"... In PAGE 2: ... Authentication is a one-to-one test. Existing user authentication techniques are described in Table1 . Identification answers the question Who is this person? or more precisely Is this person a member of this group? It is a much more difficult question because it requires a one-to-N matching.... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ... Independent UK e-journals Table 9. Original eLib e-journals Table10 . Parallel e-journal projects within eLib Table 11.... In PAGE 18: ... Parallel e-journals Progress of parallel journals can hardly be measured by volume of output as above. Instead, these projects might be viewed more as trialling new technologies, especially formats, in a real publishing environment ( Table10 ). Thus the CLIC project, which is working with the Royal Society of Chemistry to build an enhanced online version of Chemical Communications, is experimenting with new formats such as VRML (virtual reality markup language), but its real significance is the overall scope of its work and its ability to set the agenda and influence standards for electronic information within the field of chemistry.... ..."

"... In PAGE 10: ... Table3 presents the number of articles by journal and year. It shows that 28 different journals have published articles on ECCRM.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... 4. Results Table2 shows the data obtained from the five system releases and the correction release, which was performed after the system test. The total column shows the cumulative/average data from the releases.... In PAGE 7: ...IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE 2004), Redondo Beach CA, USA control over the project. The reason for this can be found from Table2 (row 14) where actual median effort spent on a single task is shown. The development team intentionally strove for smaller task segments in order to improve their work control mechanisms.... In PAGE 7: ... However, in this particular case, the XP team mitigated the estimation problem by defining considerably smaller tasks. This is evidenced in the data also by the number of tasks identified ( Table2 , row 13). The project manager was able to take necessary actions on daily rather than on weekly basis.... ..."

"... In PAGE 14: ...results are summarized in Table3 . The #0Crst line represent the base case; each additional line of the table represents an independent enhancement.... In PAGE 14: ...2.#29 The last rowof Table3 shows the e#0Bect of using all enhancements at once. One can see that the combined enhancements are quite e#0Bective at reducing the noise while keeping the a#0Enityat roughly the same levels.... In PAGE 14: ...oughly the same levels. We note that the parameter values we used for the enhancements #28e.g., the number of occurrences that makesachunk #5Ccommon quot;#29 worked well for our collection, but probably have to be adjusted for larger collections. In Figure 3 we study the e#0Bect of increasing the number of overlapping sentences per chunk #28without any of the enhancements of Table3 #29. The solid line shows the average noise as a function of the number of overlapping sentences in a chunk.... In PAGE 15: ... Table 4 explores this issue. The #0Crst row is for the basic COPS algorithm; the second rowis for the version that includes all the enhancements of Table3 . The #0Crst, third, and #0Cfth columns are as before and are only included for reference.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... used in their 1996 study of faculty productivity and eliminated two software engineering journals (ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology and IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering) as well as IEEE Transactions on VLSI, which does not appear in the list of IEEE Computer Society publications. 4 Table1 pre- sents the 13 journals examined. We used a sampling approach that enabled us to se- lect approximately 500 articles for evaluation.... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ...Table 1: Journal of Observations vations occurring over a wide range of hour angle and with no particular sampling pattern (see Table1 ). We have found that, in practice, an irregular sampling pattern is desirable because it minimizes windowing e ects in the time delay analysis.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ...0 298 100.0 The distribution of articles is shown in Table1 . The Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation (GD amp;N) leads the sample with 21.... In PAGE 10: ... Table 10 shows that a prescriptive approach dominates GSS research. Table1 0: Sample by Decision-making Approach 1 1990 - 1994 1995 - 1999 2000 - 2003 Total No of Articles % of Period No of Articles % of Period No of Articles % of Period No of Articles % of Sample Descriptive 23 21.... In PAGE 10: ... Table 11 shows that a behavioural approach dominates DSS research. Table1 1: Sample by Decision-making Approach 2 1990 - 1994 1995 - 1999 2000 - 2003 Total No of Articles % of Period No of Articles % of Period No of Articles % of Period No of Articles % of Sample Economic 8 7.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ...2 hours of total integration time over three nights of observation. A journal of the observation dates, exposure times, wavelength coverages and resolution of the data are presented in Table1 . We used the C5 decker plate with 1.... In PAGE 5: ...re presented in Table 1. We used the C5 decker plate with 1.100 slit, the kv380 lter to eliminate 2nd order blue wavelengths, and standard 2 1 binning on the 2048 x 2048 Tektronix CCD. As Table1 indicates, we used two di erent CCD alignments covering two di erent wavelength regions for our observations. The setup provided a resolution (FWHM) ranging from 7.... In PAGE 34: ...Transition Apparent VPFIT EqW Adopted FeII 1611 15:461 0:020 15:454 0:058 15:458 0:058 NiII 1709 13:902 0:010 13:880 0:054 NiII 1741 13:878 0:006 NiII 1751 13:912 0:010 SiII 1808 15:794 0:005 15:807 0:059 15:801 0:059 CrII 2056 13:628 0:009 13:645 0:062 13:753 0:062 CrII 2066 13:681 0:013 ZnII 2026 12:935 0:009 12:912 0:057 12:924 0:057 CuII 1358 12:992 0:063 12:929 0:068 12:962 0:065 GeII 1602 lt; 12:430 lt; 12:431 lt; 12:430 TiII 1910 12:807 0:038 12:807 0:038 C IV 1548 16:804 0:675 16:804 0:675 AlIII 1854 13:874 0:003 13:887 0:013 13:881 0:013 Table1 0: IONIC COLUMN DENSITIES FOR z = 1.920 Note.... In PAGE 35: ...Transition Apparent VPFIT EqW Adopted FeII 1608 13:296 0:018 13:342 0:016 13:320 0:016 AlII 1670 12:174 0:012 12:194 0:014 12:184 0:014 SiII 1304 13:756 0:037 13:756 0:037 C II 1334 14:151 0:069 gt; 14:151 NiII 1751 lt; 12:289 lt; 12:305 lt; 12:297 CrII 2056 12:12 0:12 12:10 0:13 12:11 0:13 ZnII 2026 lt; 11:330 lt; 11:342 lt; 11:336 Si IV 1402 12:833 0:019 12:848 0:017 C IV 1548 13:713 0:005 13:727 0:055 Table1... In PAGE 36: ...Transition Apparent Adopted FeII 2374 14:611 0:030 14:611 0:030 FeII 2260 14:743 0:084 MgI 2852 12:364 0:006 12:364 0:006 MnII 2606 12:420 0:053 12:532 0:053 MnII 2594 12:386 0:051 MnII 2576 12:641 0:018 TiII 3073 12:243 0:067 12:300 0:030 TiII 3242 12:319 0:034 TiII 3384 12:228 0:021 Table1 2: IONIC COLUMN DENSITIES FOR z = 0.752 Transition Apparent VPFIT Adopted FeII 2382 12:318 0:050 12:401 0:034 12:401 0:034 FeII 2586 11:936 0:391 FeII 2600 12:452 0:046 MgII 2796 13:069 0:008 13:342 0:038 13:342 0:038 MgII 2803 13:146 0:006 MgI 2852 10:81 0:15 10:81 0:15 Table 13: IONIC COLUMN DENSITIES FOR z = 0.... In PAGE 36: ...Transition Apparent Adopted FeII 2374 14:611 0:030 14:611 0:030 FeII 2260 14:743 0:084 MgI 2852 12:364 0:006 12:364 0:006 MnII 2606 12:420 0:053 12:532 0:053 MnII 2594 12:386 0:051 MnII 2576 12:641 0:018 TiII 3073 12:243 0:067 12:300 0:030 TiII 3242 12:319 0:034 TiII 3384 12:228 0:021 Table 12: IONIC COLUMN DENSITIES FOR z = 0.752 Transition Apparent VPFIT Adopted FeII 2382 12:318 0:050 12:401 0:034 12:401 0:034 FeII 2586 11:936 0:391 FeII 2600 12:452 0:046 MgII 2796 13:069 0:008 13:342 0:038 13:342 0:038 MgII 2803 13:146 0:006 MgI 2852 10:81 0:15 10:81 0:15 Table1 3: IONIC COLUMN DENSITIES FOR z = 0.948 Transition Apparent VPFIT Adopted FeII 2344 14:168 0:086 FeII 2374 14:242 0:008 14:285 0:026 14:285 0:026 FeII 2586 14:212 0:007 14:285 0:026 MgI 2852 12:236 0:007 12:247 0:024 12:247 0:024... In PAGE 36: ...752 Transition Apparent VPFIT Adopted FeII 2382 12:318 0:050 12:401 0:034 12:401 0:034 FeII 2586 11:936 0:391 FeII 2600 12:452 0:046 MgII 2796 13:069 0:008 13:342 0:038 13:342 0:038 MgII 2803 13:146 0:006 MgI 2852 10:81 0:15 10:81 0:15 Table 13: IONIC COLUMN DENSITIES FOR z = 0.948 Transition Apparent VPFIT Adopted FeII 2344 14:168 0:086 FeII 2374 14:242 0:008 14:285 0:026 14:285 0:026 FeII 2586 14:212 0:007 14:285 0:026 MgI 2852 12:236 0:007 12:247 0:024 12:247 0:024 Table1... In PAGE 37: ...Metal log10N(X) (cm?2) [X/H] Fe 15:458 0:058 ?0:705 0:097 Ni 13:891 0:054 ?1:012 0:095 Si 15:801 0:059 ?0:402 0:098 Cr 13:753 0:062 ?0:580 0:100 Ti 12:807 0:038 ?0:776 0:081 Zn 12:924 0:057 ?0:379 0:097 Cu 12:962 0:065 0:039 0:102 Ge lt; 12:430 lt; 0:147 Table1 5: ABUNDANCES FOR z = 1.920 Metal log10N(X) (cm?2) [X/H] Fe 13:320 0:016 ?2:621 0:071 Al 12:184 0:014 ?2:727 0:070 Si 13:756 0:037 ?2:225 0:075 Ni lt; 12:297 lt; ?2:384 Cr 12:11 0:13 ?2:00 0:15 Zn lt; 11:336 lt; ?1:745 C gt; 14:151 gt; ?2:840... In PAGE 37: ...Metal log10N(X) (cm?2) [X/H] Fe 15:458 0:058 ?0:705 0:097 Ni 13:891 0:054 ?1:012 0:095 Si 15:801 0:059 ?0:402 0:098 Cr 13:753 0:062 ?0:580 0:100 Ti 12:807 0:038 ?0:776 0:081 Zn 12:924 0:057 ?0:379 0:097 Cu 12:962 0:065 0:039 0:102 Ge lt; 12:430 lt; 0:147 Table 15: ABUNDANCES FOR z = 1.920 Metal log10N(X) (cm?2) [X/H] Fe 13:320 0:016 ?2:621 0:071 Al 12:184 0:014 ?2:727 0:070 Si 13:756 0:037 ?2:225 0:075 Ni lt; 12:297 lt; ?2:384 Cr 12:11 0:13 ?2:00 0:15 Zn lt; 11:336 lt; ?1:745 C gt; 14:151 gt; ?2:840 Table1... ..."