Results 1  10
of
132,010
The Foundation of a Generic Theorem Prover
 Journal of Automated Reasoning
, 1989
"... Isabelle [28, 30] is an interactive theorem prover that supports a variety of logics. It represents rules as propositions (not as functions) and builds proofs by combining rules. These operations constitute a metalogic (or `logical framework') in which the objectlogics are formalized. Isabell ..."
Abstract

Cited by 471 (48 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Isabelle [28, 30] is an interactive theorem prover that supports a variety of logics. It represents rules as propositions (not as functions) and builds proofs by combining rules. These operations constitute a metalogic (or `logical framework') in which the objectlogics are formalized
Automatic verification of finitestate concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications
 ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
, 1986
"... We give an efficient procedure for verifying that a finitestate concurrent system meets a specification expressed in a (propositional, branchingtime) temporal logic. Our algorithm has complexity linear in both the size of the specification and the size of the global state graph for the concurrent ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1388 (62 self)
 Add to MetaCart
system. We also show how this approach can be adapted to handle fairness. We argue that our technique can provide a practical alternative to manual proof construction or use of a mechanical theorem prover for verifying many finitestate concurrent systems. Experimental results show that state machines
Simplify: A theorem prover for program checking
 J. ACM
, 2003
"... This paper provides a detailed description of the automatic theorem prover Simplify, which is the proof engine of the Extended Static Checkers ESC/Java and ESC/Modula3. Simplify uses the NelsonOppen method to combine decision procedures for several important theories, and also employs a matcher to ..."
Abstract

Cited by 431 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper provides a detailed description of the automatic theorem prover Simplify, which is the proof engine of the Extended Static Checkers ESC/Java and ESC/Modula3. Simplify uses the NelsonOppen method to combine decision procedures for several important theories, and also employs a matcher
Model Checking Programs
, 2003
"... The majority of work carried out in the formal methods community throughout the last three decades has (for good reasons) been devoted to special languages designed to make it easier to experiment with mechanized formal methods such as theorem provers, proof checkers and model checkers. In this pape ..."
Abstract

Cited by 592 (63 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The majority of work carried out in the formal methods community throughout the last three decades has (for good reasons) been devoted to special languages designed to make it easier to experiment with mechanized formal methods such as theorem provers, proof checkers and model checkers
Construction of abstract state graphs with PVS
, 1997
"... We describe in this paper a method based on abstract interpretation which, from a theoretical point of view, is similar to the splitting methods proposed in [DGG93, Dam96] but the weaker abstract transition relation we use, allows us to construct automatically abstract state graphs paying a reasonab ..."
Abstract

Cited by 742 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. This successor m 0 can be determined exactly if for each predicate ' i it can be determined if ' i or :' i is a postcondition of m for ΓΈ . In order to do this, we use the Pvs theorem prover [SOR93] and our Pvsinterface defined in [GS96]. If the tactic used for the proof of the verification
PVS: A Prototype Verification System
 CADE
, 1992
"... PVS is a prototype system for writing specifications and constructing proofs. Its development has been shaped by our experiences studying or using several other systems and performing a number of rather substantial formal verifications (e.g., [5,6,8]). PVS is fully implemented and freely available. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 655 (16 self)
 Add to MetaCart
automation for an impoverished logic, and others that feature expressive logics but only limited automation. PVS attempts to tread the middle ground between these two classes by providing mechanical assistance to support clear and abstract specifications, and readable yet sound proofs for difficult theorems
A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition
 Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
, 1998
"... The tutorial starts with an overview of the concepts of VC dimension and structural risk minimization. We then describe linear Support Vector Machines (SVMs) for separable and nonseparable data, working through a nontrivial example in detail. We describe a mechanical analogy, and discuss when SV ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3393 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The tutorial starts with an overview of the concepts of VC dimension and structural risk minimization. We then describe linear Support Vector Machines (SVMs) for separable and nonseparable data, working through a nontrivial example in detail. We describe a mechanical analogy, and discuss when
Recursive Functions of Symbolic Expressions and Their Computation by Machine, Part I
, 1960
"... this paper in L a T E Xpartly supported by ARPA (ONR) grant N000149410775 to Stanford University where John McCarthy has been since 1962. Copied with minor notational changes from CACM, April 1960. If you want the exact typography, look there. Current address, John McCarthy, Computer Science Depa ..."
Abstract

Cited by 457 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
applications of our recursive function formalism to mathematical logic and to the problem of mechanical theorem proving. 2 Functions and Function Definitions
A Parallel Repetition Theorem
 SIAM Journal on Computing
, 1998
"... We show that a parallel repetition of any twoprover oneround proof system (MIP(2, 1)) decreases the probability of error at an exponential rate. No constructive bound was previously known. The constant in the exponent (in our analysis) depends only on the original probability of error and on the t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 362 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We show that a parallel repetition of any twoprover oneround proof system (MIP(2, 1)) decreases the probability of error at an exponential rate. No constructive bound was previously known. The constant in the exponent (in our analysis) depends only on the original probability of error
Results 1  10
of
132,010