"... In PAGE 4: ...Table 1: Pivot alignment experiment results (null links in standard not counted) The partly correct alignments are those where part(s) of a multi-word-unit, but not all of it, have been correctly aligned. As you can see in Table1 , the potentially thorny issue did not arise of how to count a partially correct link added by pivot alignment. We see that only a few units survived the trip through two languages, but out of those that did, most contributed positively to the total result.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ...Table 1: Pivot alignment experiment results (null links in standard not counted) The partly correct alignments are those where part(s) of a multi-word-unit, but not all of it, have been correctly aligned. As you can see in Table1 , the potentially thorny issue did not arise of how to count a partially correct link added by pivot alignment. We see that only a few units survived the trip through two languages, but out of those that did, most contributed positively to the total result.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ... Neither pairwise nor parallel pivoting require pivot search outside of two rows, but pairwise pivoting is inherently sequential in its access to rows, whereas parallel pivoting #28as its name indicates#29 parallelizes easily. Table2 summarizes the analysis in #5B77#5D of the speed and stability of these methods 1 . The point is that in the worst case partial, pairwise and parallel pivoting are all unstable, but on average only parallel pivoting is unstable.... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ... The same training and test process is carried out. The test results are summed up in Table5 , in which considerable improvements are also obtained with regard to pivoted cosine (for English 21.12% and 9.... ..."

"... In PAGE 16: ... 10. The EWF and AR optimal Pareto-base curves when using the library from Table 8 latency axis are presented in Table10 . Note that the 0% column corresponds to an immediate pivot to area-axis exploration, and the 100% column corresponds to using solely latency-axis exploration.... In PAGE 17: ... Looking at Table 11, the rst example shown (DIFFEQ) is small enough that 5% of the time constraints is statistically insigni cant, leading to results that are dominated by the area-axis exploration. However, the EWF results give a strong argument for using dynamic pivoting { here a bad a priori choice of using only latency-axis exploration or area-axis exploration (as shown in Table10 ) could lead to a signi cantly larger execution time than 15% dynamic pivoting. 9.... ..."