This report describes the results of automated facial expression analysis by the CMU/Pittsburgh group. An interdisciplinary team of consultants, who have combined expertise in computer vision and in facial analysis, will compare the results of this report with those in a separate report submitted by UCSD group. BACKGROUND People communicate not only by speech and written language but also by their tone of voice, the way they stand or move and their patterns of gaze. These modes of nonverbal behavior communicate emotion and often are referred to as paralinguistic because they modify, substitute for, and improve the understanding of spoken communication. Of the various modes of nonverbal communication, the human face is especially important. Facial expressions can indicate emotion and pain, regulate social behavior, and reveal brain function. A large literature in psychology (Ekman & Rosenberg, 1997), comparative biology (Darwin, 1872/1998; Fridlund, 1994; Schmidt & Coh

is the state of the art in manual measurement of facial actions. FACS coding, however, is labor intensive and difficult to standardize. A goal of automated FACS coding is to eliminate the need for manual coding and realize automatic recognition and analysis of facial actions. Success of this effort

Abstract. FACS (Facial Action Coding System) coding is the state of the art in manual measurement of facial actions. FACS coding, however, is labor intensive and difficult to standardize. A goal of automated FACS coding is to eliminate the need for manual coding and realize automatic recognition

Abstract. FACS (Facial Action Coding System) coding is the state of the art in manual measurement of facial actions. FACS coding, however, is labor intensive and difficult to standardize. A goal of automated FACS coding is to eliminate the need for manual coding and realize automatic recognition

an automated method of facial display analysis. In this report we compare the results with those of manual FACS (Facial Action Coding System, Ekman & Friesen, 1978a) coding. One hundred university students were videotaped while performing a series of facial displays. The image sequences were coded from

-Pittsburgh AU-Coded Face Expression Image Database, which currently includes 2105 digitized image sequences from 182 adult subjects of varying ethnicity, performing multiple tokens of most primary FACS action units. This database is the most comprehensive test-bed to date for comparative studies of facial

recognizes fine-grained changes in facial expression into action units (AUs) of the Facial Action Coding System (FACS), instead of a few prototypic expressions. Multistate face and facial component models are proposed for tracking and modeling the various facial features, including lips, eyes, brows, cheeks

's independent muscle action groups, as well as an accurate estimate of facial motion. Previous efforts at analysis of facial expression have been based on the Facial Action Coding System (FACS), a representation developed in order to allow human psychologists to code expression from static pictures. To avoid

AbstractÐThe Facial Action Coding System (FACS) [23] is an objective method for quantifying facial movement in terms of component actions. This system is widely used in behavioral investigations of emotion, cognitive processes, and social interaction. The coding is presently performed by highly

This chapter describes the Forced Authorization Code (FAC) feature in Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express (Cisco Unified CME) 8.5 and later versions.