"... In PAGE 6: ... Finally, in a hierarchy interaction lines are well defined and the facilitation level assumes the function of global control of the society and co-ordination of interaction with the outside world. Table1 gives an overview of the characteristics of different agent societies. The characteristics and requisites for each role determine the required capabilities ... ..."

"... In PAGE 10: ... Another survey with a different pair of words provides broadly similar conclusions. In Table5 , the uses of society in the WCWNZE are broken down into... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ... SCJ has established the criteria for the accreditation based on the number of society members, regularity of its publications, composition of its officials, etc. Table1 is derived by counting descriptions in Directory of Academic Societies 2002-03 (Gakkai Meikan) compiled by a SCJ related foundation (JAPAN SCIENCE SUPPORT FOUNDATION, 2001). Because some of the descriptions on publications for societies in literature and law are missing, we can assume more publications than those in the table.... In PAGE 3: ... However ISI apos;s indexes include limited number of world prominent journals mainly in English language, and incorporate few journals of Japanese academic societies. As is assumed with Table1 , we have a large number of scholarly papers which are written in Japanese language, many of them being published on Japanese society journals. For those papers there had not been any mean to trace citation chains, and a citation index type database for them would be expected to help their utilization... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... The remainder were found by the author. Preliminary to the bibliography, in Table1 , is a list of the 186 societies in the Standard Sample, showing (1) the SCCS number, (2) the societal name, (3) the pinpo inted date, (4) the sequential number in the Ethnographic Atlas, (4) the Ethnographic Atlas regional identity code, (5) the HRAF Outline of World Cultures (Murdock 1975) code, (6) the quality of the HRAF file, a=good, b=useful, c=inadequate, and (7) the p inpointed focus. The societies are listed by order of appearance in the Standard Sample.... In PAGE 5: ...4 The bibliography is presented in the same order as the societies are listed in Table1 . Each set of bibliographic entri es for a society is headed by (1) the SCCS number (Murdock and White 1969), (2) sequential EA number (Murdock 1967), (3) regional EA identity code (Murdock 1967), (4) societal name, (5) pinpointed focus; and, on the second line, (6) G: the geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude) of the pinpointed group, and (7) T: pinpointed time.... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ... The United States receives more refugees than all other countries put together (Martin, Larkin amp; Nathanson, 2000). In Table1... In PAGE 4: ... As to religious cosmology, people in traditional societies submit to and depend on the direction of a supreme entity in their daily lives, whereas indi- viduals in modern counterparts tend to place more importance on science and rationality. In contrasting primary values, it can be observed in Table1 that in developing countries, sentiment and tradition take precedence over rationality and efficiency. Residential settings of people in poor nations are generally rural, whereas in the United States, for example, most people live in urban areas.... In PAGE 4: ... Easy access to communication and transportation enables people to contact friends and associates any time anywhere. Also, listed in Table1 is literacy. In traditional societies, educational opportunities are not available to children as they are in the United States, France, England, Canada, and other Western countries, where the state requires parents to educate their children.... In PAGE 5: ... It is easy to comprehend why cultures collide when people migrate from traditional to modern societies. It should be pointed out that the contrasts shown in Table1 are general. Individuals from various parts of the world dream of becoming French, English, American, or a citizen of some other country in the developed world.... ..."

"... In PAGE 19: ... (1995) was to make their simplifications explicit and to discuss how they might affect the results. Gains to participants, measured as changes in total earnings in a period of 31-33 months, were $1,000 in 1990 dollars in Washington and $15,000 in Massachusetts ( Table7 ). Benus et... In PAGE 20: ... Community economic development (Servon 1998) was also assumed null. In Washington, a time-and-motion study valued government costs for administrative inputs at $400 per treatment ( Table7 ). In Massachusetts, the contractors who ran the program cost $1,000 per treatment.... In PAGE 20: ... An evaluation of a similar British program assumed that each two new firms in the program would displace one existing firm (Bendick and Egan 1987). Total UI transfers from government to participants were $1,000 per participant in Washington and $900 in Massachusetts ( Table7 ). These transfers were offset in part by taxes paid by participants to government, $200 in Washington and $2,000 in Massachusetts.... In PAGE 21: ...In Massachusetts, total benefits net of costs were $12,000 for treatments, $2,000 for government, and $14,000 for society ( Table7 ).... In PAGE 21: ...or government, and $14,000 for society (Table 7). Benus et al. (1995 p. 194) conclude that UISED in Massachusetts was a highly cost-effective policy tool for assisting UI claimants who are interested in pursuing self-employment. In Washington, total benefits net of costs were $2,000 for treatments, $1,200 for government, and $700 for society ( Table7 ). Benus et al.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ...Table1 summarizes the three perspectives on the relationship between the Internet and society. Methods Review Existing research employs various methods to examine the relationship between Internet use and civic engagement.... In PAGE 14: ...lar candidate. Education, gender, and age do not have a significant effect. Financial Contributions PSM suggests that campaign web site users are 11.2% more likely to give money to a political candidate than are nonusers ( Table1 0). This average effect is depicted in the left plot of Figure 6.... ..."