Results 1 - 10
of
1,097
Table 1. Modeling Runs Using Southern California CALVIN model With additional MWD
"... In PAGE 5: ... Four CALVIN model runs are used to analyze Southern California water marketing and transfers. Two subsets of runs describe the modeling strategy: 1) no allocation or operation policy rules internal to the region except for environmental flows and emergency earthquake storage constraints and 2) policy constrained runs with pre- allocated deliveries representing current water allocation policies (See Table1 ). While all four runs are presented here, the majority of focus is on Runs A and B.... ..."
Table II-1. Southern California Reservoirs Included in CALVIN Surface Water Reservoirs CALVIN
Table III-2. Severity of Extreme Droughts in the Southern California Colorado Riverb Feather Riverc LAA Inflowd Drought
Table1 Mean proportions of species represented by seedlings, total numbers of seedling species and numbers of these spe- cies thought to be dependent on fire for recruitment in recently burned sites in southern California and Florida
1025
"... In PAGE 5: ...3). Recently burned sites tended to have higher numbers of seedling species in California, even though species were quantified there over a smaller area per site ( Table1 and Fig. 3).... In PAGE 10: ... This diC128erence suggests that estab- lishment conditions between fires were occasionally favourable in California, but only rarely so in Florida. Among recently burned sites, California sites had higher seedling densities and proportions of species represented by seedlings than Florida sites, and also had more species dependent upon fire for seedling recruitment ( Table1 and Fig.3).... ..."
Table 6. Mountain ranges, numbers of owls and distance between ranges in southern California from Noon and McKelvey (1992) Mountain Range Total owl sites Nearest Neighbor Distance (miles) Palomar Mountain 18 18-33
2000
Table2 Significance tests of variation in site characteristics explained by canonical axes, and of variation among seedling- related variables (i.e. seedling density, proportion of species represented by seedlings) and site-related variables (i.e. percen- tage open canopy and soil phosphorus, nitrogen, sand, clay and pH) explained by canonical variates in recently burned sites in Florida and southern California
1025
"... In PAGE 8: ... 3), canonical correlation did not demonstrate a significant relationship between these seedling variables and site variables. Neither of the canonical variates was significant ( Table2 ), and both site canonical variates combined explained only 41% of the variance in seedling den- sity and proportion of species represented by seed- lings. California sites One significant axis accounted for 71% of the varia- bility in the data and defined a gradient from less open sites with relatively sandy low-pH soils to more open sites with less sandy higher-pH soils (loadings shown in Table3).... In PAGE 8: ...b) California (abbreviations as in Fig.3). Coordinates of vectors represent direction and strength of loading on canonical axes for six site variables (see Table3), and axis lengths are proportional to the amount of variation in site variables that is explained. The first canonical axes explain 80% and 71% of the variation in site variables in Florida and California, respec- tively (see Table2 for significance levels). 1032 Post-fire seedling establishment in scrub # 1999 British Ecological Society Journal of Ecology,... In PAGE 9: ...i.e. percentage open canopy and soil phosphorus, nitrogen, sand, clay and pH). The canonical correlation produced two canonical variates, with the first variate significant ( Table2 ); the second, although only barely signifi- cant, nevertheless substantially improved the corre- lation. The two site canonical variates combined explained 78% of the variance in seedling density and proportion of species represented by seedlings.... ..."
Table 1: California Generation Ownership as of 1999
2004
"... In PAGE 5: ... Although there had been some indications of market power problems as early as August 1998,6 a second round of divestiture proceeded in the Spring of 1999 with little controversy despite the fact that this second round of divestiture actually increased the concentration of ownership in southern California. Table1 shows the market ownership as of the fall of 1999. On the demand side, despite the availability of retail choice the vast majority of customers remained with the incumbent utilities.... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 1. Scarcity, Scarcity Cost, and Operating Cost
2004
"... In PAGE 4: ... 5. Economic Value of Conjunctive Use in Southern California [24] Table1 shows the average annual scarcity, scarcity cost, and operating cost for the different alternatives. Water scarcity is defined as the difference between modeled deliveries and the water quantity users would take were it freely available at zero marginal cost.... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 2 Accuracy assessment of all models, using 169 presence points from California and Oregon: number represents percentage of training points found in each risk class Model type
2006
"... In PAGE 15: ... We cannot assess accuracy for the models in areas outside of California and southern Oregon with field data (as there are no positive cases of P. ramorum outside of CA and OR), and accuracy of the models varied widely within that area ( Table2 ). The most accu- rate model (defined as the number of positive samples falling into the highest risk area) was the SVM model, with 98.... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
1,097