Results 1 - 10 of 8,309

Table 2. Typical crest factor values of multisine excitation signals

in unknown title
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 5: ...phase signal is modified by the algorithms (see the histograms in Fig 2). Table2 contains typical crest factor values of the Schroeder multisine, random-phase multisine, and the output of crest-factor minimization algorithms in [2] and [3] starting from Schroeder and random initial phases. It is clear, that the optimization methods give very good results when the initial state is a random phase multisine, and moreover, the gained signal is robust against misuse.... In PAGE 5: ... Table 3 shows typical running times for the optimization algorithms with typical settings, on a Pentium-class PC, in MATLAB environment. From the results in Table2 and Table 3 it is clear that Algorithm [3] gives better crest factor values and is faster than Algorithm [2] when the number of excited lines is low. For very high number of frequency lines only Algorithm [2] can be used.... ..."

Table 2.2: Excitation signals. From [34]

in Tutor: Xavier Serra
by Alfonso Antonio, Pérez Carrillo 2006

TABLE I STEADY-STATE EVALUATION OF THE MULTIPLE SOURCELOCALIZATION SCHEMEFOR EXCITATION SIGNALS WITH VARYING SPECTRALSUPPORTS

in Improved Wideband Blind Adaptive System Identification Using Decorrelation Filters for the Localization of Multiple Speakers
by Anthony Lombard, Herbert Buchner, Walter Kellermann

TABLE I Bode diagram parameters for 3R robot and a doublet-like exciting signal

in Fractional calculus
by unknown authors

TABLE II Bode diagram parameters for the 3R robot and a white noise exciting signal distributed throughout the 500-cycle trajectories

in Fractional calculus
by unknown authors

Table 2. Very Low M Selections The selections for the very low mass di erence chargino signal are designed to reject the background, mostly ! hadrons and ! + ?. In both 4J and 2JL selections, variables similar to those used for the other chargino analyses are employed, such as the missing transverse momentum, the transverse imbalance and the transverse acoplanarity. No energy should be detected at low angle. In the spirit of Section 3.2, energy-based variables are

in Searches for Charginos and Neutralinos in e
by Gamma Collisions
"... In PAGE 14: ...neutral hadrons are removed with FNH and P NH T , as can be seen in Table2 . As the main potential background in the 2JL-VL selection comes from events with a misidenti ed hadron, cuts to identify leptons are tighter than in the other 2JL analyses and also use the dE=dx information from the TPC to identify signal electrons which typically have lower momentum than those targeted by the L, H, and VH selections.... In PAGE 15: ... M range VH - 161 GeV VH - 172 GeV H L anti- cuts Yes Nch 24 26 PT gt; 15 GeV/c gt; 10 GeV/c PT =Evis gt; 12:5% gt; 10% Mvis lt; 160 GeV=c2 lt; 70 GeV=c2 lt; 60 GeV=c2 lt; 165 lt; 175 InvB gt; 0:4 gt; 0:3 gt; 0:25 E30 w lt; 10%ps lt; 8%ps E` lt; 10 GeV lt; 15 GeV lt; 20 GeV Mmiss lt; 60 GeV=c2 lt; 70 GeV=c2 gt; 100 GeV=c2 MW gt; M1 or 23 gt; ref M1 = 90 GeV=c2 ref = 140 ref = 80 Thrust lt; 0:85 lt; 0:925 Isolated =0 Chargino - 2JL M range VH - 161 GeV VH - 172 GeV H L anti- cuts Yes Nch 7 E` gt; 12:5 GeV 2 [10; 40] GeV gt; 2:5%ps lt; 20 GeV E30 ` lt; Eref ` and E30 w lt; Eref w Yes Yes if E30 ` gt; 0 No (Eref ` ; Eref w ) ) (5%; 20%)ps (2:5%; 20%)ps (20%; 4%)ps Mmiss gt; 50 GeV=c2 gt; 55 GeV=c2 gt; 50 GeV=c2 gt; 120 GeV=c2 Whad lt; 70 GeV=c2 lt; 65 GeV=c2 2 [5; 45] GeV=c2 gt; 1:5 GeV=c2 Thrust lt; 0:95 T lt; 170 ( lt; 150 if Nch 4) Isolated = 0 Chargino - VL Topology 4J 2JL Mvis gt; 4 GeV=c2 and trigger conditions Mmiss gt; 140 GeV=c2 E30 w ; E12 = 0 GeV point gt; 10 j cos missj lt; 0:8 Nch 4 3 PT gt; max(2:5%ps; 40%Evis) gt; 25%Evis T lt; 125 lt; 160 , lt; 150 if Nch = 4 lt; 110 if Nch = 3 and j cos missj gt; 0:7 Thrust lt; 0:95 0:9 FNH = 0 or PNH T gt; 2%ps lt; 0:4 identi ed e= 1 E30 ` lt; 5 GeV scat gt; 2 if Plepton T lt; 2 GeV=c Whad lt; 10 GeV=c2 Table2 : Cut values for the chargino analyses. The VH selections are divided into cuts used at ps= 161 GeV and 172 GeV.... ..."

Table 3. The Fourier normalized component of the Fourier analysis for two models (f = 457 kHz, the input excitation at small signal, i.e. VA = 1V).

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2004

Table 4. The Fourier normalized component of the Fourier analysis for two models (f = 457 kHz, the input excitation at large signal, i.e. VA = 20 V).

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2004

Table 5. The Fourier normalized component of the Fourier analysis for two models (f = 200 kHz and the input excitation at small signal, i.e. VA = 1V).

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2004

Table 6. The Fourier normalized component of the Fourier analysis for two models (f = 200 kHz and the input excitation at large signal, i.e. VA = 20 V).

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2004
Results 1 - 10 of 8,309