"... In PAGE 19: ...ye. All subjects had a Snellen acuity above 6/9.3. Mean thresholds for the two groups are presented in Table8 .... In PAGE 19: ...resented in Table 8. None of the variables showed a significant group effect (all p values gt;.20). Table8 here In coherent motion detection, it appears that our subjects had much higher thresholds than in comparable published studies (e.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... We focus here on visual perception, but have considered a similar parameter set for aural percep- tion. Table2 shows a number of parameters associated with visual perception. Small changes in these parameters can be significant.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... We focus here on visual perception, but have considered a similar parameter set for aural percep- tion. Table2 shows a number of parameters associated with visual perception. Small changes in these parameters can be significant.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... We focus here on visual perception, but have considered a similar parameter set for aural percep- tion. Table2 shows a number of parameters associated with visual perception. Small changes in these parameters can be significant.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ...In Table2 , we show the correlation of the visual distances from 3-D and 6-D MDS to the physical measures from either the markers on the lips, cheeks, or chin. The last column shows correlations with all three physical measures.... ..."

"... In PAGE 11: ... Recentphysiological findings(Lee etal., 2002)directly the anatomical associations puts many sets of seem- ingly conflicting data in a single coherent framework, as support the high-level site of feature search and top- down reentrant aspect of later involvement of low-level illustrated in Table1 . Thus, early spread attention re- flects the large receptive fields found in high-level areas, areas.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ...entral disc to a neutral disc. This design controls better for the non{additive e ects of the Ebbinghaus illusion. ipants blindly drew a line to match the length of the shaft of the M uller{Lyer gure and in the other task they indicated the length of the shaft using their index nger and thumb (cf. Table2 ). Both perceptual measures are not well established and therefore it seems bene cial to compare the motor illusion to a classical perceptual measure.... In PAGE 18: ... In the following we will relate our ndings to the results of the previous studies. Relating to previous studies Table2 sum- marizes the results of all studies performed on the in uences of visual illusions on grasping. It seems clear from these data that visual illusions do in- uence grasping.... In PAGE 19: ... In the studies of Aglioti et al. (1995) and of Haf- fenden and Goodale (1998) on the Ebbinghaus il- lusion the comparison{object itself was in uenced by the illusion during the comparison (indicated in the last column of Table2 ). We showed that the Ebbinghaus illusion behaves in a non{additive way and that this can lead to enlarged percep- tual e ects in this design (see Figure 1 and Franz et al.... In PAGE 19: ... In conclusion we do not see evidence in the stan- dard perceptual measures to advocate the weak Separate Representation Model: The better the perceptual task and the motor task are matched, the less is there a di erence between the percep- tual illusion and the motor illusion. Two of the studies in Table2 used di erent, non{standard perceptual measures to assess the perceptual e ects of the illusion. Ha enden and Goodale (1998) used a manual estimation task.... In PAGE 20: ... And, nally, the slope of the function relating these measures to physical size of the object should be known in order to validly compare them to grasping as well as to standard perceptual mea- sures (this is just the same situation as we de- scribed for the comparison of grasping with stan- dard perceptual measures in the Introduction). Second, Table2 shows that the non{standard perceptual measures yield diverging results. Espe- cially the manual estimations tasks (indicated by a and c) tend to show very large illusion e ects.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... The results can be understood as reflecting a weighted summation of sensory cues for features such as openness and roundedness, whereby the weight attached reflects the feature- specific reliability of the information received by each sensory modality (cf. Table3 ). The between-perceiver variation then reflects differences in the estimation of this reliability.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... The results can be understood as reflecting a weighted summation of sensory cues for features such as openness and roundedness, whereby the weight attached reflects the feature- specific reliability of the information received by each sensory modality (cf. Table3 ). The between-perceiver variation then reflects differences in the estimation of this reliability.... ..."