### Table 7: Non-uniform Input

1998

"... In PAGE 9: ...93 0.9506 66990 Table 6: Di#0Berent Symbol Ratios InputClass = Uniform, m =2;n= 1000;k =2;p=#28Ratio; 1 , Ratio#29 Table7 shows selected experiments with input generated from non-uniform probability distributions The probability distribution of each0; 1-input string is described by a linear functions de#0Cned over its length. For simpli#0Ccation, this function is de#0Cned by the line connecting the probabilityvalues of the leftmost string symbol p l and the rightmost string symbol p r .... ..."

Cited by 1

### Table 1. Comparison between Two-Stage and Three-Stage Linear Decompressors for Non-Uniform Specified Bit Distributions

"... In PAGE 6: ... Experimental Results To see how the encoding efficiency for the proposed 3-stage scheme varies with respect to different distributions of specified bits and different scan architectures, the first set of experiments was performed on randomly generated test cubes. The results are shown in Table1 . The number of channels from the tester, b, was 16.... ..."

### Table2. Computational results of non-uniform traffic demand

1996

"... In PAGE 6: ...he second system tested has a non-uniform demand. It has 12 nodes and its reception capacity is 3. We generate 20 different traffic demands in the range of 2 - 6. Table2 is the computational results of our ... ..."

### Table 1: Voltage drop results. The % non-uniformity is the percentage of the original grid nodes that were removed so as to create a non-uniform grid.

2003

"... In PAGE 4: ... The number of Vdd (C4) sites and leakage current sources are supplied by the user; the C4s are then distributed at random over the grid nodes. Table1 shows the characteristics of a number of test grids, along with the statistics of the worst case voltage drop for each, as a percentage of Vdd. In all the runs, the voltage thresholds at all the nodes were specified to be artificially large so as not to create any violations.... ..."

Cited by 6

### Table 1: Voltage drop results. The % non-uniformity is the percentage of the original grid nodes that were removed so as to create a non-uniform grid.

2003

"... In PAGE 4: ... The number of Vdd (C4) sites and leakage current sources are supplied by the user; the C4s are then distributed at random over the grid nodes. Table1 shows the characteristics of a number of test grids, along with the statistics of the worst case voltage drop for each, as a percentage of Vdd. In all the runs, the voltage thresholds at all the nodes were specified to be artificially large so as not to create any violations.... ..."

Cited by 6

### Table 2: Performance of the stochastic branch and bound method on a problem with 10 projects and 1000 non-uniformly distributed scenarios. At Pass 0 exact bounds were calculated. At Passes 1{10 random bounds based on 10 observations were used. \Nodes quot; denotes the number of subsets generated. \Time quot; is the CPU time in seconds on a SUN Sparcstation 2, including the time of the nal objective estimation. \Objective quot; is the true objective value at the solution.

"... In PAGE 31: ... Ten such passes (regenerative cycles) of the stochastic method were made, with di erent seeds for the random number generator used to sample the scenarios. The results are shown in Table2 . Additionally, in Figure 2 we illustrate the progress of the deterministic method and the stochastic method in Pass 9 (note the non-monotonicity of the bounds).... ..."

### Table V. Coe cient of variation of stretches for non-uniformly distributed redundant requests, relative to the scheme using no redundant requests, averaged over 50 experiments, for N = 10 clusters.

Cited by 1

### Table 8.1. Comparison between Two-Stage and Three-Stage Linear Decompressors for Non-Uniform Specified Bit Distributions Random Test Cubes Scan Architecture Linear

2004

### Table 2. The distribution of the data in non-uniformly

1992

"... In PAGE 22: ... Table2 shows the distribution of the data in the non-uniformly distributed #0Cles among 3 disks. Number of Data Distribution on Disks Records Number of Blocks Number of Blocks Number of Blocks in Files on Disk 1 on Disk 2 on Disk 3 1000 14 13 14 10000 138 138 137 15000 209 210 208 20000 279 279 279 Table 1.... In PAGE 22: ... Table 1 shows that the data in the uniformly distributed #0Cles is evenly distributed among disks. Table2 shows that the data in the non-uniformly distributed #0Cles is nearly equally distributed among disks even without using any rebalancing algorithm. Performance of range query processing.... ..."

Cited by 38