Results 1 - 10
of
12,381
Table 1: Consistency options provided by the Composable Consistency (CC) Model. Consistency semantics are expressed for an access session by choosing one of the alternative options in each row, which are mutually exclusive. Options in italics indicate reasonable defaults that provide close-to-open semantics suitable for many applications. In our discussion, when we leave an option unspecified, we assume its default value.
"... In PAGE 2: ... There are multiple reasonable options along each of these dimensions. Based on this classification, we de- veloped a novel composable consistency model that pro- vides the options listed in Table1 . When these options are combined in different ways, they yield a rich collec- tion of consistency semantics for shared data that cover the needs of a broad variety of applications.... In PAGE 3: ...pplications access (i.e., read or write) their data in ses- sions, and that consistency can be enforced at session boundaries or before and after each read or write access. In the CC model, an application expresses its consis- tency requirements for each session as a vector of con- sistency options , as listed in Table1 . Each row of the table indicates several mutually exclusive options avail- able to control the aspect of consistency indicated in its first column.... ..."
TABLE V MUTUAL EXCLUSIVE VTRD
Table 62: Time Information for mutual exclusion
1994
"... In PAGE 100: ...38 29.57 Table62 : Time Information for mutual exclusion... ..."
Cited by 131
Table 64: Time Information for mutual exclusion
1994
"... In PAGE 102: ...95 347.28 Table64 : Time Information for mutual exclusion... ..."
Cited by 131
Table 66: Time Information for mutual exclusion
1994
"... In PAGE 104: ...02 174.33 Table66 : Time Information for mutual exclusion... ..."
Cited by 131
Table 62: Time Information for mutual exclusion
1994
"... In PAGE 100: ...38 29.57 Table62 : Time Information for mutual exclusion... ..."
Cited by 131
Table 64: Time Information for mutual exclusion
1994
"... In PAGE 102: ...95 347.28 Table64 : Time Information for mutual exclusion... ..."
Cited by 131
Table 66: Time Information for mutual exclusion
1994
"... In PAGE 104: ...02 174.33 Table66 : Time Information for mutual exclusion... ..."
Cited by 131
Table 1. Reasoning on exclusions and dependencies.
2006
"... In PAGE 6: ... Reversely, if activity A becomes invalid then all activities C such that (C ) A) 2 Dep are made invalid (see rule /1/ below). Keeping the exclusions and dependencies explicitly has the advantage of stronger ltering ( Table1 ). In particular, if exclusion fA; Bg is to be added to Ex and there is a dependency (A ) B) 2 Dep then we can make activ- ity A invalid (and the exclusion is resolved so it does not need to be kept in Ex).... ..."
Cited by 4
Results 1 - 10
of
12,381