• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 6,590
Next 10 →

Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications

by Mike Uschold, Michael Gruninger - KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW , 1996
"... This paper is intended to serve as a comprehensive introduction to the emerging field concerned with the design and use of ontologies. We observe that disparate backgrounds, languages, tools, and techniques are a major barrier to effective communication among people, organisations, and/or software s ..."
Abstract - Cited by 582 (3 self) - Add to MetaCart
This paper is intended to serve as a comprehensive introduction to the emerging field concerned with the design and use of ontologies. We observe that disparate backgrounds, languages, tools, and techniques are a major barrier to effective communication among people, organisations, and/or software

From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language

by Ian Horrocks, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Frank Van Harmelen - Journal of Web Semantics , 2003
"... The OWL Web Ontology Language is a new formal language for representing ontologies in the Semantic Web. OWL has features from several families of representation languages, including primarily Description Logics and frames. OWL also shares many characteristics with RDF, the W3C base of the Semantic W ..."
Abstract - Cited by 615 (39 self) - Add to MetaCart
The OWL Web Ontology Language is a new formal language for representing ontologies in the Semantic Web. OWL has features from several families of representation languages, including primarily Description Logics and frames. OWL also shares many characteristics with RDF, the W3C base of the Semantic

Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology

by Natalya F. Noy, Deborah L. Mcguinness , 2001
"... In recent years the development of ontologies—explicit formal specifications of the terms in the domain and relations among them (Gruber 1993)—has been moving from the realm of Artificial-Intelligence laboratories to the desktops of domain experts. Ontologies have become common on the World-Wide Web ..."
Abstract - Cited by 830 (5 self) - Add to MetaCart
-Wide Web. The ontologies on the Web range from large taxonomies categorizing Web sites (such as on Yahoo!) to categorizations of products for sale and their features (such as on Amazon.com). The WWW Consortium (W3C) is developing the Resource Description Framework (Brickley and Guha 1999), a language

Towards a Standard Upper Ontology

by Ian Niles, Adam Pease , 2001
"... The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) is an upper level ontology that has been proposed as a starter document for The Standard Upper Ontology Working Group, an IEEE-sanctioned working group of collaborators from the fields of engineering, philosophy, and information science. The SUMO provides d ..."
Abstract - Cited by 589 (22 self) - Add to MetaCart
and the relations between them. Categories & Descriptors --- I.2.4 [Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods]: Artificial Intelligence -- representations (procedural and rule-based), semantic networks. General Terms --- Documentation, Languages, Standard-ization, Theory. Keywords --- Ontologies

A translation approach to portable ontology specifications

by Thomas R. Gruber - KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION , 1993
"... To support the sharing and reuse of formally represented knowledge among AI systems, it is useful to define the common vocabulary in which shared knowledge is represented. A specification of a representational vocabulary for a shared domain of discourse — definitions of classes, relations, functions ..."
Abstract - Cited by 3365 (9 self) - Add to MetaCart
, including frame-based systems as well as relational languages. This allows researchers to share and reuse ontologies, while retaining the computational benefits of specialized implementations. We discuss how the translation approach to portability addresses several technical problems. One problem is how

OilEd: a Reason-able Ontology Editor for the Semantic Web

by Sean Bechhofer, Ian Horrocks, Carole Goble, Robert Stevens - Proceedings of KI2001, Joint German/Austrian conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2001
"... Ontologies will play a pivotal r61e in the "Semantic Web", where they will provide a source of precisely defined terms that can be communicated across people and applications. OilEd, is an ontology editor that has an easy to use fi'ame interface, yet at the same time allows users ..."
Abstract - Cited by 241 (31 self) - Add to MetaCart
to exploit the full power of an expressive web ontology language (OIL). OilEd uses reasoning to support ontology design, facilitating the development of ontologies that are both more detailed and more accurate.

Description Logic Programs: Combining Logic Programs with Description Logic

by Benjamin N. Grosof, Ian Horrocks , 2002
"... We show how to interoperate, semantically and inferentially, between the leading Semantic Web approaches to rules (RuleML Logic Programs) and ontologies (OWL/DAML+OIL Description Logic) via analyzing their expressive intersection. To do so, we define a new intermediate knowledge representation (KR) ..."
Abstract - Cited by 529 (46 self) - Add to MetaCart
We show how to interoperate, semantically and inferentially, between the leading Semantic Web approaches to rules (RuleML Logic Programs) and ontologies (OWL/DAML+OIL Description Logic) via analyzing their expressive intersection. To do so, we define a new intermediate knowledge representation (KR

Tractable reasoning and efficient query answering in description logics: The DL-Lite family

by Diego Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, Domenico Lembo, Maurizio Lenzerini, Riccardo Rosati - J. OF AUTOMATED REASONING , 2007
"... We propose a new family of Description Logics (DLs), called DL-Lite, specifically tailored to capture basic ontology languages, while keeping low complexity of reasoning. Reasoning here means not only computing subsumption between concepts, and checking satisfiability of the whole knowledge base, b ..."
Abstract - Cited by 497 (123 self) - Add to MetaCart
We propose a new family of Description Logics (DLs), called DL-Lite, specifically tailored to capture basic ontology languages, while keeping low complexity of reasoning. Reasoning here means not only computing subsumption between concepts, and checking satisfiability of the whole knowledge base

Simulation, verification, automated composition of web services

by Srini Narayanan, Sheila A. Mcilraith - In WWW , 2002
"... Web services-- Web-accessible programs and devices – are a key application area for the Semantic Web. With the proliferation of Web services and the evolution towards the Semantic Web comes the opportunity to automate various Web services tasks. Our objective is to enable markup and automated reason ..."
Abstract - Cited by 391 (7 self) - Add to MetaCart
reasoning technology to describe, simulate, compose, test, and verify compositions of Web services. We take as our starting point the DAML-S DAML+OIL ontology for describing the capabilities of Web services. We define the semantics for a relevant subset of DAML-S in terms of a first-order logical language

OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web

by Dieter Fensel, Frank Van Harmelen, Ian Horrocks, Deborah L. Mcguinness - IEEE Intelligent Systems , 2001
"... Researchers in artificial intelligence first developed ontologies to facilitate knowledge sharing and reuse. Since the beginning of the 1990s, ontologies have become a popular research topic, and several AI research communities—including Ontologies play a major role in supporting information exchang ..."
Abstract - Cited by 268 (32 self) - Add to MetaCart
exchange across various networks. A prerequisite for such a role is the development of a joint standard for specifying and exchanging ontologies. The authors present OIL, a proposal for
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 6,590
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University