Results 1 - 10
of
10,320
Table 1. Statistical analysis of the results with reference to tonal productions (see text).
"... In PAGE 1: ... Results The results are presented in Figures and Tables in the following sections. The figures and the temporal data in Table 2 are based on linear data whereas Table1 is based on logarithmic... In PAGE 4: ... Table1 . Statistical analysis of the results with reference to temporal productions (see text).... In PAGE 4: ... Discussion Language, gender and focus tonal productions were found significant for (utterance) tonal onset and word peak f0 but hardly for (utterance) tonal offset (gender productions are however significant). Significant interactions were also found, most importantly between language and speaker gender as well as language and focus with reference to word peak f0 (see Table1 ). Temporal productions were also found significant as a function of language, gender and focus whereas significant interactions were mostly evident with reference to vowel segment productions (see Table 2).... ..."
Table 13: Measured geometrical and filamented betatron and dispersion blow-up.
"... In PAGE 15: ... Simultaneous Twiss parameter and dispersion matching was performed based on the Twiss parameters simulated with MAD and the measured dispersion and dispersion derivative as initial conditions. A measurement performed afterwards has evidenced an im- portant reduction of the blow-up though dispersion mismatch in the horizontal plane is still a major concern (see Table13 ). The study will continue during the 1999 run.... ..."
Table 1: Measured filamented betatron and dispersion blow-up factors for old and new optics
Table 1: Measured filamented betatron and dispersion blow-up factors for old and new optics
Table 2. The effect of a small uniform increase in the duration of the whole preceding context (the quot;head quot;) and/or the whole following context (the quot;tail quot;), expressed as a percentage of the effect of the same increase in the duration of the segment in focus (bold).
"... In PAGE 2: ... Based on the inverse of the cumulative normal distribution function, the effect of a small increase in duration was calculated for the segment in focus [a] in [saki] and [t] in [satu] as well as for its preceding and following context (head and tail) where this had been varied in duration. In Table2 , the effects of small increases in head and tail duration are expressed as a percentage of the effect of an equal increase in the duration of the segment in focus. Figure 1.... In PAGE 2: ...f stimulus presentation. Increasing duration: solid lines, decreasing duration: dashed lines. Discussion If the perception of quantity distinctions were based on the duration ratios of the syllables involved, then a lengthening of an initial consonant should have the same effect as an equal lengthening of the vowel. We would have a value of +100 for the [s] of saagi and we would expect positive values everywhere in the two quot;head quot; columns of Table2 . It has been observed before that an initial consonant does not actually have this effect.... In PAGE 3: ... When we try to apply these hypotheses to intervocalic consonants as in satu, we encounter difficulties since the syllable boundary can not be objectively located with any greater precision than quot;somewhere within the [t] quot;. If the perception of quantity distinctions is based on segment durations measured by a clock that runs in pace with the local speech rate, we should expect negative values everywhere in Table2 , and this is, without exception, what we observe. If we accept this hypothesis, the present data allow us to say something about the domain of speech rate perception.... ..."
Table 1: Allele locations for information encoding Following Lenski et al.[10], we sought to evolve simple functions to be used as building blocks for more complex features. While Lenski focused on Boolean expressions derived from evolved instructions, we focused on biochemical reactions. Unlike Lenski we complemented his mutational approach with a uniform crossover mechanism.
Table 1: Workloads Focus
1997
"... In PAGE 5: ... Four of the traces used were generated from unstructured technical codes, and four were from commercially oriented workloads. Table1 provides a brief summary of all eight. More information on the benchmarks can be found in [11].... ..."
Cited by 208
Table 1: Workloads Focus
1997
"... In PAGE 5: ... Four of the traces used were generated from unstructured technical codes, and four were from commercially oriented workloads. Table1 provides a brief summary of all eight. More information on the benchmarks can be found in [10] and the appendix.... ..."
Cited by 208
Table 1: Physical apertures (gaps) and the linear acceptance of the various spoilers in the BDS. ESPOI = energy spoiler, XYSPOI = betatron spoilers (CDS), COLX(Y) = CCS spoil- ers.
Table 5: Focus Approaches
"... In PAGE 46: ... After choosing the focus, I select the focus attributes that can best guide my role engineering decisions. Table5 suggests how to define the attributes. ... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
10,320