### Table 7: Percentages of typed digits and non-numerical answers.

2000

Cited by 2

### Table 1. Examples of non-numeric belief, plausibility and probability functions induced by compatibility relations. A

"... In PAGE 16: ... Let W = fw1; w2; w3; w4g and = f 1; 2; 3g. Consider the following compatibility relations: 1(w1) = f 1; 2g; 1(w2) = f 2; 3g; 1(w3) = f 3g; 1(w4) = f 1; 3g; 2(w1) = f 1g; 2(w2) = f 2g; 2(w3) = f 3g; 2(w4) = f 3g; 3(w1) = f 1g; 3(w2) = f 1g; 3(w3) = f 1; 2g; 3(w4) = f 1; 2; 3g: The induced non-numeric functions for 1 and 2 are summarized in Table1 . Note that i1 and i1 de ne a pair of non-numeric belief and plausibility functions, while i2 = i2 = i2 de nes a non-numeric probability function.... ..."

### Table 2. Table 2. An example of non-numeric necessity and possibility functions induced by a compatibility relation. A

### Table 5.1 Nonnumerical overhead for grid graphs. k 3 4 5 6 7 8

### Table 10.1: Non-numerical attributes from the Cleveland data set.

### Table 10.1: Non-numerical attributes from the Cleveland data set.

### Table 1. Comparison of results between grids with and without diagonals. New results

1994

"... In PAGE 2: ... For two-dimensional n n meshes without diagonals 1-1 problems have been studied for more than twenty years. The so far fastest solutions for 1-1 problems and for h-h problems with small h 9 are summarized in Table1 . In that table we also present our new results on grids with diagonals and compare them with those for grids without diagonals.... ..."

Cited by 11

### Table 9: Comparison of speedups for different environments. The speedups of the non-numerical applications corre- spond to the average of the runs for the two input sets that are not used for profiling.

2001

"... In PAGE 11: ... The best strategy for non-overlapped execution in both types of applications is AdvCoarseR, which is applied with retraction when applicable. To summarize our results, Table9 compares the speedups for different environments. Relative to P.... In PAGE 11: ...ave P.host affinity. In this case, our strategies cannot help. To put our results in perspective, Table9 shows the speedups un- der two related scenarios. The first one is an ideal system with 2 P.... In PAGE 11: ... We ran the numerical and non-numerical applications on such a machine after the Polaris and the Silicon Graphics paralleliz- ing compilers, respectively, had marked the parallel sections. The speedups on such a machine are shown in Table9 . Clearly, the re- sults are not directly comparable to our simulation results because of differences in architecture.... ..."

Cited by 15

### Table 9: Comparison of speedups for different environments. The speedups of the non-numerical applications corre- spond to the average of the runs for the two input sets that are not used for profiling.

2001

"... In PAGE 11: ... The best non-overlapped execution strategy in both types of applications is AdvCoarseR, which is applied with retraction when applicable. To summarize our results, Table9 compares the speedups for different environments. Relative to P.... In PAGE 11: ...ave P.host affinity. In this case, our strategies cannot help. To put our results in perspective, Table9 shows the speedups un- der two related scenarios. The first one is an ideal system with 2 P.... In PAGE 11: ... We ran the numerical and non-numerical applications on such a machine after the Polaris and the Silicon Graphics paralleliz- ing compilers, respectively, had marked the parallel sections. The speedups on such a machine are shown in Table9 . Clearly, the re- sults are not directly comparable to our simulation results because of differences in architecture.... ..."

Cited by 15

### Table 9: Comparison of speedups for different environments. The speedups of the non-numerical applications corre- spond to the average of the runs for the two input sets that are not used for profiling.

"... In PAGE 11: ... The best non-overlapped execution strategy in both types of applications is AdvCoarseR, which is applied with retraction when applicable. To summarize our results, Table9 compares the speedups for different environments. Relative to P.... In PAGE 11: ...ave P.host affinity. In this case, our strategies cannot help. To put our results in perspective, Table9 shows the speedups un- der two related scenarios. The first one is an ideal system with 2 P.... In PAGE 11: ... We ran the numerical and non-numerical applications on such a machine after the Polaris and the Silicon Graphics paralleliz- ing compilers, respectively, had marked the parallel sections. The speedups on such a machine are shown in Table9 . Clearly, the re- sults are not directly comparable to our simulation results because of differences in architecture.... ..."