Results 1  10
of
306,343
Semianalytic Tableaux For Propositional Modal Logics of Nonmonotonicity
, 1993
"... The propositional monotonic modal logics K45, K45D, S4:2, S4R and S4F elegantly capture the semantics of many current nonmonotonic formalisms as long as (strong) deducibility of A from a theory \Gamma; \Gamma ` A; allows the use of necessitation on the members of \Gamma: This is usually forbidden ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The propositional monotonic modal logics K45, K45D, S4:2, S4R and S4F elegantly capture the semantics of many current nonmonotonic formalisms as long as (strong) deducibility of A from a theory \Gamma; \Gamma ` A; allows the use of necessitation on the members of \Gamma: This is usually
Temporal and modal logic
 HANDBOOK OF THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE
, 1995
"... We give a comprehensive and unifying survey of the theoretical aspects of Temporal and modal logic. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1300 (17 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We give a comprehensive and unifying survey of the theoretical aspects of Temporal and modal logic.
Semianalytic Tableaux For Propositional Normal Modal Logics with Applications to Nonmonotonicity
, 1991
"... The propositional monotonic modal logics K45, K45D, S4:2, S4R and S4F elegantly capture the semantics of many current nonmonotonic formalisms as long as (strong) deducibility of A from a theory \Gamma; \Gamma ` A; allows the use of necessitation on the members of \Gamma: This is usually forbidden in ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The propositional monotonic modal logics K45, K45D, S4:2, S4R and S4F elegantly capture the semantics of many current nonmonotonic formalisms as long as (strong) deducibility of A from a theory \Gamma; \Gamma ` A; allows the use of necessitation on the members of \Gamma: This is usually forbidden
Abduction in Logic Programming
"... Abduction in Logic Programming started in the late 80s, early 90s, in an attempt to extend logic programming into a framework suitable for a variety of problems in Artificial Intelligence and other areas of Computer Science. This paper aims to chart out the main developments of the field over th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 616 (76 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abduction in Logic Programming started in the late 80s, early 90s, in an attempt to extend logic programming into a framework suitable for a variety of problems in Artificial Intelligence and other areas of Computer Science. This paper aims to chart out the main developments of the field over
Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Preferential Models and Cumulative Logics
, 1990
"... Many systems that exhibit nonmonotonic behavior have been described and studied already in the literature. The general notion of nonmonotonic reasoning, though, has almost always been described only negatively, by the property it does not enjoy, i.e. monotonicity. We study here general patterns of ..."
Abstract

Cited by 624 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Many systems that exhibit nonmonotonic behavior have been described and studied already in the literature. The general notion of nonmonotonic reasoning, though, has almost always been described only negatively, by the property it does not enjoy, i.e. monotonicity. We study here general patterns
Constraint Logic Programming: A Survey
"... Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) is a merger of two declarative paradigms: constraint solving and logic programming. Although a relatively new field, CLP has progressed in several quite different directions. In particular, the early fundamental concepts have been adapted to better serve in differe ..."
Abstract

Cited by 864 (25 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) is a merger of two declarative paradigms: constraint solving and logic programming. Although a relatively new field, CLP has progressed in several quite different directions. In particular, the early fundamental concepts have been adapted to better serve
A Framework for Defining Logics
 JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY
, 1993
"... The Edinburgh Logical Framework (LF) provides a means to define (or present) logics. It is based on a general treatment of syntax, rules, and proofs by means of a typed calculus with dependent types. Syntax is treated in a style similar to, but more general than, MartinLof's system of ariti ..."
Abstract

Cited by 807 (45 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The Edinburgh Logical Framework (LF) provides a means to define (or present) logics. It is based on a general treatment of syntax, rules, and proofs by means of a typed calculus with dependent types. Syntax is treated in a style similar to, but more general than, MartinLof's system
The Proposition Bank: An Annotated Corpus of Semantic Roles
 Computational Linguistics
, 2005
"... The Proposition Bank project takes a practical approach to semantic representation, adding a layer of predicateargument information, or semantic role labels, to the syntactic structures of the Penn Treebank. The resulting resource can be thought of as shallow, in that it does not represent corefere ..."
Abstract

Cited by 536 (21 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The Proposition Bank project takes a practical approach to semantic representation, adding a layer of predicateargument information, or semantic role labels, to the syntactic structures of the Penn Treebank. The resulting resource can be thought of as shallow, in that it does not represent
The Semantics Of Constraint Logic Programs
 JOURNAL OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING
, 1996
"... This paper presents for the first time the semantic foundations of CLP in a selfcontained and complete package. The main contributions are threefold. First, we extend the original conference paper by presenting definitions and basic semantic constructs from first principles, giving new and comp ..."
Abstract

Cited by 872 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper presents for the first time the semantic foundations of CLP in a selfcontained and complete package. The main contributions are threefold. First, we extend the original conference paper by presenting definitions and basic semantic constructs from first principles, giving new and complete proofs for the main lemmas. Importantly, we clarify which theorems depend on conditions such as solution compactness, satisfaction completeness and independence of constraints. Second, we generalize the original results to allow for incompleteness of the constraint solver. This is important since almost all CLP systems use an incomplete solver. Third, we give conditions on the (possibly incomplete) solver which ensure that the operational semantics is confluent, that is, has independence of literal scheduling.
Results 1  10
of
306,343