Results 1 - 10
of
232
Table 1 summarises the compatibility specifications for each of the JVMs.
2005
"... In PAGE 4: ... Table1 : Mobile JVM compatibility 4.4 Mobile OGSI.... ..."
Cited by 4
Table 4. Evaluation of Interleaf and Mosaic [FC, fully compliant; PC, partially compliant, NC, not compliant]
1994
"... In PAGE 69: ... Large collections: Commerical systems have been demonstrated on very large collections. Table4 . Evaluation of Interleaf and Mosaic [FC, fully compliant; PC, partially compliant, NC, not compliant] Requirement Interleaf NCSA Mosaic Basic 1FCFC 2F 3FCFC 4F 5FCPC 6F F 7FCC 8P P 9NCFC Preferred 1FCPC 2F 3FCNC 4F P 5FCFC 6P 7PCFC 8F 9PCPC 10 PC PC 11 FC... ..."
Table 4. Evaluation of Interleaf and Mosaic [FC, fully compliant; PC, partially compliant, NC, not compliant]
1994
"... In PAGE 12: ... Large collections: Commerical systems have been demonstrated on very large collections. Table4 . Evaluation of Interleaf and Mosaic [FC, fully compliant; PC, partially compliant, NC, not compliant] Requirement Interleaf NCSA Mosaic Basic 1FCFC 2F 3FCFC 4F 5FCPC 6F F 7FCC 8P P 9NCFC Preferred 1FCPC 2F 3FCNC 4F P 5FCFC 6P 7PCFC 8F 9PCPC 10 PC PC 11 FC... ..."
Table 1. Substitutions for XML compliant logic sentences
"... In PAGE 6: ... A simple substitution of text provides the solution for this problem, where the illegal XML character sequences are replaced with legal ones. The substitutions currently being used to represent FOPC in an XML compliant syntax are shown in Table1 . Note that the substitutions for - gt; and | are not necessitated by XML standards, but are done so that the XML logic uses a consistent representation formalism.... In PAGE 6: ... The XML compliant substitutions also become reserved words in the logic representation language. Since the words in the right column of Table1 will be substituted with the logic symbols in the left column, words in the right-hand side of the table are reserved words that cannot be used for logic predicates or function names. ... ..."
TABLE III COMPLIANT CONTACT MODEL PARAMETERS.
2005
Cited by 10
TABLE III COMPLIANT CONTACT MODEL PARAMETERS.
Table 3 lists the platforms and JVMs we used for measuring per-
Table 3: VRML 2.0-compliant Browsers
"... In PAGE 7: ... As VRML 2.0 is a new standard, the number of compliant browsers is relatively small ( Table3 ). Further on, none of them fully supports all VRML 2.... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
232