• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 11 - 20 of 4,218
Next 10 →

Tables null Tables cited sequentially in text manuscript.

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2005

Table 1. Overall performance of Otter, leanCoP, and lolliCoP

in lolliCoP -- A Linear Logic Implementation of a Lean Connection-Method Theorem Prover for First-Order Classical Logic
by Joshua S. Hodas, Naoyuki Tamura 2001
"... In PAGE 11: ...1 (with MACE 1.4) [8, 10] are shown in Table1 . Due to the time needed to run these systems on the entire library, the results are those provided by their respective authors (in the case of leanCoP they come from a manuscript in preparation).... ..."
Cited by 3

Table 1. Overall performance of Otter, leanCoP, and lolliCoP

in lolliCoP - A Linear Logic Implementation of a Lean Connection-Method Theorem Prover for First-Order Classical Logic
by Joshua S. Hodas, Naoyuki Tamura 2001
"... In PAGE 11: ...1 (with MACE 1.4) [8, 10] are shown in Table1 . Due to the time needed to run these systems on the entire library, the results are those provided by their respective authors (in the case of leanCoP they come from a manuscript in preparation).... ..."
Cited by 3

Table 10: Familiarity with Manuscripts Department Collections by Academic Status

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2004
"... In PAGE 28: ...0% of the population of each separate status group. See Table10 below for a complete breakdown of familiarity by academic status. Table 10: Familiarity with Manuscripts Department Collections by Academic Status ... ..."

Table 9: Familiarity with Manuscript Department Collections by Academic Department Affiliation

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2004

Table 13: Use of Manuscript Department Collections by Material Type

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2004

Table [Author] Author

in Automatic integration of relational database schemas
by Ramon Lawrence, Ken Barker 2000
Cited by 1

Table 4 Increasingly automated approaches are being adopted to marking formatting during document preparation. An example of these are generalized markup schemes in which the document structure and attributes are described and subsequently associated with processing instructions. These are likely to make much of the traditional style editing task obsolete. Nevertheless the conventional techniques still apply in syntactic and substantive editing or in documents where limited and highly localised style changes are to be made to a pre-existing text.

in A Scheme for Review, Annotation and Correction of Specifications Abstract
by Anthony Finkelstein
"... In PAGE 9: ... A rule of thumb is that a maximum of 10-15% of the document may be changed after the initial proof version, any changes above this amount will probably result in considerable additional cost. Some specialist marks to denote common printers errors such as marks from visible paper edges are used, see Table4 : Q. Generally the printer will find some problems with the manuscript and will mark these on the proofs returned to author and copy-editor using, for example, mark R.... ..."

Table 4 Increasingly automated approaches are being adopted to marking formatting during document preparation. An example of these are generalized markup schemes in which the document structure and attributes are described and subsequently associated with processing instructions. These are likely to make much of the traditional style editing task obsolete. Nevertheless the conventional techniques still apply in syntactic and substantive editing or in documents where limited and highly localised style changes are to be made to a pre-existing text.

in A Scheme for Review, Annotation and Correction of Specifications
by Anthony Finkelstein
"... In PAGE 9: ... A rule of thumb is that a maximum of 10-15% of the document may be changed after the initial proof version, any changes above this amount will probably result in considerable additional cost. Some specialist marks to denote common printers errors such as marks from visible paper edges are used, see Table4 : Q. Generally the printer will find some problems with the manuscript and will mark these on the proofs returned to author and copy-editor using, for example, mark R.... ..."

Table 5. Authority score ranking for frequently cited authors. Author name Authority score Author name Authority score

in Chapter 2 MAPPING MEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH
by Shauna Eggers, Zan Huang, Hsinchun Chen, Lijun Yan, Cathy Larson, Asraa Rashid, Michael Chau, Chienting Lin
"... In PAGE 9: ... Leape at the Harvard School of Public Health, Mor Peleg at Stanford University, and Suzanne Bakken at Columbia University. Table5 ranks the authors in the combined list by their citation-based Authority scores. James Cimino is again among the five highest scoring in this table, along with Mark A.... ..."
Next 10 →
Results 11 - 20 of 4,218
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2016 The Pennsylvania State University