### Table 5. Java binary traffic model Type Percenta

"... In PAGE 6: ... Its file size conforms to the same distribution. Table5 shows the Java binary traffic model we used in our experiment.... ..."

### Table 2: Range, precision, and length of binary representation of model parameters.

"... In PAGE 2: ... The differing number of parameters calls for variable length chromosomes within the GA12. The range, precision and the length of binary represen- tation of the parameters are given in Table2 . Model parameters and individual chromosome lengths are given in Table 3.... ..."

### Table 2: Parameter Estimates of Best Fitting Binary Logit Models

2003

"... In PAGE 14: ...ear was 1993-94 when respondent was 28.4 years of age. We begin the multivariate analysis by estimating the model for the log odds of attending University. The estimates of the best fitting model are shown in the left panel of Table2 . Some of the results are predictable: the effect of age is indeed quadratic and, as indicated by the positive interaction between Male and Age, peaks later for men than for women.... In PAGE 15: ... In short, the odds of university attendance were stable during the period but more importantly, universities did not become more socially selective nor did the competition with the new second-tier system lower social selection at universities. In the right-hand panel of Table2 we repeat the analysis for the attendance at either a university or a college (i.... ..."

### Table 3. Binary Logit Models for Support of Pricing and Infrastructure Improvement Policies

"... In PAGE 6: ...related policies. The results are shown in Table3 . There appears to be greater support for pricing among long-term residents of Austin, but also among young persons.... ..."

### Table A.1: ISPs binary models, variables summary statistics Variable Mean Std. Dev. Min Max

### Table A.1: ISPs binary models, variables summary statistics Variable Mean Std. Dev. Min Max

### Table IV. The Computation Time for the VFA Algorithm for Larger Problem Instances k Binary Model (s) Probability Model (min) k Binary Model (s) Probability Model (min) 40 21 1.8 70 46 3.6

2004

Cited by 27