Results 1 - 10
of
31,574
Table - 3 . References made by journals and monographs to other forms of material
2004
Cited by 4
Table 2.1. of this monograph, the wrinkling value of the applied stresses is equal to
Table 3. Comparison of recognition results for monophone and monograph acoustic sub-word models (VERBMOBIL only).
2002
"... In PAGE 2: ...1. Context-Independent Sub-Word Models Table3 compares recognition results on the German VERB- MOBIL corpus for phonetic and graphemic sub-word units if Table 2. Baseline recognition results using manually designed phonetic pronunciation lexica with variants and state-tying based on context-dependent triphones.... In PAGE 2: ... the duration of the graphemic HMM state sequences for German sounds like sch or ch is much longer than a single phone and does not match the true acoustic lengths anymore. This observation is emphasized by the large amount of deletions in Table3 and the larger number of running graphemes as can be seen in Table 1. Table 3.... ..."
Cited by 8
Table 13 : Reference types for which structured SGML is created. Book includes monographs and
Table 1.1: Common kernels of order 2. I( ) denotes the indicator function. A good introduction to kernel density estimation with an interesting collection of its use in data analysis is given by the monograph of Silverman (1986). It turns out that the choice of h is much more important for the behaviour of ^ fh(x) than the choice of K. Small values of h make the estimate look \wiggly quot; and show spurious features, whereas to big values of h will lead to an estimate which is too smooth in 3
1993
Cited by 11
Table 1. Effector Dynamics and Limits.
Table 2 - DS1 Synchronization Codewords (First Generation Synchronization Status
Table 2 - DS1 Synchronization Codewords (First Generation Synchronization Status
Results 1 - 10
of
31,574