### Table 7 Timing appropriate for acquiring lessons learned

"... In PAGE 7: ...67 - 4). Table7 shows that respondents agreed that all of the above timing is appropriate for acquiring lessons learned. In fact, no matter when professionals discover meaningful lessons, they should record them immediately.... ..."

### Table 2 - Basis of sub-collection organization (results from survey of 1998-2002 NLG recipients)

2004

"... In PAGE 12: ... In these cases the division was based on the subject headings used; every subject heading represented a distinct sub-collection. Table2 reports the organization of sub-collections. Note that 36% of the respondents reported organizing sub-collections on the basis of two or more factors.... ..."

Cited by 1

### Table 1: Translation of levels in a MODWT to appropriate time scales for the DM-$ return series ( T = 5 minutes).

"... In PAGE 15: ...lass of wavelet lters with 8 nonzero coe cients; i.e., L = L1 = 8 in Eq (14). In Fig. 2 we plot a multiresolution analysis of the DM-$ log-squared returns, consisting of the wavelet details e Dj;t;T, for levels j = 1; : : :; 12, and wavelet smooth e S12;t;T, for the entire data set. Table1 provides conversions from levels of the MODWT to time scales for the DM- $ time series. For example, the wavelet detail e D1 is associated with changes (di erences of weighted averages) of 5 minutes while e D10 is associated with changes of approximately 2 days.... ..."

### (Table [ ((Row ( quot;Appropriate TimeSep AtCommon Point quot; (A , B))) [TRUE;TRUE;TRUE;TRUE;TRUE]); ((Row ( quot;SameOr Diverging Tracks quot; (A , B))) [TRUE;TRUE;TRUE;TRUE;TRUE]); (

1997

"... In PAGE 48: ...s Closing onlinespec.hpp gt;%comp quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; env quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; is: ( (Table [((Row (ReportedOverCommonPoint (A , B))) [TRUE;FALSE])] ) [((ept (A , B)) , ((ept (A , B)) + 10)); (((ept (A , B)) - 15) , ((ept (A , B)) + 15))]) The table is complete. Stats for quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; completeness checking: Number of cases identified: 0 Processor time: user: 0 sec; system: 0 sec ------------------------------------------------------------ gt; Fusion session over.... In PAGE 48: ...s Closing onlinespec.hpp gt;%cons quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; env quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; is: ( (Table [((Row (ReportedOverCommonPoint (A , B))) [TRUE;FALSE])] ) [((ept (A , B)) , ((ept (A , B)) + 10)); (((ept (A , B)) - 15) , ((ept (A , B)) + 15))]) No inconsistencies were found in the table. Stats for quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; consistency checking:... In PAGE 49: ...s Closing onlinespec.hpp gt;%sym quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; env quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; is: ( (Table [((Row (ReportedOverCommonPoint (A , B))) [TRUE;FALSE])] ) [((ept (A , B)) , ((ept (A , B)) + 10)); (((ept (A , B)) - 15) , ((ept (A , B)) + 15))]) Assumption: ((ept (A , B)) , ((ept (A , B)) + 10)) = ((ept (B , A)) , ((ept (B , A)) + 10)) Assumption: (((ept (A , B)) - 15) , ((ept (A , B)) + 15)) = (((ept (B , A)) - 15) , ((ept (B , A)) + 15)) The table is symmetric. Processor time: user: 0 sec; system: 0 sec ------------------------------------------------------------ gt; Fusion session over.... ..."

### (Table [ ((Row ( quot;Appropriate TimeSep AtCommon Point quot; (A , B))) [TRUE;TRUE;TRUE;TRUE;TRUE]); ((Row ( quot;SameOr Diverging Tracks quot; (A , B))) [TRUE;TRUE;TRUE;TRUE;TRUE]); (

"... In PAGE 48: ...s Closing onlinespec.hpp gt;%comp quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; env quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; is: ( (Table [((Row (ReportedOverCommonPoint (A , B))) [TRUE;FALSE])] ) [((ept (A , B)) , ((ept (A , B)) + 10)); (((ept (A , B)) - 15) , ((ept (A , B)) + 15))]) The table is complete. Stats for quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; completeness checking: Number of cases identified: 0 Processor time: user: 0 sec; system: 0 sec ------------------------------------------------------------ gt; Fusion session over.... In PAGE 48: ...s Closing onlinespec.hpp gt;%cons quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; env quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; is: ( (Table [((Row (ReportedOverCommonPoint (A , B))) [TRUE;FALSE])] ) [((ept (A , B)) , ((ept (A , B)) + 10)); (((ept (A , B)) - 15) , ((ept (A , B)) + 15))]) No inconsistencies were found in the table. Stats for quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; consistency checking:... In PAGE 49: ...s Closing onlinespec.hpp gt;%sym quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; env quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; is: ( (Table [((Row (ReportedOverCommonPoint (A , B))) [TRUE;FALSE])] ) [((ept (A , B)) , ((ept (A , B)) + 10)); (((ept (A , B)) - 15) , ((ept (A , B)) + 15))]) Assumption: ((ept (A , B)) , ((ept (A , B)) + 10)) = ((ept (B , A)) , ((ept (B , A)) + 10)) Assumption: (((ept (A , B)) - 15) , ((ept (A , B)) + 15)) = (((ept (B , A)) - 15) , ((ept (B , A)) + 15)) The table is symmetric. Processor time: user: 0 sec; system: 0 sec ------------------------------------------------------------ gt; Fusion session over.... ..."

### (Table [ ((Row ( quot;Appropriate TimeSep AtCommon Point quot; (A , B))) [TRUE;TRUE;TRUE;TRUE;TRUE]); ((Row ( quot;SameOr Diverging Tracks quot; (A , B))) [TRUE;TRUE;TRUE;TRUE;TRUE]); (

"... In PAGE 48: ...s Closing onlinespec.hpp gt;%comp quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; env quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; is: ( (Table [((Row (ReportedOverCommonPoint (A , B))) [TRUE;FALSE])] ) [((ept (A , B)) , ((ept (A , B)) + 10)); (((ept (A , B)) - 15) , ((ept (A , B)) + 15))]) The table is complete. Stats for quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; completeness checking: Number of cases identified: 0 Processor time: user: 0 sec; system: 0 sec ------------------------------------------------------------ gt; Fusion session over.... In PAGE 48: ...s Closing onlinespec.hpp gt;%cons quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; env quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; is: ( (Table [((Row (ReportedOverCommonPoint (A , B))) [TRUE;FALSE])] ) [((ept (A , B)) , ((ept (A , B)) + 10)); (((ept (A , B)) - 15) , ((ept (A , B)) + 15))]) No inconsistencies were found in the table. Stats for quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; consistency checking:... In PAGE 49: ...s Closing onlinespec.hpp gt;%sym quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; env quot;ssOppDir NoLongSepPeriod quot; is: ( (Table [((Row (ReportedOverCommonPoint (A , B))) [TRUE;FALSE])] ) [((ept (A , B)) , ((ept (A , B)) + 10)); (((ept (A , B)) - 15) , ((ept (A , B)) + 15))]) Assumption: ((ept (A , B)) , ((ept (A , B)) + 10)) = ((ept (B , A)) , ((ept (B , A)) + 10)) Assumption: (((ept (A , B)) - 15) , ((ept (A , B)) + 15)) = (((ept (B , A)) - 15) , ((ept (B , A)) + 15)) The table is symmetric. Processor time: user: 0 sec; system: 0 sec ------------------------------------------------------------ gt; Fusion session over.... ..."

### Table 1 RMA Theorem 4 A set of n periodic tasks using an appropriate real-time synchronization protoco 8i;16i6n,

2003

### Table 2: Comparison of Apriori-TFP-C execution times for a number of input sets (including time to generate FCIs where appropriate).

"... In PAGE 10: ....2.2. Timing The data presented in Table2 shows the overall execution time to run Apriori- TFP-C (with a support and confidence threshold of 2% and 40%) using: (1) the single-term data set and (2) the single-term data set further preprocessed to identify FCIs (using a range of thresholds). As can be seen there is no gain using an FCI generation threshold of 2.... In PAGE 11: ...Anecdotal evidence suggests that users of classifiers are often prepared to accept a reduction in overall classification accuracy in return for a reduction in the number of CRs to be applied. Table 3 presents details of the number of rules generated using Apriori-TFP-C using the same input sets as those presented in Table2 . From the table it can be seen that using FCI input the number of rules produced decreases when a reasonable FCI generation threshold is used.... ..."

### (Table 1). For each event, we specify its importance, as well as related constraints and preferences. We define constraints by limiting appropriate start times, durations, and room properties. For example, we may indicate that an acceptable start time for the tutorial is 1:00pm or

### Table 6 Table to determine appropriate action when RMS should not start notification Non real-time communication Identity Unknown Girlfriend Colleague

"... In PAGE 36: ... User tests must determine what preferences the users would like to indicate and what actions the RMS should undertake per default. Table6 shows an example of the preferences that a recipient might indicate for non real-time communication. Table 6 Table to determine appropriate action when RMS should not start notification Non real-time communication Identity Unknown Girlfriend Colleague ... ..."