"... In PAGE 48: ... 45 study ( Table5 ). For example, improved fallows have returns to land and labor at least double those of unfertilized maize under most tested changes, including a 500 kg decline in post-fallow maize yields, and 50 percent increases or decreases in the discount rate, and the prices of fertilizer and labor.... In PAGE 49: ... 46 In contrast, the performance of improved fallows relative to continuous, fertilized maize is sensitive to changes in key parameters ( Table5 ). Increases in maize prices (such as between 1996 and 1998) raise the returns to fertilized maize at a much faster rate than they raise the returns to improved fallows.... ..."

"... In PAGE 16: ...elational and 0-relational problems (t = 1.39, df = 717, p = 0.08). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table 1: Mean accuracy and latency data ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neuroimaging results Voxel-wise analysis RT-convolved HRF. The activation maxima from the primary analysis using RT-convolved HRF are given in Table2 and are illustrated in Fig. 4a.... In PAGE 16: ...01, but there were no PFC differences even at this level. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Figure 4: Results from voxel-wise analysis --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table2 : Maxima of regions showing significant signal changes... In PAGE 18: ...omparisons (p = 0.28, F[2,18] = 1.38). The voxel-wise analysis cluster, however, included not only BA44, but also a region outside of the PFC, BA6 (see Fig 4a and Table2 ). It is possible therefore that the effect in left BA44 was at least in part driven by differences in the premotor cortex (BA6).... In PAGE 40: ...01 uncorrected for multiple comparisons, with an extent threshold of 5 voxels. Details on individual maxima of activation for (a) are given in Table2 . Individual maxima of activation for (b) are discussed in the text (see Results).... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ...0 [19] contains a feature called the Update Impact Analyzer,which uses portions of the LiveOps technology to provide this functionality, enabling administrators to prioritize testing and migra- tion of applications and patches. Table2 presents a summary of daily changes affecting the five categories of processes observed across 34 production servers over a one month period. Surprisingly we see that each day there are several changes made that impact LOB and OS processes, and that each machine on average only receives about half (90 of 163) of the distinct global installations impact- ing OS applications.... ..."

"... In PAGE 24: ... The change in the measured polarisation was negligible, in the overall t and in each mass bin. The uncertainties, separated into their components for each invariant mass region, are listed in Table4 , showing the cancellation of some systematics. The total systematic uncertainty in the combined value of hP i was 0.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ... Let us now go further and compare the prediction with the actual changes in more detail. We use a 2x2 contingency table (see Table5 ) which first separates the classes into two groups: Predictive group and Actual group. Each group has two subgroups: Unchanged and Changed.... In PAGE 12: ... Analysis of the data shows that 13 C++ classes were changed for this reason alone. Adjusting the figures in Table5 results in a new set of figures saying more about the RDIA approach in use (Table 6). In the new table the requirement Porting to Solaris and additionals are not considered as changes.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ... There are six such comparisons for each cohort and they are evenly spaced across the survey time span. Table1 shows the years that we use for the analyses below and defines the six comparisons being made for each cohort. Monks and Pizer (1998) also use two-year employer comparisons, but they only construct four of them and do not select the same survey years from each cohort (for example, the fourth and sixth years are used as a comparison for the original cohort but not for the recent).... In PAGE 9: ... Monks and Pizer (1998) also use two-year employer comparisons, but they only construct four of them and do not select the same survey years from each cohort (for example, the fourth and sixth years are used as a comparison for the original cohort but not for the recent). [ Table1 about here ] We define a job separation as follows. For each two-year comparison, the risk set in year t is all employed respondents, not self-employed or working without pay, who are also observed in year t+2.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ... Table4 reports the changes of analysis results when points-to are calculated in a calling context sensitive way. The first data column reports the percentage of procedures that have different side effects in different calling contexts.... In PAGE 6: ... Figure 4. An example of context sensitivity The data in Table4 shows that some procedures have different side effects for heap memory references and different alias pairs at different call sites. However, the change of alias pairs is only caused by the change of the control flow and the alias patterns of procedures remain almost the same.... ..."