### Table 1. Coverage probabilities and expected lengths of nominal 95% con dence intervals for the log odds ratio, for binomial samples with n1 = n2 = 10 and parameters p1 and p2.

"... In PAGE 3: ... Tables 1 and 2 show typical results. Table1 refers to nominal 95% con dence intervals when the data result from two independent binomial samples of sizes n1 = n2 = 10 with various choices for the binomial... In PAGE 4: ...he odds ratio itself are 59.9 for the Woolf interval, 31.8 for the Gart interval, and 250.8 for the exact interval. Table1 reveals that, considering the small sample size, the logit methods behave surprisingly well for these parameter settings. Their coverage probabilities exceed the nominal con dence level.... In PAGE 4: ... With both of these logit intervals, underestimation of j log j (the true log odds ratio falling farther from 0 than the interval bounds) is much more common than overestimation, the discrepancy being somewhat larger for the Gart interval. For the 8 cases summarized in Table1 for which p1 6 = p2, for instance, the average probability of underestimation was .013 for the Woolf interval and .... ..."

### Table 2: Walsh Sums for x5

1999

Cited by 2

### Table 2: Walsh Sums for x5

1999

Cited by 2

### TABLE 1. Intracellular localization of Ad5/35 and H90045/35 virions in MO7e cells 2 h postinfectiona

2004

### Table 1: Qualitative solution behavior of full Navier-Stokes equations, in a single coordinate direction, + means solution increase, ? solution decrease.

"... In PAGE 8: ... Finally, the double root (!x)5;6 implies a solution behavior which is exactly the opposite of that of (!x)3;4. In Table1 , the solution behavior in x-direction is summarized. The minus signs de ne solution decrease and the plus signs increase.... In PAGE 8: ...n x-direction is summarized. The minus signs de ne solution decrease and the plus signs increase. Because of the similarity of equation (2.7) with respect to !x; !y and !z, for the y- and z-directions, the tables corresponding to Table1 are similar. (The tables for the y- and z-direction can be directly obtained from Table 1 by replacing x; u; (!x)1?6 by y; v; (!y)1;:::;6 and z; w; (!z)1;:::;6, respectively.... In PAGE 8: ...7) with respect to !x; !y and !z, for the y- and z-directions, the tables corresponding to Table 1 are similar. (The tables for the y- and z-direction can be directly obtained from Table1 by replacing x; u; (!x)1?6 by y; v; (!y)1;:::;6 and z; w; (!z)1;:::;6, respectively.)... In PAGE 8: ...Table 1: Qualitative solution behavior of full Navier-Stokes equations, in a single coordinate direction, + means solution increase, ? solution decrease. For each of the four possible (x; u)-cases in Table1 , three exponentially growing solution modes appear (three plus signs per column). The same holds for the y- and z-direction.... ..."

### TABLES Table 1: Comparison of reconstruction methods for simulated data: Reconstruction errors and noise sensitivity.

### Table 6. Results for 20x5FT (optimal: 1165)

"... In PAGE 3: ... 5 shows the viewer of our system for job-shop scheduling (an instance of optimum for 10 x10 FT). Moreover, Table 5 and Table6 indicate simulation results of GA [33], GA+MGA_1, GA+MGA_2, GA+MGA_3, and GA+MGA_4 for 10x10FT (optimal: 930) and 20x5FT (optimal: 1165), respectively. In Table 5 and Table 6, the proposed methods (four different strategies) can obtain better solutions than GA [33] does for 10x10FT and 20x5FT.... In PAGE 3: ... Moreover, Table 5 and Table 6 indicate simulation results of GA [33], GA+MGA_1, GA+MGA_2, GA+MGA_3, and GA+MGA_4 for 10x10FT (optimal: 930) and 20x5FT (optimal: 1165), respectively. In Table 5 and Table6 , the proposed methods (four different strategies) can obtain better solutions than GA [33] does for 10x10FT and 20x5FT. Table 7 and Table 8 depict comparisons of the best performance between our GA (PLGA; MGA_4) and some literature results [18], [19], respectively.... ..."

Cited by 1