"... In PAGE 4: ...facilitates the interviewing process by allowing respondents to report names of household members all at once and in a more natural way where the first, middle and last name and other volunteered information such as the person=s relationship to the respondent are collected and listed on one line of a roster matrix, and such information for the entire household is listed on one computer screen (See Table1 ). Note that both the MP control and test instruments first gather an initial roster, and then try to supplement it and make it more complete through some additional roster probes.... In PAGE 4: ... Note that both the MP control and test instruments first gather an initial roster, and then try to supplement it and make it more complete through some additional roster probes. [Insert Table1 here] Roster Probes. After completing the initial roster, we administer roster probes primarily directed at identifying persons with marginal or tenuous attachment to the household.... ..."

"... In PAGE 12: ...ap between the lower bound and the heuristic solution value is 0.9%. The rostering optimization algorithm described in Section 5 was tested on real-life instances provided by FS, involving up to about 900 pairings. The results obtained are illustrated in Table2 . For each instance we report the instance name, the number of pairings, the best simple lower bound, the Lagrangian lower bound, the heuristic solution value, and the corresponding computing time, expressed in PC Pentium 90 CPU seconds.... ..."

"... In PAGE 18: ...The previously described lower and upper bounding procedures were tested on real-world instances provided by the Italian railway company within the competition FARO, aimed at developing e ective heuristics for crew rostering. The results obtained are illustrated in Table2 . For each instance we report the instance name, the number of duties, the best simple lower bound (as introduced at the beginning of subsection 4.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ...able 18. Cabin environment within lunar lander ........................................................................ 61 Table19 .... In PAGE 30: ... Based on the operational conditions of the International Space Station, the following conditions will be maintained onboard the lander ( Table 18). Assuming an average metabolic rate of 2677 calories/person/day, Table19 lists crew necessities and corresponding outputs. The basal metabolic rate was calculated from the calorie requirement for an average adult American man weighing 79 kg that sleeps 8 hours a day and spends the remaining 16 hours sitting.... ..."

"... In PAGE 17: ... All test-runs were performed on a Pentium II class machine running at 300MHz with 128MB of memory. Table1 shows the applicability of our proposed SWIFTROSTER algorithm to a subset of problem instances for the airline described above referring to the schedule-month May 1998. The problem sizes of the crew rostering range from small long-haul instances with only 14 pilots and 64 pairings up to large cabin-crew problems with up to 779 crew members and 1711 pairings.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... Results Impact of New Roster Procedures and Probes. Together, the new roster and probes seem to mostly generate a comparable household roster where the average household size of the MP Test instrument does not differ significantly from the Control instrument (see Table2 ). Although there is no clear evidence that the new MP roster procedures and probes did better than the SIPP 2001 Panel instrument, it is important to note that the new roster procedures have no negative impact on our data quality.... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ... Common changes to the roster question included omission of t he reference date and th e phrase quot;staying here. quot; A portion of this is probably due to the high respondent break-in rate (27% Table1... In PAGE 7: ...Interview ers frequently paraphrased the listing order instruction (29% Table1 A) b y s hortening it or routinely omitting the last sentence. In close to 20% of the interviews, the instruction was omitted altogether (Table 1A).... In PAGE 7: ... In close to 20% of the interviews, the instruction was omitted altogether (Table 1A). Th ese interviewer behaviors may have contributed toward some of the inadequat e respondent ans wers at NAMEB (see Table1 B) such as quot;it apos;s just me and my little boy quot; . Su ch answers do not meet the objectives of the question (a list of names ).... In PAGE 7: ... Othe r i nadequ ate responses such as quot;I own my own home quot; resulted from the order instruction, which sidetracked respondents from their listing task. In close to one-quarter of the cases, interviewers modified the introduction to the roste r probes (INTRO ) so that the meaning was changed ( Table1 A). Most times it wa s paraphrased into something like quot;I have a few questions to make sure you didn apos;t forge t anybody, quot; but some interviewers seemed to be warning the respondent of the probes to f ollow by making statements like quot;I know that this sounds redundant bu t they ask me to ask these questions .... ..."