Results 1 - 10
of
12,535
Table 7. Accuracy on the Pima set using Polynomial classifier.
2000
"... In PAGE 7: ... Polynomial clas- sifier retained the same ranking orders between projection methods, and it appears to excel with low-dimensional fea- ture fectors. This is most pronounced in the results with the Pima set ( Table7 ), where only one feature produces high- est accuracies. However, LVQ excels in higher dimensions... ..."
Cited by 38
Table 7. Accuracy on the Pima set using Polynomial classifier.
2000
"... In PAGE 7: ... Polynomial clas- sifier retained the same ranking orders between projection methods, and it appears to excel with low-dimensional fea- ture fectors. This is most pronounced in the results with the Pima set ( Table7 ), where only one feature produces high- est accuracies. However, LVQ excels in higher dimensions... ..."
Cited by 38
TABLE VII POLYNOMIAL CLASSIFIER PERFORMANCE USING PCA FEATURES
2005
Cited by 1
Table 3: Speaker verification results on the YOHO database using polynomial classifiers. Polynomial EER EER Number of
2000
"... In PAGE 9: ...peakers yields an average EER of 0.13% on the seen imposters and 0.32% on the unseen imposters for the 10th order normalised polynomial kernel. To put these figures into perspective the results obtained by the polynomial clas- sifiers method is shown in Table3 (which includes results of further experiments not in [3]). It can be seen that the performance of SVMs is close to but not quite as good as the polynomial classifiers technique.... ..."
Cited by 19
Table 7: Performance of the SVM post-classifier using polynomial kernel, p = 1
Table 9: Performance of the SVM post-classifier using polynomial kernel, p = 3
Table 7: Performance of the SVM post-classifier using polynomial kernel, p = 1
Table 8: Performance of the SVM post-classifier using polynomial kernel, p = 2
Results 1 - 10
of
12,535