Results 1 - 10
of
20,821
Table 2: Average number of hops and cost in the multicast tree generated under di erent routing schemes for delay-sensitive applications:Group Size=5,Load=70
1998
Cited by 7
Table 4: Average number of hops and cost in the multicast tree generated under di erent routing schemes for delay-sensitive applications: Group Size=20, Load=30
1998
Cited by 7
Table 4: Results for Example 2: Delay-sensitive ows.
1998
Cited by 47
Table 1: Applications Used and Suggested QoS Classes The programs that were used for each of the above applications were Pocket Internet Explorer (web surfing), Pocket Outlook (E-mail), Rucksun Scotty FTP, and Pocket Windows Media Player 8.0 (video streaming). As can be seen from Table 1, three of the four applications use the connection-oriented TCP protocol, while the connectionless User Datagram Protocol (UDP) is used for the most delay sensitive video streaming application. Standard protocols such as Hyper-Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP), File Transfer Protocol (FTP), Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP), and Real Time Transport Protocol (RTP), are used at the application layer. The second column in Table 1 suggests for each application a classification using the four standard ETSI traffic classes,
2003
Cited by 1
Table IV. Delay Sensitivity to Main factors
Table 3: Allocation of bandwidth to the queues, compared to amount of actual traffic.
"... In PAGE 33: ... Then, we proceed with Step 5: Bandwidth allocation: To provide a service that reflects the delay sensitivity of the applications we choose an un-fair allocation scheme. A possible allocation is shown in Table3 below. ... ..."
TABLE IV CRITICAL PATH DELAY SENSITIVITY OF MULTIPLIER CIRCUIT TO THE MAIN FACTORS
1998
Cited by 6
Table 1 - Example user_priority to service mappings
1998
"... In PAGE 7: ...2. Default service mappings Table1 presents the default mapping from delay targets to IEEE 802.1 user_priority classes.... In PAGE 7: ... Such mechanisms are for further study. The delay bounds numbers proposed in Table1 are for per-Bandwidth Allocator element delay targets and are derived from a subjective analysis of the needs of typical delay-sensitive applications e.g.... ..."
Table 1 - Example user_priority to service mappings
"... In PAGE 7: ...2. Default service mappings Table1 presents the default mapping from delay targets to IEEE 802.1 user_priority classes.... In PAGE 8: ... The delay bounds numbers proposed in Table1 are for per-Bandwidth Allocator element delay targets and are derived from a subjective analysis of the needs of typical delay-sensitive applications e.g.... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
20,821