"... In PAGE 64: ... This precaution was taken so that the results would not get skewed, as different routing table generate different levels of contention, cell loss, etc, within a switching element. Input Port Input VPI Output Port Output VPI Cumulative Load Individual load Priority 1 1 1 2 6 6 High 1 2 2 3 10 4 High 2 3 2 4 6 6 High 2 4 1 5 10 4 High Table4... In PAGE 66: ...Input Port Input VPI Output Port Output VPI Cumulative Load Individual load Priority 6 41 6 42 3 3 High 6 42 1 43 4 1 High 6 43 2 44 5 1 High 6 44 3 45 6 1 High 6 45 4 46 7 1 High 6 46 5 47 8 1 High 6 47 7 48 9 1 High 6 48 8 49 10 1 High 7 49 7 50 3 3 High 7 50 1 51 4 1 High 7 51 2 52 5 1 High 7 52 3 53 6 1 High 7 53 4 54 7 1 High 7 54 5 55 8 1 High 7 55 6 56 9 1 High 7 56 8 57 10 1 High 8 57 8 58 3 3 High 8 58 1 59 4 1 High 8 59 2 60 5 1 High 8 60 3 61 6 1 High 8 61 4 62 7 1 High 8 62 5 63 8 1 High 8 63 6 64 9 1 High 8 64 7 65 10 1 High Table4... In PAGE 73: ... It is further assumed that the queue memory can be accessed in parallel. Table4 -3 shows a theoretical analysis of the three queuing schemes. In this example, the cell size is 53 bytes, the memory width W is... In PAGE 74: ...7 ns 6.7 ns Table4 -3: Required memory access times for the three queuing schemes 4.8.... ..."

"... In PAGE 64: ... This precaution was taken so that the results would not get skewed, as different routing table generate different levels of contention, cell loss, etc, within a switching element. Input Port Input VPI Output Port Output VPI Cumulative Load Individual load Priority 1 1 1 2 6 6 High 1 2 2 3 10 4 High 2 3 2 4 6 6 High 2 4 1 5 10 4 High Table4... In PAGE 65: ...Input Port Input VPI Output Port Output VPI Cumulative Load Individual load Priority 1 1 1 2 3 3 High 1 2 2 3 4 1 High 1 3 3 4 5 1 High 1 4 4 5 6 1 High 1 5 5 6 7 1 High 1 6 6 7 8 1 High 1 7 7 8 9 1 High 1 8 8 9 10 1 High 2 9 2 10 3 3 High 2 10 1 11 4 1 High 2 11 3 12 5 1 High 2 12 4 13 6 1 High 2 13 5 14 7 1 High 2 14 6 15 8 1 High 2 15 7 16 9 1 High 2 16 8 17 10 1 High 3 17 3 18 3 3 High 3 18 1 19 4 1 High 3 19 2 20 5 1 High 3 20 4 21 6 1 High 3 21 5 22 7 1 High 3 22 6 23 8 1 High 3 23 7 24 9 1 High 3 24 8 25 10 1 High 4 25 4 26 3 3 High 4 26 1 27 4 1 High 4 27 2 28 5 1 High 4 28 3 29 6 1 High 4 29 5 30 7 1 High 4 30 6 31 8 1 High 4 31 7 32 9 1 High 4 32 8 33 10 1 High 5 33 5 34 3 3 High 5 34 1 35 4 1 High 5 35 2 36 5 1 High 5 36 3 37 6 1 High 5 37 4 38 7 1 High 5 38 6 39 8 1 High 5 39 7 40 9 1 High 5 40 8 41 10 1 High Table4... In PAGE 73: ... It is further assumed that the queue memory can be accessed in parallel. Table4 -3 shows a theoretical analysis of the three queuing schemes. In this example, the cell size is 53 bytes, the memory width W is... In PAGE 74: ...7 ns 6.7 ns Table4 -3: Required memory access times for the three queuing schemes 4.8.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... For this purpose, the CG benchmark was chosen because it provides a significant load to the interconnection network. Table2 presents the comparison of the real runtimes and the simulated runtimes of the hub that were obtained using the switch trace file. Figure 2 graphically depicts this comparison.... ..."

"... In PAGE 12: ... Let W, X, Y, Z represent the input port of the decoder, then we get sixteen possible combinations of the four input signals, which means any digit (0 - 9) and some letters (A - F) can be displayed on the seven-segment LED display. Let a, b, c, d, e, f, g represent the output port of the decoder, and let on be 1 and off be 0, then we can create a truth table like Table3 for describing the intended behavior of the decoder. 3.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ...yclic variation in the peak frequency. The patterns are summarised in Table 4. Workloads 1. 2 and 3 from Table4 were simply an alternating cycle of two different peak frequencies which exercise two of the partitions whilst workload 4. was a cycle... ..."