Results 1 - 10
of
919
TABLE 1[[ MULTIPLEXER CENTER FRI!XJUENCIES
Table 3: K : (HA HA) ) A
"... In PAGE 7: ... This explains the case analysis in the de nition of syn below. syn(p1; p2) = CC(K; p1; p2); the cases covered by K : (HA HA) ) A are summarised in the symmetric Table3 where com : N N A A ) A is com(x; y; p; q) = M(x; y; tau(par(p; q))), and close : N N A A ) A is close(x; y; p0; q0) = M(x; y; tau(R( par (p0; q0)))). !in : N; (N ) A) ! A replicated input !out : N; N; A ! A replicated output !bout : N; (N ) A) ! A replicated bound output !tau : A ! A replicated internal action are de ned by recursion (but not mutual recursion) as follows: !in(a; f) = in(a; b : N.... ..."
Table 5. Comparison of educational level to Fry index across all employees
1999
"... In PAGE 46: ...As can be seen from Table5 , none of the workers at Company D had an educational level that fell below the readability index of the materials from their site. This location did make use of Association of American Railroads (AAR) prepared materials and text from the U.... ..."
Table 6. Comparison of estimated instructional reading level to Fry index
1999
TABLE 8. Sockeye fry emergence rates during June, 1999 (fry per m2 per 30 days) on Chignik Lake beaches.
Table 2. Rice acreage estimates and rice statistics. Commune SAR estimate (ha) Statistics 1997 (ha) Difference (ha)
"... In PAGE 5: ...creage of rice fields e.g. at the commune level. Table2... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
919