CiteSeerX — Table search results — intervening structure

Results 1 - 10 of 19,538

Table 3: Separation values (equivalent number of words) accorded to intervening document features. A sample of documents was read to make a list of SGML tags which indicate no greater semantic or structural barrier than a sentence break. Twelve such marker pairs were identi ed. They are the so- called lightweight tags. All other SGML tags were assumed to be heavyweight.

by David Hawking, Paul Thistlewaite, Peter Bailey 1996

Cited by 8

Table 1 Associations of Input Variables to Intervening to Output

in Deliberate Insight in Team Creativity

by Christopher Barlow Stuart 1998

"... In PAGE 9: ... Time to develop and improve the ideas 4. Time spent planning how to get ideas accepted and implemented Table1 reflects the strength of relationship among these elements, along the linkage from input to intervening to output. The direct linkages from input to output did not show equivalent strength and significance.... ..."

Cited by 4

Table 1 Associations of Input Variables to Intervening to Output

in In final editing for Journal of Creative Behavior

by Christopher Barlow Roosevelt, Christopher M. Barlow 1998

Cited by 4

Table 2. Comparison of best generated structures with native structures

in from secondary structure elements

by Downloaded From, K Yue, Ka Dill, Email Alerting, Kaizhi Yue, Ken A. Dill 2000

"... In PAGE 7: ... Results and discussion The efficiency enhancements due to pruning In this section, we show tests of the G2 algorithm. For the five proteins shown in Table2 , having chain lengths from 68 to 118 residues long, we took the known native secondary structure ele- ments as given. G2 then follows the procedures described above: it attempts to assemble all the secondary structures, adjusts the side chains, and inserts and finds appropriate conformations for the intervening loops.... In PAGE 7: ... The slow computational step is loop reattachment, which solves a set of equations numerically, for each such set. Table2 compares the best G2 structures with the native struc- tures from the PDB. The structures are generated by a systematic Fig.... ..."

Table 5 Conversion of the hydrogen bonding arrangements between the peptide and water in a particular structure (N) and in the slrcceeding structure (X + I)

in J. Mol. (1992) 223. 1121-1138 Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Helix Denaturation

by Valerie Daggett And, Valerie Daggett, Michael Levitt 1992

"... In PAGE 13: ... 12). The change in a parti amp;lar hydrogen bonding arrangement from one structure to the next along the trajectory is given for tlwo temperatures in Table5 . The number of times the conversions occurred is obtained by moving along a row.... In PAGE 14: ...here was a direct swap of hydrogen bonds (e.g. FB + BF and BF + FB). The average amount of time between FB+BF proceeding through either FF or BB is also given in Table5 , along with the times for reversion to FB. The average times for passing through states with both hvdrogen bonds intact was l-0 picosecond and the conversion wa#s faster for intervening structures with both hvdrogene bonds broken, O-4 picosecond.... In PAGE 14: ...arbonyl and amide groups (BR) (Fig. 12). This process (FF +TS+BR) occurred only once during the simulations, at 423 K. The number of cases of FF + TS was low at all temperatures ( Table5 ). The number of bridging water molecules increased with increasing temperature (from 0 at 278 K to 221 at 473 K), or unfolding of the helix.... ..."

Cited by 3

Table 2. Factors Model: Contextual and Intervening Factors (Unit of Measures is

in Negotiation, the Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce,

by Jerry Fjermestad, Starr, Roxanne Hiltz

"... In PAGE 3: ... What Has Been Studied: Contextual Factors Table 1 shows the counts for the technology subfactor. Table2 highlights the counts for group and context subfactors of the contextual factors and the intervening subfactors. Technology Communication Mode Group Support Systems have been classified into three primary types (Table 1): DSS (Decision Support Systems) GSS, or CMC (Computer-Mediated Communication).... ..."

Table 3: The rst ve instances for the sentence in Figure 2. Features 1{3 are the features for distance and intervening VPs and commas. Features 4 and 5 show the verb and its POS. Features 6{8, 9{11 and 17{19 describe the context words/chunks, Features 12{16 the focus chunk. Empty contexts are indicated by the \- quot; for all features.

in Cascaded Grammatical Relation Assignment

by Sabine Buchholz, Jorn Veenstra, Walter Daelemans 1999

"... In PAGE 6: ... This is the case between the adverbial functions nder and the relations nder. The former adds an extra informa- tive feature to the instances of the latter (Feature 16 in Table3 ). Cf.... In PAGE 6: ... All three e ects interact in the cascade we describe. The PP chunker reduces the number of decisions for the relations nder (instead of one instance for the preposition and one for the NP chunk, we get only one instance for the PP chunk), introduces an extra feature (Feature 12 in Table3 ), and changes the context (instead of a preposition and an NP, context may now be one PP). As we already noted above, precision and re- call are monotonically increasing when adding more structure.... ..."

Cited by 60

Table 3: The rst ve instances for the sentence in Figure 2. Features 1{3 are the features for distance and intervening VPs and commas. Features 4 and 5 show the verb and its POS. Features 6{8, 9{11 and 17{19 describe the context words/chunks, Features 12{16 the focus chunk. Empty contexts are indicated by the \- quot; for all features.

in Cascaded Grammatical Relation Assignment

by Sabine Buchholz, Jorn Veenstra , Walter Daelemans 1999

Cited by 60

TABLE IV. Geometriesb of Azidoazomethine and 1H-Tetrazole, and Intervening Saddle Point.

in Searching for saddle points of potential energy surfaces by following a reduced gradient

by Wolfgang Quapp, Michael Hirsch, Olaf Imig, Dietmar Heidrich 1998

Cited by 3

Table 1 lists the studies falling into each of these categories, examples of interven- tions, and the distribution of study designs for each category.

in unknown title

by unknown authors

Results 1 - 10 of 19,538

Tools

Table 1 Associations of Input Variables to Intervening to Output

Table 1 Associations of Input Variables to Intervening to Output

Table 2. Comparison of best generated structures with native structures

Table 5 Conversion of the hydrogen bonding arrangements between the peptide and water in a particular structure (N) and in the slrcceeding structure (X + I)

Table 2. Factors Model: Contextual and Intervening Factors (Unit of Measures is

TABLE IV. Geometriesb of Azidoazomethine and 1H-Tetrazole, and Intervening Saddle Point.

Table 1 lists the studies falling into each of these categories, examples of interven- tions, and the distribution of study designs for each category.