• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 631
Next 10 →

Table 2: Performance data for non-differentiable problems

in Interval extensions of non-smooth functions for global optimization and nonlinear systems solvers
by R. Baker Kearfott 1996
"... In PAGE 12: ... Floating point evaluations for the approximate optimizer or root-finder are not represented; such additional statistics are available upon request from the author. Performance results appear in Table2 . In each case in the optimization code, the exhaustive search was successful, and the final list consisted of a single box containing the unique global optimizer.... ..."
Cited by 5

Table 5: Factors in non-differentiating software and their impact on collaboration and competitiveness.

in Open Source Software and Impact on
by Erkko Anttila, Erkko Anttila 2006

Table 2 Sizes of non-differentiable sets of variables

in Boolean Matching Using Generalized Reed-Muller Forms
by Chien-Chung Tsai , Malgorzata Marek-Sadowska
"... In PAGE 14: ... For the benchmarks with hard output functions, we have also investigated all variables for the purpose of logic verification. Table2 , column #hi, shows the sizes of each subset of variables that are not differentiated in any output function. Multiple subsets of the same size are shown with the number of sets outside the parentheses.... ..."

Table II. Non-differentiable problems. Lipschitz constants and global solutions.

in Test Problems for Lipschitz Univariate Global Optimization with Multiextremal Constraints
by Domenico Famularo, Yaroslav D. Sergeyev, Paolo Pugliese

Table 1. % multiple patterns that are non-differentiable because of history aliasing for CFP2000

in Path-based reuse distance analysis
by Changpeng Fang, Steve Carr, Soner Önder, Zhenlin Wang
Cited by 1

Table 1. % multiple patterns that are non-differentiable because of history aliasing for CFP2000

in Z.: Path-based reuse distance analysis
by Changpeng Fang, Steve Carr, Soner Önder, Zhenlin Wang
Cited by 1

Table 2. % multiple patterns that are non-differentiable because of history aliasing for CINT2000

in Z.: Path-based reuse distance analysis
by Changpeng Fang, Steve Carr, Soner Önder, Zhenlin Wang
Cited by 1

Table IV. Non-Differentiable problems. Numerical results obtained by the method of Pijavskii working with the penalty function (4).

in Test Problems for Lipschitz Univariate Global Optimization with Multiextremal Constraints
by Domenico Famularo, Yaroslav D. Sergeyev, Paolo Pugliese

Table 4: Simulated crude prevalence odds ratios for fibromyalgia according to hypothesized levels of observed non-differential sensitivity and specificity of outcome misclassification

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2006
"... In PAGE 5: ...0 for migraine would have been observed if the prevalence of the con- founder was 80% in the IBS cohort, and the odds ratio between the confounder and migraine was 8. Table4 shows simulated crude prevalence odds ratios for fibromyalgia according to the hypothesized levels of non- differential sensitivity and specificity of outcome detec- tion. The analysis indicated that imperfect sensitivity or specificity of fibromyalgia detection would have biased the observed prevalence odds ratio towards the null.... ..."

Table 9: Spatial correlated RMS error summaries for LAAS without differential corrections. Non-differentiated LAAS Spatial Correlated error summaries Activity Profile Points X (m) Y (m) Height (m)

in NASA/TM-2004-213506 Positioning System Accuracy Assessment for the Runway Incursion Prevention System Flight Test at the Dallas/Ft. Worth International Airport
by Cuong C. Quach 2004
"... In PAGE 22: ...owered on. For that day, LAAS operated entirely in non-differential mode. Two runs on the forth day (flight R173) also indicated non-differential LAAS operations. The RMS error summaries are shown in Table 8 for LAAS data and Table9 for non-differentially corrected LAAS data. There does not seem to be a significant difference between LAAS operating in differential or non-differential mode.... In PAGE 35: ...he average degrades only very slightly to range from .54 to 1.368 meters horizontal and 2.867 to 8.034 meters vertical ( Table9 ). This insignificant difference between the LAAS versus non-differentiated LAAS is a bit surprising but is substantiated by visual inspection of the ground tracks.... ..."
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 631
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University