A challenge for organizations is to manage electronic information without exposing the organization to sanctions in a later lawsuit. Since organizations do not usually voluntarily disclose internal information, the recent amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, applicable

, or repealed so as to make the agency’s regulatory program more effective or less burdensome in achieving the regulatory objectives. As such, our proposed rule seeks to reduce costs on firms generally, including small business entities, by removing outdated regulations. In addition, the grandfathering and VHF

In recent years, simple policy rules have received attention as a means to a more transparent and effective monetary policy. Often, however, the analysis is based on unrealistic assumptions about the timeliness of data availability. This permits rule specifications that are not operational

(forthcoming) (objecting to the tendency of committees to follow the exact language of statutes and court opinions). This will not be the first or last article that criticizes thestyle of drafting in federal statutes. But it will, I believe,be different in at least one respect: it will scrutinize

of electronically stored information make it imperative for organizations to develop an enterprise-wide strategy to manage its volume.

We provide the first empirical assessment of the ossification thesis, the widely accepted notion that procedural constraints on federal agencies have greatly hindered the ability of those agencies to formulate policy through notice and comment rule-making. Using data that cover all active federal

books have recently given examples of industry misuse of science, ‘Doubt is their product ’ by David Michaels and ‘Defending the indefensible’ by McCullogh and Tweedale. Michaels gives examples of hostile data reanalysis, and among other things, he discusses the impact on journals of US Federal Rule

books have recently given examples of industry misuse of science, ‘Doubt is their product ’ by David Michaels and ‘Defending the indefensible’ by McCullogh and Tweedale. Michaels gives examples of hostile data reanalysis, and among other things, he discusses the impact on journals of US Federal Rule

. This article analyzes several indexes of ‘perceived corruption’ compiled from business risk surveys for the 1980s and 1990s. Six arguments find support. Countries with Protestant traditions, histories of British rule, more developed economies, and (probably) higher imports were less ‘corrupt’. Federal states

The original front cover art for the