"... In PAGE 7: ... Because of the sensitive difference between the terms field and discipline in later parts of this paper (see the section on Classification for Contributing Disciplines), starting from this point, we use discipline to represent MIS as we have discussed it so far, and sub-discipline for the HCI research we are assessing. Table1 sumarizes these general and specific questions. We start the specific questions within the first dimension with What are the contexts of studies? as this is one major distinction between HCI studies in MIS and HCI studies with a more technical orientation.... In PAGE 19: ...00 Analyses and Results This section presents analyses and results. We organize the presentation around the research questions (see Table1 ). Within each of the five general research questions, we present the answers to the specific questions.... In PAGE 25: ...2.12 Focus group 1 1 1 1 4 Total 5 30 30 5 23 39 7 18 14 40 26 95 13 5 21 1 27 680 RQ16: What are the levels of analysis? As shown in Table1 5, 304 studies (or 90%) were conducted at the individual level only, 15 at the group level only, and 6 at both individual and group levels. As shown in the last column, the majority of papers (93.... In PAGE 27: ... Journal of the Asociation for Information Systems Vol. 6 No. 1, p.27-292/November 205 253 Because a large number of studies did not specify a technology/service, we included this information to gain more insight. It is shown as Blank in Table1 7, which indicates that the frequency for topics with no technology/service (which is 127) was the highest compared to other studies with any type of technology/service. Table 17.... In PAGE 27: ... Overall, 22% of the articles did not specify any technology/service. This co-relates with Table1 6, which shows that about 21.7% of articles did not cover a particular technology/service.... In PAGE 28: ... These papers constituted more than 85% of the 337 papers. From the total number of papers perspective (last column of Table1 9), 19 papers (8%) considered personality, 27 (9.2%) considered demographics, and eight papers considered both.... In PAGE 40: ...umber (1.3) of methods per paper compared to 1.1 in the other six journals. Since only 39 papers used multiple methods (see Table1 3), the number is too small to conduct a supplemental analysis similar to that of multiple topics in order to look for trends in recent years. Finally, readers are cautioned against over-generalizing these results due to the relatively small number of studies within some journals and the policy changes enacted by journals.... In PAGE 49: ... This should be done consciously both within the MIS discipline and between MIS and other design-oriented disciplines such as Computer Science, Engineering, and Design. Within the MIS discipline and the HCI sub- discipline, we have seen less interest in the design side of the interaction box in Figure 1 (Refer to the analysis results for RQ12, Table1 0). This can become a concern because theoretical understandings that do not feed design can eventually lose their relevance.... ..."

"... In PAGE 16: ...Data, Samples and Estimation Issues Data and Samples Data on the variables discussed above were collected from several different sources (see Appendix 3). The maximum sample size was 32 countries (listed in Table1 ). The major constraining factor for the sample period was the short series for R amp;D investment, which was available only from 1981 to 1990 for a respectable number of countries.... In PAGE 18: ...ogs. All variables are stationary. Estimation yields feasible GLS estimates of the model parameters, which are discussed below. Estimation Results In Table1 we categorize the list of countries in our data set into five groups, based on the average strengths of intellectual property protection obtaining in these countries over the period 1981-1990. We also note the share of GNP that they devote to R amp;D15.... ..."

"... In PAGE 31: ... SCM tools and other optimization tools reside in the third quadrant. Based on the ERP evolution map, a contribution factor matrix is developed in Table6 . It is not possible to map every detailed functionality or enabling characteristics provided by a specific ERP package.... In PAGE 82: ...01) is better in the merchandising department than the sales (distribution) department (see Table 6). Table6 : Utilization Level of POS System by User Department User department Levels Utilization levels of POS system Merchand izing Sales t-value Check on over-stocked and out-of stock items 4.68 4.... In PAGE 95: ...3% 239,647 +74% 282,103 +17.7% Table6 : Commercial Vehicle Population Country 1997 Market Growth (%) 1998 Market Growth (%) 1999 Market Growth (%) 2000 Market Growth (%) Thailand (RHD) 231,096 -44.5% 97,765 -57.... In PAGE 113: ... In contrast, remarkable growth rates of export earnings were posted for concentrates, preserves, and other edible parts, while modest growth were achieved in frozen, dried and juice. The export values of all mango product forms posted declining growth rates in major traditional markets such as Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States ( Table6 ). Table 6: Mango Exports: All Products, Value by Country, 1996-2000 Country Growth Rate (%) % Share TOTAL (3.... In PAGE 113: ... The export values of all mango product forms posted declining growth rates in major traditional markets such as Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States (Table 6). Table6 : Mango Exports: All Products, Value by Country, 1996-2000 Country Growth Rate (%) % Share TOTAL (3.32) 100.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ...While intellectual capabilities such as teamwork, time management, report writing, analysing and evaluating information are addressed in the integrated core papers, IT skills are addressed through the six professional papers within the IT Major, the cooperative education ex- perience and the wide range of tools and IT applications addressed throughout the pro- gramme(Dougherty et al., 2003); (see Table1 ). Students who graduate with the IT Major qualify for business-oriented careers, which may involve a considerable IT dimension (Clear, 2001).... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ... It is unclear whether to change the process in some way or whether to specify and purchase higher quality stock material. The variables with the largest contribution to end-of-line variation are listed with their percentage contributions in Table3 . Note that the table lists the percentage contribution of input variation to final quality characteristic variation.... In PAGE 5: ... Table3 now allows for direct comparison of the impact of design and manufacturing variables on product quality. The table shows that the most significant contributors to strain variation are process variables: aging time during heat treatment and forming force during stretch forming.... ..."