Results 1 - 10
of
22,437
Table 5. Examples of Completed, In Progress, and Future Research Objectives for Metabolic Enhancement of the Soldier
"... In PAGE 10: ... The USARIEM research is directed at ensuring that scientific soundness and further ensuring the protection and enhancement of the health and performance of all warfighters. The USARIEM research effort with thrust areas and core capabilities aligned with near and far term applications is captured in Table5 . Current efforts to understand the fundamental metabolic processes underlying the responses to operational stressors, most importantly the neurophysiological responses that affect cognitive, psychomotor, and emotional status, are critical investments in the health and performance of the future Soldier.... ..."
Table 3: User groups and planned technology
1997
Cited by 1
Table 2: Current Planning Agenda vs. Sustainable Planning Agenda6
2004
"... In PAGE 9: ...ften faced by short-term pressures (e.g., to be the lowest bidders) that constrain the long-term view needed for sustainability to be achieved (see Section IVb on the Ford case). In addition to system design, the notion of system change needs to be applied to the planning ( Table2 ) and operation of engineering systems as well. By focusing on system design, planning, and operations, the definitions of sustainability developed for each CLIOS will ultimately need to balance trade-offs among economic development and social and environmental goals.... ..."
Table 11. Abandonment of current product technologies - technology push
"... In PAGE 21: ... Two outstanding factors are decrease in the demand for products containing the technology and explicit demands of institutional customers to shift to new technologies. Shift to technologies providing cost advantage is the prevalent reason for phasing-out of product technologies ( Table11 ). Cost reduction is the focal point of new product technologies in the automotive industry.... ..."
Table 1: Deployment Process Coverage in Current Technologies.
1998
"... In PAGE 13: ... The results of our sampling of technologies are collected into two tables. Table1 presents a characterization of the technologies in terms of process coverage. Table 2 assesses their support for changeability, coordination, and model abstraction.... ..."
Cited by 40
Table 1: Deployment Process Coverage in Current Technologies.
1998
"... In PAGE 14: ... The results of our sampling of technologies are collected into two tables. Table1 presents a characterization of the technologies in terms of process coverage. Table 2 assesses their support for changeability, coordination, and model abstraction.... ..."
Cited by 40
Table 1: Deployment Process Coverage in Current Technologies.
1998
"... In PAGE 14: ... The results of our sampling of technologies are collected into two tables. Table1 presents a characterization of the technologies in terms of process coverage. Table 2 assesses their support for changeability, coordination, and model abstraction.... ..."
Cited by 40
Table 26: Dissatisfaction with current Part D plan
"... In PAGE 48: ... Each question was answered on a five-point scale (poor, fair, good, very good, excellent). The results are summarized in Table26 where we report the proportion of respondents who were dissatisfied ( poor or fair ratings). Overall, 17.... In PAGE 49: ... Also, an increase in the premium of the 2006 plan in 2007 made respondents consider a switch. When we add plan dissatisfaction, defined as in Table26 , it also has a positive and strong effect on considering a switch. These variables have similar effects on the actual switching decision.... ..."
Table 4. Comparison of Current Technology Conventional and Advanced Technology Concept B
2004
Cited by 2
Table 1. Comparison of current component technologies
2000
Cited by 1
Results 1 - 10
of
22,437