreases signi cantly while the top-3 accuracy keeps at a fairly high level.... ..."
Cited by 4
Table 2. Responses to primary involvement question Primary Involvement in Industry N Software user - developed in-house 54 Software user - developed by a 3rd party 44 Software developer producing off-the-shelf systems 88 Software developer producing custom software systems 128 Research and Development Institute or University 10 Interest Group eg professional society or standards body 2
Table 1). For example, with the nine point integer scale the verbal statement strongly more important is connected with the weight ratio 5 whereas with the balanced scale the same ratio is 2.33. With both scales, however, the decision makers use this verbal statement equally often. There is a clear analogy between the use of words in preference elicitation and the use of words in probablility assessment (for a review see Budescu and Wallsten, 1995). The context dependency of the preferences is an interesting research question and the consequences and possible sources of biases in this area have not yet been thoroughly studied in connection with value trees (Goldstein, 1990; Tversky and Kahneman, 1992; Tversky and Simonson, 1993).
1998
"... In PAGE 9: ... Table1 : The percentages show how often each verbal expression was used with different evaluation scales... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 1: AIDA Q4. What are your main astronomical interests (up to three choices per respondent)? The number of responses and percentage for the category is given for each of students (18 responses), senior researchers (23 responses), and the total sample (41 responses).
2006
"... In PAGE 10: ... What are your main astronomical in- terests? Participants were able to select up to three research areas from a list, or provide their own choice. Table1 shows the results, with responses separated into student and senior groups. Q5.... ..."
Table 1: Non-classroom evidence of interest in open-ended exploration
"... In PAGE 4: ... We tracked the following as non-classroom evidence of interest in or success with open-ended exploration: participation in summer research projects, school-year non- course research projects, interest in graduate school, conference presentations, conference attendance, scholarly articles. Table1 summarizes the results as a comparison of 1994-2000 with 2001-2004. Figure 2: Results from three metrics on senior projects... ..."
Table 1: Researchers Affiliated with LEP ITR Project ROI/FOIa
"... In PAGE 5: ... 2.1 Personnel Directly Involved with LEP Table1 lists the primary researchers affiliated with LEP (see supplementary letters of collaboration or biographical sketches). This non-exhaustive list highlights unique and complementary interests of the research groups.... In PAGE 18: ... We believe strongly in unfettered exchange of software and data. Sub-groups of the immediately participating personnel ( Table1 ) will naturally form along dis- ciplinary and ROI boundaries. These sub-groups will communicate outside of any pre-planned mechanism, though within a medium (e.... ..."
Table 2. MIR Communities.
2003
"... In PAGE 2: ... MIR communities Understanding an interdisciplinary field requires under- standing the disciplines involved and the variety of research interests they represent. Table2 summarizes the research Table 1. Music Representations in MIR.... ..."
Cited by 2
Results 31 - 40
of
16,952
