"... In PAGE 16: ... Much of the emphasis will be on the choice of bandwidth and the new aspects brought in by using local polynomial approximation. A power experiment on a wide class of nonlinear models listed in Table2 has been conducted in Section 6.3.... In PAGE 18: ...Table2 , however, where M1(x) is approximately quadratic (see Figure 1), as can be expected the best result is achieved with T = 2 and h = 1. For the ^ L(V1)-tests the size tends to be too low.... In PAGE 18: ... If no corrections are made for this e ect, it will lead to conservative tests. Figure 5 shows the power of the ^ L(V )-tests for model la) of Table2 , and we see the same general trend as for the ^ L(M)-tests; the optimal h increases with T and the derivative. Here ^ L1(V1) also has some power for h = 1 because the variance is constant, not only linear, under the null hypothesis.... In PAGE 18: ... Here ^ L1(V1) also has some power for h = 1 because the variance is constant, not only linear, under the null hypothesis. ^ L0(V1) is much more robust than ^ L0(M1), and this is the case for the other models listed in Table2 as well. 6.... In PAGE 18: ... In particular when we have a nonlinear model, we do of course not want h = 1 to be chosen when T = 0 or T = 1, but with a small autocorrelation, this may well happen for T = 0. In fact h = 1 was chosen in 136 of 500 realizations of model lc) of Table2 which is clearly nonlinear (cf. Figure 1).... In PAGE 19: ... 6.3 A power experiment for a wide set of models We have performed a power experiment for the models listed in Table2 , where t N(0; 0:62) in model ld) - lf), t N(0; 0:72) in lg) - lj) and t N(0; 1) in the other models. Models la) - lj), aa) - ag) and Aa) - Ag) are discussed in Luukkonen et al.... In PAGE 36: ...Figure 1-2: Plots of ^ M1(x) (Figure 1) and ^ V1(e) (Figure 2) for the models listed in Table2 with n = 100 000. The kernel estimator with bandwidth h = 0:2 is used and each plot consists of two realizations.... In PAGE 36: ... The possible values for h is given at the vertical axes. Figure 7: The gure is based on 500 realizations of the models in Table2 . It shows the power of ^ LT (M1) with h cross-validated and n = 100, 250 and 204 for models la) - li), aa) - ag) and Aa) - Ag), respectively.... In PAGE 36: ...ower achieved in Hjellvik and Tj stheim (1995). The nominal size is 0.05. Figure 8: The gure is based on 500 realizations of the models in Table2 and shows the power of ^ LT (V1) with h cross-validated and n = 100, 250 and 204 for models la), aa) - ag) and Aa) - Ag), respectively.... In PAGE 37: ....05 for the standard normal distribution has been used. The model is Xt = t, the bandwidth is h = n?1=9 and the number of realizations are 500. Table2 : Various nonlinear models. Models la) - lj), aa) - ag) and Aa) - Ag) are discussed in Luukkonen et al.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ... We thus obtain eight different methods that correspond to all possible combinations of three concepts above: the first one is the linear preprocessing (PCA or PLS), the second one is the optional whitening and the last part is the nonlinear model (RBFN or LS-SVM). Methods are sum- marized in Table1 (see also Fig. 4).... ..."

"... In PAGE 14: ...Opening, Orientation, and Consolidation, culminating in a summary of the whole model. The final list of contextual interactions appears in Table 3, and a list of the core processes appears in Table4 . [Insert Figure 1, Table 3, and Table 4 here] External Context Information behaviour is not isolated from the context within which the information seeker works.... In PAGE 14: ... The final list of contextual interactions appears in Table 3, and a list of the core processes appears in Table 4. [Insert Figure 1, Table 3, and Table4 here] External Context Information behaviour is not isolated from the context within which the information seeker works. Major external influences were categorised as Social and Organisational, Time, The Project, Navigation Issues and Access to Sources.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ... In order to have easy interpretable models, we have fixed the maximal number of terms in the equation to be equal to 8 and the maximum degree of polynoms to be equal to 3. The calculations performed using the select params option of the ANALYSIS are summarized in Table1 . The number of stored models was 3.... In PAGE 9: ... It was shown that the use of significant variables, as detected by MUSEUM, = improved PLS results (compare data in column 7 vs. column 6 in Table1 ). The similar tendency was also observed if only variables found to be relevant by the PNN algorithm were used in the cross-validation calculations (compare the last and 7 columns of Table 1).... In PAGE 12: ... b Number of significant PLS components. c The cross-validated q2 calculated using input variables optimized by MUSEUM approach (unless not stated otherwise the PLS results are from Table1 and 15 of (2)). d Number of input variables selected by PNN.... ..."

"... In PAGE 28: ...Draft as of: 01/17/99 Page 28 of 34 Table6 : Parsimonious Models (GMDH) High School Model Adjusted R 2 = .638 Elementary School Model Adjusted R 2 = .... ..."

"... In PAGE 28: ...Draft as of: 01/17/99 Page 28 of 34 Table6 : Parsimonious Models (GMDH) High School Model Adjusted R 2 = .638 Elementary School Model Adjusted R 2 = .... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ... For the Newton iterations, convergenceis reached if the difference between the two lat- est solutions, divided by the latest solution, is smaller than BDBC A0BK . Table4 and Figure 7 show the measurements for running one time step of the nonlinear simulation. Since the dis- cretization of the entire spatial domain requires more than 512MB, measurement associated with a single processor of the Linux cluster is not available.... In PAGE 6: ... Although this is not a problem for the Origin 2000 machine, which has a shared memory of 24GB, we have used the CPU-time obtained on two processors as the reference for calculating speedup re- sults for both the machine types. In this way Table4 brings a fair comparison. We remark that the relatively poorer speedup results of Table 4, when compared with those of the linear simula- tions, are primarily due to the general mesh partition ap-... In PAGE 6: ... In this way Table 4 brings a fair comparison. We remark that the relatively poorer speedup results of Table4 , when compared with those of the linear simula- tions, are primarily due to the general mesh partition ap-... ..."

"... In PAGE 17: ... Turning to the model of income dynamics, Table 2 gives our estimates of equation (4) without the trend (suppressing the constant term in 4).7 Table3 gives the results including the 7 The sample mean annual income is Yuan 446 per capita at 1985 prices (with a standard deviation of 264), while the corresponding mean for expenditure is Yuan 345 (standard deviation of 166).... ..."