Results 11 - 20
of
5,522
Table 5. Strengths and weaknesses of GIS and remotely sensed spatial data.
2006
TABLE I. Status of automation in photogrammetry.
1998
Cited by 3
Table 1. Hazards and General Associated Utility of Remotely Sensed Data. (Adapted from Wadge, 1993, p. 10)
in Published by
1999
"... In PAGE 5: ...TABLE OF CONTENTS The James and Marilyn Lovell Center for Environmental Geography and Hazards Research i Center Scholars and Research Interests ii Introduction 1 Description of Material Found in the Bibliography 1 An Invitation to Authors 2 The Use of Remote Sensing in Detecting and Analyzing Natural Hazards and Disasters, 1972-1998: A Partially Annotated Bibliography 6 List of Tables Table1 . Hazards and General Associated Utility of Remotely Sensed Data 3 Table 2.... In PAGE 6: ... Additionally, because of the sometimes bewildering number of acronyms commonly used in remote sensing, Appendix B provides a glossary of acronyms found in some of the references and pertinent to the field. To further assist scholars and environmental managers, Table1 provides a general overview of different types of hazards addressed, sensors used to study them, types of data the sensors ... ..."
Table 3. Approaches to using multiple features of remotely sensed data for improving classification accuracy.
"... In PAGE 18: ... As high spatial resolution data become readily available, textural and contextual information become significant in image classification. Table3 summarizes major research efforts for improving classification accuracy by using different characteristics of remote-sensing data. 5.... ..."
Table 2: Listing image data sets collected for the Moreton Bay remote sensing task.
2004
"... In PAGE 33: ...Moreton Bay Remote Sensing Tasks 31 Definition Table2 . Description and definition of the apparent optical properties.... In PAGE 34: ... The set of instruments listed in Table 1 augmented with the AC-9 were deployed during the February 2003 field trip to measure SIOPs at the validation site and closer to the mouths of the Mooloolah and Maroochy Rivers. The image data sets collected during these field sampling runs, along with additional Landsat and airborne data sets collected for the project are listed in Table2 below. 4.... ..."
Table 6. Remote sensing data used in multi-level classification. Level System Image scale
Table 2 Results of correlating the various remote sensing features with measured cover for the test stands
"... In PAGE 6: ... However, the inclusion of all features is straightforward and allows at least some general comparison to be made. Table2 gives the results as the linear correlation of each feature with the covers measured on the ground. Looking first at the results for the 31/8 image (Table 2), it can be seen that there was no correlation with cover for any of the three TM bands.... In PAGE 6: ... Table 2 gives the results as the linear correlation of each feature with the covers measured on the ground. Looking first at the results for the 31/8 image ( Table2 ), it can be seen that there was no correlation with cover for any of the three TM bands. Neither did either spectral index have any correlation with cover.... In PAGE 6: ... Although, in principal, model inversion could help take into account nonlinear relations between reflectance and forest cover, there was no evidence of any improved result over the empirical features in this case. For the 20/5 image ( Table2 ), it can be seen that the respective correlation coefficients between TM bands and cover were stronger for all three bands, although correla- Fig.... In PAGE 8: ...26. In addition, this was a better result than when TM Bands 3, 4, and 5 from both dates were used to invert the model ( Table2 ), and this may result from relatively low correlations in TM4, which was dropped in the inversion. 6.... In PAGE 9: ... This supports Fig. 5b, where there was better correlation using the 20/5 imagery ( Table2 ). It is worth noting that, because of the potential for confusion between low and high covers, the empirically derived results may have been artificially strengthened relative to the inversion results because the test stands were predominately high covers.... In PAGE 9: ... 7b shows that TM5 reflectance appears to have quite a similar dynamic range at high covers for both dates. However, Table2 shows that no correlation existed between TM5 and cover for 31/8, indicating that Fig.... ..."
Table 5: Some selected features of optical remote sensing and their counterparts in SAR interferometry optical R.S. INSAR
Table 1. Space missions for solar and heliospheric obser- vationsin-situ Remote sensing Start End
"... In PAGE 4: ... 4. THE NEW MISSIONS The present constellation of solar and heliospheric observatories includes those listed in Table1 (see the WWW entry points listed in Table 2 for fuller infor- mation). The approved projects (TRACE, SOLAR- B, and HESSI) and some likely future missions are shown in separate elds; the latter include truly ex- ploratory missions such as STEREO and Solar Probe, which introduce stereoscopic and close-in solar obser- vations respectively.... ..."
Results 11 - 20
of
5,522