"... In PAGE 7: ... During this study, most stationary scans were obtained on either single-detector helical CT scanners or 4-MDCT scanners. Despite this, analysis of image quality showed that 10% of stationary scans had a major defect ( Table1 ). On initial analysis, this finding Fig.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ...2.3 Portable character set 306 307 A set of symbolic names for characters in Table1 , which is called the portable character 308 set, is used in character description text of this specification. The first eight entries in 309 Table 1 are defined in ISO/IEC 6429 and others are defined in ISO/IEC 10646-1.... In PAGE 9: ....2.3 Portable character set 306 307 A set of symbolic names for characters in Table 1, which is called the portable character 308 set, is used in character description text of this specification. The first eight entries in 309 Table1 are defined in ISO/IEC 6429 and others are defined in ISO/IEC 10646-1. 310 311 Table 1: Portable character set 312... In PAGE 17: ...he hexadecimal symbolic ellipsis ( quot;.. quot;) specification is only valid between symbolic 768 character names. The symbolic names shall consist of zero or more nonnumeric characters 769 from the set shown with visible glyphs in Table1 , followed by an integer formed by one 770 or more hexadecimal digits, using uppercase letters only for the range quot;A quot; to quot;F quot;. The 771 characters preceding the hexadecimal integer shall be identical in the two symbolic names, 772 and the integer formed by the hexadecimal digits in the second symbolic name shall be 773 identical to or greater than the integer formed by the hexadecimal digits in the first name.... In PAGE 17: ...he decimal symbolic ellipsis ( quot;.... quot;) specification is only valid between symbolic 782 character names. The symbolic names shall consist of zero or more nonnumeric characters 783 from the set shown with visible glyphs in Table1 , followed by an integer formed by one 784 or more decimal digits. The characters preceding the decimal integer shall be identical in 785 the two symbolic names, and the integer formed by the decimal digits in the second 786... In PAGE 64: ... The first value is 3539 the one used when generating an encoding, while the other values are accepted in 3540 decoding. Symbolic names may be included to identify values that can overlap with each 3541 other or with the values of the symbolic names shown in Table1 . It is possible to specify 3542 symbolic names for which no encoding exists in the encoded character set, by not 3543 specifying a value.... In PAGE 64: ... The difference between the 3547 second and the third syntax is the number of dots in the ellipsis: the second has 3 dots, the 3548 third has 4 dots. In these forms the symbolic names shall consist of zero or more 3549 nonnumeric characters from the set shown with visible glyphs in Table1 , followed by an 3550 integer formed by one or more decimal digits. The characters preceding the integer shall 3551 be identical in the two symbolic names, and the integer formed by the digits in the second 3552 symbolic name shall be identical to or greater than the integer formed by the digits in the 3553 first name.... In PAGE 64: ...ymbolic ellipses. The 3-dot symbolic decimal ellipses in charmaps is deprecated. 3565 3566 In the fourth syntax (symbolic hexadecimal ellipsis, with two dots), the line in the 3567 character set mapping defines a range of one or more symbolic names. In this form the 3568 symbolic names shall consist of zero or more nonnumeric characters from the set shown 3569 with visible glyphs in Table1 , followed by an integer formed by one or more hexadecimal 3570 digits, using uppercase letters only for the range quot;A quot; to quot;F quot;. The characters preceding the 3571 hexadecimal integer shall be identical in the two symbolic names, and the integer formed 3572 by the hexadecimal digits in the second symbolic name shall be identical to or greater than 3573 the integer formed by the hexadecimal digits in the first name.... In PAGE 108: ... 6806 6807 The charmap was introduced to resolve problems with the portability of, especially, 6808 FDCC-set sources. While the portable character set (in Table1 ) is a constant across all 6809 FDCC-sets for a particular application, this is not true for the extended character set. 6810 However, the particular coded character set used for an application does not necessarily 6811 imply different characteristics or collation: on the contrary, these attributes should in many 6812 cases be identical, regardless of codeset.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ...2.3 Portable character set 304 305 A set of symbolic names for characters in Table1 , which is called the portable character 306 set, is used in character description text of this specification. The first eight entries in 307 Table 1 are defined in ISO/IEC 6429 and others are defined in ISO/IEC 10646-1.... In PAGE 9: ....2.3 Portable character set 304 305 A set of symbolic names for characters in Table 1, which is called the portable character 306 set, is used in character description text of this specification. The first eight entries in 307 Table1 are defined in ISO/IEC 6429 and others are defined in ISO/IEC 10646-1. 308 309 Table 1: Portable character set 310... In PAGE 17: ...he hexadecimal symbolic ellipsis ( quot;.. quot;) specification is only valid between symbolic 768 character names. The symbolic names shall consist of zero or more nonnumeric characters 769 from the set shown with visible glyphs in Table1 , followed by an integer formed by one 770 or more hexadecimal digits, using uppercase letters only for the range quot;A quot; to quot;F quot;. The 771 characters preceding the hexadecimal integer shall be identical in the two symbolic names, 772 and the integer formed by the hexadecimal digits in the second symbolic name shall be 773 identical to or greater than the integer formed by the hexadecimal digits in the first name.... In PAGE 18: ...ISO/IEC PDTR 14652:1999(E) character names. The symbolic names shall consist of zero or more nonnumeric characters 783 from the set shown with visible glyphs in Table1 , followed by an integer formed by one 784 or more decimal digits. The characters preceding the decimal integer shall be identical in 785 the two symbolic names, and the integer formed by the decimal digits in the second 786 symbolic name shall be identical to or greater than the integer formed by the decimal 787 digits in the first name.... In PAGE 64: ... The first value is 3550 the one used when generating an encoding, while the other values are accepted in 3551 decoding. Symbolic names may be included to identify values that can overlap with each 3552 other or with the values of the symbolic names shown in Table1 . It is possible to specify 3553 symbolic names for which no encoding exists in the encoded character set, by not 3554 specifying a value.... In PAGE 64: ... The difference between the 3558 second and the third syntax is the number of dots in the ellipsis: the second has 3 dots, the 3559 third has 4 dots. In these forms the symbolic names shall consist of zero or more 3560 nonnumeric characters from the set shown with visible glyphs in Table1 , followed by an 3561 integer formed by one or more decimal digits. The characters preceding the integer shall 3562 be identical in the two symbolic names, and the integer formed by the digits in the second 3563 symbolic name shall be identical to or greater than the integer formed by the digits in the 3564... In PAGE 65: ...ymbolic ellipses. The 3-dot symbolic decimal ellipses in charmaps is deprecated. 3576 3577 In the fourth syntax (symbolic hexadecimal ellipsis, with two dots), the line in the 3578 character set mapping defines a range of one or more symbolic names. In this form the 3579 symbolic names shall consist of zero or more nonnumeric characters from the set shown 3580 with visible glyphs in Table1 , followed by an integer formed by one or more hexadecimal 3581 digits, using uppercase letters only for the range quot;A quot; to quot;F quot;. The characters preceding the 3582 hexadecimal integer shall be identical in the two symbolic names, and the integer formed 3583 by the hexadecimal digits in the second symbolic name shall be identical to or greater than 3584 the integer formed by the hexadecimal digits in the first name.... In PAGE 109: ... 6820 6821 The charmap was introduced to resolve problems with the portability of, especially, 6822 FDCC-set sources. While the portable character set (in Table1 ) is a constant across all 6823 FDCC-sets for a particular application, this is not true for the extended character set. 6824 However, the particular coded character set used for an application does not necessarily 6825 imply different characteristics or collation: on the contrary, these attributes should in many 6826 cases be identical, regardless of codeset.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ... Except for finding an appropriate solution or a typical pro- cedure for organisational, technical and cultural knowledge problems, the most im- portant independent indicator that has been stated by the respondents regarding a suc- cessful KM project is the sustainability of accomplished KM activities, followed by the indicators qualitative benefit, (strategic) knowledge goals, the organisational de- partment that is performing KM activities, the maturity level of an organisation that would like to implement KM, the organisational culture, as well as implementation time and amortisation time. 4 Development of the Reference Model As a result of the indicator identification and verification, we extracted a list of indi- cators as shown in Table4 + 5 (sorted by relevance). Based on these classified indicators, we developed an ontology-based reference model for the description and transferability of KM BPCs as sketched in Figure 1.... ..."

"... In PAGE 8: ...Portable microcomputer ( Table2 ): When the buyers were asked whether they received enough information via the Internet application to make a purchase decision, just over half (52%) said they did not. Additional information was wanted regarding technical specifications and warranties, as well as information on support and maintenance.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ... The problems are well known, they are chosen to be easily portable to several constraint programming systems (see Section 9). The main characteristics of the problems are listed in Table1 . Besides of portability and simplicity they cover a broad range with respect to the following criteria.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... 4.3: How is the portable office used? Data on how the portable office is used is summarized in Table2 . The results indicate that most individuals use their portable technology to perform a variety of tasks (respondents use an average of 3.... ..."

"... In PAGE 20: ... This has led to the technology being investigated in recent years as a soldier portable power source in order to take advantage of the ready availability and high energy density of diesel and kerosene fuels. Table3 describes the goals of current key SOFC development projects. It should be noted that a majority of portable SOFC prototypes that have been developed utilize natural gas or propane as the fuel stock.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ... Flash programming rates may not be able to keep up with the peak write thruput of the heavy workload trace, but DRAM bu#0Bering can be used to rate match the two. 9 Big Picture The results of this paper can be put into perspectiveby examining the characteristics of the three memory types in future portable computers #28see Table3 #29. All three memories are necessary to construct a lowpower #0Cle sys- tem.... ..."