• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 56,470
Next 10 →

Table 1:Operating system DNS resolver behavior.

in Three Practical Ways to
by Improve Your Network
"... In PAGE 2: ... Using the expression above, the extra delay added to an SSH login on our campus when the pri- mary DNS server is unavailable is 50 seconds. The behavior of DNS resolvers was tested on eight operating systems, and the results of these tests are in Table1 below.Seven of the eight systems exhibit the object impermanence behavior.... ..."

Table 4: Summary of memory system behavior.

in Evaluating the Impact of Advanced Memory Systems on Compiler-Parallelized Codes
by Evan Torrie, Chau-wen Tseng, Margaret Martonosi, Mary W. Hall
"... In PAGE 8: ... To establish this trend, we have partitioned the SUIF programs in ourstudyinto three groups, based on whether their granularity was in the top, middle, or bottom third of our suite. Their memory system behavior is summarized in Table4 . We find that SUIF applications with larger granularity have the best memory system performance, resulting in both greater speedups and higher percentage of ideal speedups achieved.... ..."

Table 5. Variation in Behavior of Operating System Services

in Using Complete Machine Simulation for Software Power Estimation: The SoftWatt Approach
by Sudhanva Gurumurthi, Anand Sivasubramaniam, Mary Jane Irwin, N. Vijaykrishnan, Mary Jane, Irwin N. Vijaykrishnan, Mahmut Kandemir, Tao Li, Lizy Kurian John 2002
"... In PAGE 6: ... As these units are not accessed, the clock power is lower as well, leading to a smaller average power. Table5 shows how much variation there actually exists between the invocations of the services across the bench- marks. The variation is measured using the coefficient of deviation and is expressed as a percentage.... ..."
Cited by 24

Table 5. Variation in Behavior of Operating System Services

in Using complete machine simulation for software power estimation: The SoftWatt approach
by Sudhanva Gurumurthi, Anand Sivasubramaniam, Mary Jane, Irwin N. Vijaykrishnan, Mahmut Kandemir, Tao Li, Lizy Kurian John 2002
"... In PAGE 6: ... As these units are not accessed, the clock power is lower as well, leading to a smaller average power. Table5 shows how much variation there actually exists between the invocations of the services across the bench- marks. The variation is measured using the coefficient of deviation and is expressed as a percentage.... ..."
Cited by 24

Table 2. System Behavioral Simulation Parameters.

in NET-AN: Multi-net three-dimensional field solver extraction tool, Users reference manual, OEA
by John A. Mcneill, Senior Member, Michael Coln, D. R. Brown, Brian Larivee 2001
"... In PAGE 20: ... Parameters were included for describing analog block nonidealities such as finite op-amp gain, offset, noise, and nonlinearity. Unles otherwise indicated, system parameters were as shown in Table2 . In [1, 2] a cyclic ... ..."
Cited by 1

Table 4: Summary of memory system behavior.

in Characterizing the Memory Behavior of Compiler-Parallelized Applications
by Evan Torrie, Margaret Martonosi, Chau-wen Tseng, Mary W. Hall 1996
Cited by 7

Table 3 Behavior Q

in Learning Hierarchical Control Structures for Multiple Tasks and Changing Environments
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 6: ... The control system expanded to incorporate the new be- havior, Q 9 as shown in Figure 3#28e#29. From the behavior sequence of Table3 and Figure 5, it is seen that behavior Q 9 quickly exploited the existing behaviors Q 5 , Q 6 and to a greater extent Q 7 and Q 8 . The performance of the hierarchical control system and its component behaviors are shown in Figure 8#28b#29.... ..."

Table 1: System Behavior with Varying Available Resources

in Resource Prediction for Admission Control of Interactive Multimedia
by Sessions Silvia Hollfelder, Silvia Hollfelder, Karl Aberer 1999
"... In PAGE 6: ... We use two metrics for our evaluation: utilization is computed from the number of requests served by the server within a history unit, and server load measures all open requests (see [HA98]). Table1 shows the average utilization u, the variance of utilization (var. of u), the average server load l, the variance in server load (var.... In PAGE 7: ...lower the resources, the worse the QoS. Table1 shows that for non-uniform clients the QoS and the utilization is lower (left side) than for uniform clients with the same available resources (right side).... In PAGE 7: ...10 for 1000 simulation periods. The values in Table1 are computed with the parameter r h . We employed the stochastic approach to evaluate situations in which the server has to deal with excessively high variations in data rates.... ..."
Cited by 4

Table 2. Example system execution behavior estimates.

in Evaluating Performance Attributes of Layered Software Architecture
by Vibhu Saujanya Sharma, Pankaj Jalote, Kishor S. Trivedi

Table 2. Example system execution behavior estimates.

in 66 Evaluating Performance Attributes of Layered Software Architecture
by Vibhu Saujanya Sharma, Pankaj Jalote, Kishor S. Trivedi
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 56,470
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University