• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 310
Next 10 →

1Implementing Fault-Tolerant Consensus Over Unknown Networks

by Victor Costa
"... Abstract—With the interest for mobile ad-hoc systems growing quickly, a demand for applications which ensure reliability in spite of failures, as well as high dynamism, self-organization and mobility will rise. Our work contributes with the still incipient research on dependable ad-hoc computing by ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
by providing the design and performance study of one of the major problems in this domain: consensus. Recently, this problem has been redefined – by taking into account the dynamic nature of self-organizing networks – and has been renamed FT-CUP (fault tolerant consensus with unknown participants). Our work

1Byzantine Fault-Tolerant Consensus in Wireless Ad hoc Networks

by Henrique Moniz, Nuno F. Neves, Miguel Correia
"... Abstract—Wireless ad hoc networks, due to their inherent unreliability, pose significant challenges to the task of achieving tight coordination amongst nodes. The failure of some nodes and momentary breakdown of communications, either of accidental or malicious nature, should not result in the failu ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
-Widmayer impossibility results, which is achieved through randomization. Finally, the protocol was prototyped and subject to a comparative performance evaluation against two well-known Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus protocols. The results show that, due to its design, Turquois outperforms the other protocols by more

On the Cost of Fault-Tolerant Consensus When There Are No Faults - A Tutorial

by Idit Keidar, Sergio Rajsbaum , 2001
"... We consider the consensus problem in asynchronous models enriched with unreliable failure detectors or partial synchrony, where processes can crash or links may fail by losing messages. ..."
Abstract - Cited by 68 (8 self) - Add to MetaCart
We consider the consensus problem in asynchronous models enriched with unreliable failure detectors or partial synchrony, where processes can crash or links may fail by losing messages.

Departamento de Informática ACHIEVING FAULT-TOLERANT CONSENSUS IN AD HOC NETWORKS

by Mestrado Em, Universidade De Lisboa, Mestrado Em, Doutor Nuno, Fuentecilla Maia, Ferreira Neves , 2013
"... This work was partially supported by: CE through project FP7-257475 (MASSIF) FCT through the multianual program (LaSIGE) PTDC/EIA-EIA/113729/2009 (SITAN) Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my advisor, prof. Nuno Neves, for accepting me as his student, helping me with every issue I faced du ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
This work was partially supported by: CE through project FP7-257475 (MASSIF) FCT through the multianual program (LaSIGE) PTDC/EIA-EIA/113729/2009 (SITAN) Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my advisor, prof. Nuno Neves, for accepting me as his student, helping me with every issue I faced during the research period, establish a high bar for every task assigned to me, improving the overall quality of my work and for his patience in clarifying every question I had. I want to acknowledge Faculty of Sciences, particularly the Department of Informa-tics. During this years I had the opportunity to learn so much, acquire lots of good ex-periences, met good colleagues and Professors who were very helpful in every issue I faced. I also want to thank the Navigators research team for their welcoming, support and fellowship. I also want to thank my close friends for the moral support and company during hard

Consensus in the presence of partial synchrony

by Cynthia Dwork, Nancy Lynch, Larry Stockmeyer - JOURNAL OF THE ACM , 1988
"... The concept of partial synchrony in a distributed system is introduced. Partial synchrony lies between the cases of a synchronous system and an asynchronous system. In a synchronous system, there is a known fixed upper bound A on the time required for a message to be sent from one processor to ano ..."
Abstract - Cited by 513 (18 self) - Add to MetaCart
T occurs. Fault-tolerant consensus protocols are given for various cases of partial synchrony and various fault models. Lower bounds that show in most cases that our protocols are optimal with respect to the number of faults tolerated are also given. Our consensus protocols for partially synchronous

Lower Bounds on Consensus

by Leslie Lamport , 2000
"... We derive lower bounds on the number of messages and the number of message delays required by a nonblocking fault-tolerant consensus algorithm, and we show that variants of the Paxos algorithm achieve those bounds. ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
We derive lower bounds on the number of messages and the number of message delays required by a nonblocking fault-tolerant consensus algorithm, and we show that variants of the Paxos algorithm achieve those bounds.

Fault-Tolerant Distributed Consensus

by Lawrence Kesteloot , 1995
"... A fault-tolerant system is one that can sustain a reasonable number of process or communication failures, both intermittent and permanent. The ability to ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
A fault-tolerant system is one that can sustain a reasonable number of process or communication failures, both intermittent and permanent. The ability to

Fast Byzantine consensus

by Jean-Philippe Martin, Lorenzo Alvisi - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEPENDABLE AND SECURE COMPUTING , 2005
"... Abstract — We present the first protocol that reaches asynchronous Byzantine consensus in two communication steps in the common case. We prove that our protocol is optimal in terms of both number of communication steps, and number of processes for two-step consensus. The protocol can be used to buil ..."
Abstract - Cited by 93 (6 self) - Add to MetaCart
). We show that this parameterized two-step consensus protocol is also optimal in terms of both number of communication steps, and number of processes. Index Terms — Distributed systems, Byzantine fault tolerance, Consensus

Value-fusion versus decision-fusion for fault-tolerance in collaborative target detection in sensor networks

by Thomas Clouqueur, Parameswaran Ramanathan, Kewal K. Saluja, Kuang-ching Wang - In Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Information Fusion , 2001
"... Abstract – Collaborative signal processing algorithms in sensor networks must be robust to device failures because one expects a large number of failures due to the harsh conditions in which they are usually deployed. In this paper, we study two distinct approaches, value-fusion and decisionfusion, ..."
Abstract - Cited by 36 (10 self) - Add to MetaCart
, for achieving fault-tolerance in collaborative target detection algorithms. In value-fusion, sensor devices first exchange their measured values to arrive at a fault-tolerant consensus on the measurement. Then each device makes an independent decision as to whether or not a target is present based

Consensus and collision detectors in radio networks

by Gregory Chockler, Murat Demirbas, Seth Gilbert, Nancy Lynch, Calvin Newport, Tina Nolte , 2008
"... We consider the fault-tolerant consensus problem in radio networks with crash-prone nodes. Specifically, we develop lower bounds and matching upper bounds for this problem in single-hop radios networks, where all nodes are located within broadcast range of each other. In a novel break from existing ..."
Abstract - Cited by 15 (8 self) - Add to MetaCart
We consider the fault-tolerant consensus problem in radio networks with crash-prone nodes. Specifically, we develop lower bounds and matching upper bounds for this problem in single-hop radios networks, where all nodes are located within broadcast range of each other. In a novel break from
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 310
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University