Tools
Sorted by:
Try your query at:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Results 1 - 10
of
2,555
Table 27: How CS/IT students say they are assessed and how teachers say they evaluate their students
2004
Table 2 Training procedure for test sets
"... In PAGE 11: ... However, in designing set C we made the body shape information maximally diagnostic (that is, each Greeble has a different body shape) while in set D all Greebles shared exactly the same body shape. The procedure for teaching participants names for test sets involved the same tasks as were used in expert- training sessions, and is summarized in Table2 . Note that all participants performed the naming test at least three times on each set of test Greebles, but if a perfect score was not obtained on the third test, the participant was required to repeat the naming with feedback and naming tasks until this criterion was met (or until they had completed 13 naming tasks).... ..."
Table 2. Performance of English system with perfect mentions and perfect relations
2005
Cited by 7
Table 3. Kernel families recognized by XARK in Perfect. perfect
Table 4 Value-added and hired labor multipliers for Kutus region, Kenya, 1988 (source: Lewis and Thorbecke, 1992)a
"... In PAGE 13: ... High education town households ben- efit most from production increases in all sectors of the economy. In terms of hired labor employment, the service sector, followed by farm-based non-farm and manufacturing production, has the strongest employment generating impact ( Table4 , columns 3 and 4). Although our focus is on developing country economies, lessons can be drawn from analyses of the US rural economy.... ..."
Table 3.: Selected structures by the perfect
Tablel: Dependence results for the Perfect Benchmarks
Results 1 - 10
of
2,555
